A Three-Level Framwork for Utilizing the Demand Response to Improve the Operation of the Integrated Energy Systems

  • Yi DingEmail author
  • Yonghua Song
  • Hongxun Hui
  • Changzheng Shao


The electricity output of combined heat and power (CHP) units is constrained by their heat output corresponding to customers' heat demand, which makes it difficult for the CHP units to frequently adjust their electricity output. Therefore, additional balancing power is required to integrate the variable wind power in the CHP-based heat and electricity integrated energy system (HE-IES). This chapter expands the demand response (DR) concept to the HE-IES. A comprehensive DR strategy combining energy substitution and load shifting is first developed to exploit the demand flexibility of smart buildings. Besides electric balancing power, heat balancing power is also provided to relax the production constrains of CHP units. Moreover, a real-time DR exchange (DRX) market is developed where the building aggregators are stimulated to adjust buildings' energy consumption behaviors and provide the required balancing power. Compared with the existing day-ahead DRX market, the real-time DRX market can balance the very short-term wind power fluctuation and reduce price spikes. Additionally, a novel optimum feasible region method is proposed to achieve the fast clearing of the DRX market to meet the higher requirement for clearing speed in the real-time market. Simulation results verify the advantages of the proposed technique.


  1. 1.
    G. Streckienė, V. Martinaitis, A.N. Andersen, J. Katz, Feasibility of CHP-plants with thermal stores in the German spot market. Appl. Energy 86, 2308–2316 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.F. Bach, Towards 50% wind electricity in Denmark: dilemmas and challenges. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 1–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    X. Lu, M.B. McElroy, W. Peng, S. Liu, C.P. Nielsen, H. Wang, Challenges faced by China compared with the US in developing wind power. Nat. Energy 1, 16061 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.G. Nielsen, J.M. Morales, M. Zugno, T.E. Pedersen, H. Madsen, Economic valuation of heat pumps and electric boilers in the Danish energy system. Appl. Energy 167, 189–200 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Lu, M.B. Mcelroy, W. Peng, S. Liu, C.P. Nielsen, H. Wang, Challenges Faced by China Compared with the US in Developing Wind Power, vol. 1 (2016), p. 16061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. Erdinc, N.G. Paterakis, I.N. Pappi, A.G. Bakirtzis, J.P.S. Catalão, A new perspective for sizing of distributed generation and energy storage for smart households under demand response. Appl. Energy 143, 26–37 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.H. Shaikh, N.B.M. Nor, P. Nallagownden, I. Elamvazuthi, T. Ibrahim, A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort management of smart sustainable buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 34, 409–429 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Lin, P. Barooah, S. Meyn, T. Middelkoop, Experimental evaluation of frequency regulation from commercial building HVAC systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6, 776–783 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Vivekananthan, Y. Mishra, G. Ledwich, F. Li, Demand response for residential appliances via customer reward scheme. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 5, 809–820 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Bilgin, M.C. Caramanis, I.C. Paschalidis, C.G. Cassandras, Provision of regulation service by smart buildings. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7, 1683–1693 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.T. Nguyen, M. Negnevitsky, M.D. Groot, Pool-based demand response exchange—concept and modeling. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26, 1677–1685 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.T. Nguyen, M. Negnevitsky, M.D. Groot, Walrasian market clearing for demand response exchange. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27, 535–544 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, A. Alabdulwahab, A. Abusorrah, Demand response exchange in the stochastic day-ahead scheduling with variable renewable generation. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 6, 516–525 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Shao, Y. Ding, P. Siano, Z. Lin, A framework for incorporating demand response of smart buildings into the integrated heat and electricity energy system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 66(2):1465-1475 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Geidl, G. Andersson, Optimal power flow of multiple energy carriers. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22, 145–155 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Daryanian, R.E. Bohn, R.D. Tabors, Optimal demand-side response to electricity spot prices for storage-type customers. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 4, 897–903 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Wang, J.Y. Huang, Y. Ding, P. Loh, L. Goel, Demand side load management of smart grids using intelligent trading/metering/billing system, in IEEE PES General Meeting (2010), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.C. Sonderegger, Dynamic Models of House Heating Based on Equivalent Thermal Parameters (1978)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    X.S. Jiang, Z.X. Jing, Y.Z. Li, Q.H. Wu, W.H. Tang, Modelling and operation optimization of an integrated energy based direct district water-heating system. Energy 64, 375–388 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Y. Ding, S. Pineda, P. Nyeng, J. Ostergaard, E.M. Larsen, Q. Wu, Real-time market concept architecture for EcoGrid EU—A prototype for European smart grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 2006–2016 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Z. Li, W. Wu, J. Wang, B. Zhang, T. Zheng, Transmission-constrained unit commitment considering combined electricity and district heating networks. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7, 480–492 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Awad, M. Chaudry, J. Wu, N. Jenkins, Integrated optimal power flow for electric power and heat in a MicroGrid, in International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (2009), pp. 1–4Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Orfanogianni, G. Gross, A general formulation for LMP evaluation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22, 1163–1173 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Jabr, A.H. Coonick, B.J. Cory, A primal-dual interior point method for optimal power flow dispatching. IEEE Power Eng. Rev. 22, 55 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Wang, M.H. Nehrir, Analytical approaches for optimal placement of distributed generation sources in power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19, 2068–2076 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Shabanpour-Haghighi, A.R. Seifi, Simultaneous integrated optimal energy flow of electricity, gas, and heat. Energy Convers. Manag. 101, 579–591 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    L. Pedersen, Method for Load Modelling of Heat and Electricity Demand (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Hui, Y. Ding, W. Liu, Y. Lin, Y. Song, Operating reserve evaluation of aggregated air conditioners. Appl. Energy 196, 218–228 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Z. Pan, Q. Guo, H. Sun, Feasible region method based integrated heat and electricity dispatch considering building thermal inertia. Appl. Energy (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Jónsson, P. Pinson, H. Madsen, On the market impact of wind energy forecasts. Energy Econ. 32, 313–320 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Ding
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yonghua Song
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hongxun Hui
    • 1
  • Changzheng Shao
    • 1
  1. 1.Zhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.University of MacauMacauChina

Personalised recommendations