Advertisement

Design and Analysis of Composite Parabolic Leaf Spring Under Fatigue Load Condition

  • Priyadarshi DuttEmail author
  • T. Babu
  • M. Murugan
  • P. Anbarasu
  • Bala Subramani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Suspension is considered as a link between the wheels and the body. It absorbs fatigue loading and energy. Leaf spring is one of the oldest suspension types. Nowadays, parabolic leaf spring is mainly used in heavy load vehicles and machines. Design fundamentals of parabolic leaf spring are based on the strength and comfort. The strength properties of leaf spring are usually determined based on the suspension type and loading. The advantage of the parabolic leaf spring is due to its simple construction, low cost, and easy maintenance. The design also helps in providing the axle support. This paper mainly deals with the suspension uses of parabolic leaf spring. The difference between the normal leaf spring and the parabolic leaf spring is the total number of leaves. A parabolic leaf does not need of more number of leafs because the stress is distribution to the leaf are equally due to its parabolic shape.

Keywords

Leaf spring Parabolic leaf spring Fatigue analysis Suspension GFRP 

References

  1. 1.
    Dubey DN, Mahakalkar SG (2013) Stress analysis of a Mono-parabolic leaf spring—a review. Int J Mod Eng Res India 769–772Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Varvani-Farahani A, Sharma M, Kianoush MR (2005) Fatigue damage analysis and life assessment under variable amplitude loading conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 403:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li B, Reis L, de Freitas M (2006) Simulation of cyclic stress/strain evolutions for multiaxial fatigue life prediction. Int J Fatigue 28:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leevy G, Cao K (2004) Evaluation of a multi-leaf hybrid springs for automotive suspensions. SAE Technical Paper Series 2004-01-0782Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandrabose S, Thamodharan C, Naveenchandran P, Anbazhagan R (2014) Design optimization and analysis of a parabolic leaf spring. Middle-East J Sci Res 20(11):1590–1596Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karlus EN, Himte RL, Rathore RK (2014) Optimization of mono parabolic leaf spring. Int J Adv Eng Technol 7(1):284–291Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chauhan A, John F (2016) Static analysis of parabolic leaf spring with that of conventional leaf spring by finite element analysis using Ansys. Imp J Interdiscip Res 2(6):1022–1028Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vijayarangan S, Ganesan N (1994) Static stress analysis of a composite bevel gear using a three-dimensional finite element method. Comput Struct 51(6):771–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanabe K, Seino T, Kajio Y (1982) Characteristics of carbon/glass fiber reinforced plastic leaf spring. SAE 820403, pp 1628–1634 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu WJ, Kim HC (1998) Double tapered FRP beam for automobile suspension leaf spring. Compos Struct 279–300Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priyadarshi Dutt
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Babu
    • 1
  • M. Murugan
    • 1
  • P. Anbarasu
    • 1
  • Bala Subramani
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSri Sai Ram Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSri Sai Ram Institute of TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations