Advertisement

Optimization of Transient State Temperature Distribution Analysis on Diffusion-Bonded Joints of Ti–6Al–4V With SS304L Stainless Steel Alloy

  • K. MuthukumarEmail author
  • R. B. Durairaj
  • G. Mageshwaran
  • J. Jayajeevahan
  • V. Sriram
  • Vikram Naidu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The Experimental study of transient solid state diffusion bonding was created with dissimilar material such as Ti–6Al–4V and SS304L stainless steel for the parameters such as temperature (1023, 1073, and 1123 K), pressure (50, 100, and 150 bar), and holding time (1, 1.5, and 2 h). The maximum tensile strength and maximum hardness were gained experimentally and theoretically for the corresponding conditions of temperature, pressure, and holding time. Among the analysis from the results relations to the chosen parameters were studied and mentioned. Also maximum and minimum temperature distributions and maximum and minimum stress intensities of diffusion-bonded joints were mentioned through ANSYS diagrams.

Keywords

Diffusion bonding Tensile strength Hardness Temperature distribution Stress intensity 

References

  1. 1.
    Orhan N, Aksoy M, Eroglu M (1999) A new model for diffusion bonding and its application to duplex alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 271:458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balasubramanian M, Ramesh G, Balasubramanian V (2015) Diffusion bonding of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V and AISI304 stainless steel—an experimental investigation. J Eng Sci Technol 10(10):1342–1349Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurt B, Orhan N, Hasçalık A (2007) Effect of high heating and cooling rate on interface of diffusion bonded gray cast iron to medium carbon steel. Mater Design 28:2229–2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurta Bulent, Çalik Adnan (2009) Interface structure of diffusion bonded duplex stainless steel and medium carbon steel couple. Mater Charact 60:1035–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orhan N, Khanand TI, Eroglu M (2001) Diffusion bonding of a micro duplex SS to Ti–6Al–4V. Scripta Mater 45:441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Islam MF, Ridley N (1998) Isostatic diffusion bonding of a microduplex Stainless steel. Scripta Mater 38(8):1187–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elrefaey A, Tillmann W (2009) Solid state diffusion bonding of titanium to steel using a copper base alloy as interlayer. J Mater Process Technol 209:2746–2752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghosh M, Das S, Banarjee PS, Chatterjee S (2005) Variation in the reaction zone and its effects on the strength of diffusion bonded titanium–stainless steel couple. Mater Sci Eng A 390:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fielding J, Needham JC (1970) Advances in welding processes. Abington Hall, Cambridge, pp 72–77Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuan XJ, Sheng GM, Qin B, Huang WZ, Zhou B (2008) Impulse pressuring diffusion bonding of titanium alloy to stainless steel. Mater Charact 59:930–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He P, Feng JC, Zhang BG, Qian YY (2003) A new technology for diffusion bonding intermetallic Ti Al to steel with composite barrier layers. Mater Charact 50:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kothandaraman CP, Subramaniyan S Heat and mass transfer data book, 7th edn. New Age International PublicationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Muthukumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. B. Durairaj
    • 2
  • G. Mageshwaran
    • 2
  • J. Jayajeevahan
    • 2
  • V. Sriram
    • 2
  • Vikram Naidu
    • 2
  1. 1.Chendhuran College of Engineering and TechnologyPudukkottaiIndia
  2. 2.Sathyabama Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations