Advertisement

A Comparative Study of Flow Characteristics of BMW M6 and AUDI R8 Commercial Sports Car Using Flow Design Software

  • S. Renold ElsenEmail author
  • K. Jegadeesan
  • J. Ronald Aseer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The aerodynamic characteristics of the vehicular profiles have grown more concentration as it has influence on fuel consumption, comfort, and driving characteristics. The objective of the current work is to study the aerodynamic characteristics investigations of BMW M6 and AUDI R8 using both experimental and computational approaches. The computation analysis was done using the models developed using FREE FORM SCULPT module in AUTODESK FUSION 360. The airflow around a model is analyzed by AUTODESK FLOW DESIGN-VIRTUAL WIND TUNNEL software to assess the drag force, drag co-efficient and interacting flow fields. The drag force is also calculated analytically for the two cars and was found to be in good agreement with the computational results. The prediction of experimental aerodynamic characteristics is done by conventional wind tunnel approach. The experimental investigations were done on an open-loop suction-type wind tunnel having a 30 cm × 30 cm × 100 cm test section. The 3D prototype of reduced scale (1:15) of the two car models was developed using the 3D printing machining from generated software models. The computation results were found to be validated by the experimental results by the wind tunnel method.

References

  1. 1.
    Gilhaus RH, Hoffmann R (1998) Directional stability, aerodynamics of road vehicles. SAE International, Warrendale, PAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braess HH, Seiffert UW (2005) Handbook of automotive engineering, Vol. 312. SAE Technical PaperGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hucho WH, Sovran Gino (1993) Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25(1):485–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katz J (2006) Race car aerodynamics: designing for speed. R. BentleyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han T et al (1996) Flow-field simulations of three simplified vehicle shapes and comparisons with experimental measurements, No. 960678. SAE Technical PaperGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ratzel Marc, Ludescher Thomas (2013) Streamlining aerodynamic CFD analyses. Altair Engineering Inc., USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Renold Elsen S et al (2018) Limbs related handicap drivable non commercial electric shuttle vehicle. SAE Technical PaperGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vivekananthan et al (2018) Bike with modified steering system to assist people with forearm disability. SAE Technical PaperGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Renold Elsen S et al (2014) Design of composite fixture for machining ceramic materials using abrasive water jet machining (AWJM). ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 9(4):388–392Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Renold Elsen S et al (2016) Empirical and finite element prediction and validation of weld bead profile generated during TIG welding process. Glob J Pure Appl Math (GJPAM) 12(4):15–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Renold Elsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Jegadeesan
    • 2
  • J. Ronald Aseer
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Design and Automation, School of Mechanical EngineeringVITVelloreIndia
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringSRMISTChennaiIndia
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringGalgotias UniversityGreater NoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations