Evaluation of Tensile Properties of Nanoclay-Filled Madar Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Hybrid Composites

  • Gunti RajeshEmail author
  • M. V. Raghavendra Rao
  • K. Vijay
  • S. Gopinath
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


In the present work, an effort has been made to improve the mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced polyester composite using nanoclay. The composite specimens were prepared with varying weight proportions of short-madar fiber in the polyester matrix from 2.5 to 15% at an interval of 2.5% without and with nanoclay of 1%. The samples were then tested for tensile properties and the results were analyzed. The results showed that the tensile strength of composite was increased with increased fiber loading up to 10%, and with further addition of fibers, there was decrease in the tensile strength. The maximum value attained for 10% fiber loading was 23.33 MPa. The tensile strength of nanoclay-filled madar fiber-reinforced composite is increased to a value of 25.16 MPa up to 10% fiber loading and then with further addition of fibers along with nanoclay, the tensile strength is reduced. It is also observed that there increase in the modulus of madar fiber composite to a value of 520.2 MPa up to fiber loading of 15% and the tensile modulus of nanofilled fiber composites is increased to a value of 460.35 MPa up to fiber loading of 15% which is 11.5% less compared to that of composite without nanoclay. It is observed that there is reduction in the percentage elongation at break for madar fiber-reinforced polyester composite with and without nanoclay filler. The drop is 43.7% in madar fiber composite and it is much higher in composite filled with nanoclay.


Polyester Madar fiber Nanoclay Tensile strength 


  1. 1.
    Saba N, Tahir PM, Jawaid M (2014) A review on potentiality of nano filler/natural fiber filled polymer hybrid composites. Polymers 6(8):2247–2273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arulmurugan S, Venkateshwaran NR (2016) Vibration analysis of nanoclay filled natural fiber composites. Polym Polym Compos 24(7):507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Essabir H, Raji M, Bouhfid R, Qaiss AEK (2016) Nanoclay and natural fibers based hybrid composites: mechanical, morphological, thermal and rheological properties. In: Engineering materials—nanoclay reinforced polymer composites. Springer Science, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Binu PP, George KE, Vinodkumar MN (2016) Effect of nanoclay, Cloisite15A on the mechanical properties and thermal behavior of glass fiber reinforced polyester. Procedia Technol 25(2016):846–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majeed K, Jawaid M, Hassan A, Abu Bakar A, Abdul Khalil HPS, Salema AA, Inuwa I (2013) Potential materials for food packaging from nanoclay/natural fibres filled hybrid composites. Mater Des 46(6):391–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ratna Prasad AV, Balakotesara Rao K, Mohana Rao K, Ramanaiah K, Kumar Gudapati SP (2015) Influence of nanoclay on the mechanical performance of wild cane grass fiber-reinforced polyester nanocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 20(6):541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lim KM, Majid MSA, Ridzuan MJM, Basaruddin KS, Afendi M (2017) Effect of nano-clay fillers on mechanical and morphological properties of Napier/epoxy composites. IOP Conf Ser J Phys Conf Ser 908:1–9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thanh T, Mao N, Ngan N, Thanh N, Tai D (2011) Effect of nanoclay on properties of the biocomposite based on unsaturated polyester resin and bamboo fibers. VNU J Sci Math Phys 27(3):165–173Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramsaroop A, Kanny K, Mohan TP (2010) Fracture toughness studies of polypropylene—clay nanocomposites and glass fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Sci Appl 1:301–309Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Njuguna J, Pielichowski K, Desai S (2008) Nanofiller fibre-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Polym Adv Technol 19(8):947–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nozari O, Madanipour M, Farsi M, Tabei A (2013) Mechanical properties and water uptake of nanoclay/wood flour/LDPE composites after fiber surfacemercerization. Cellul Chem Technol 47(3–4):295–301Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo G, Park C, Lee Y, Kim Y, Sain M (2007) Flame retarding effects of nanoclay on wood–fiber composites. Polym Eng Sci 47(3):330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dorigato A, Morandi S, Pegoretti A (2011) Effect of nanoclay addition on the fiber/matrix adhesion in epoxy/glass composites. J Compos Mater 46(12):1439–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunti Rajesh
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. V. Raghavendra Rao
    • 1
  • K. Vijay
    • 1
  • S. Gopinath
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDVR & Dr. HS MIC College of TechnologyKanchikacherlaIndia

Personalised recommendations