Profiling Indolic Auxins Produced by the Strains of Aspergillus Using Novel HPTLC Technique

  • Dhavalkumar Patel
  • Anoshi Patel
  • Disha Vora
  • Kinjal Desai
  • Sudeshna Menon
  • Sebastian Vadakan
  • Dweipayan GoswamiEmail author


Fungi are recognized to have dealings with plants by several known mechanisms, one of which is through the production of phytohormones, auxins. Indole-3-acetate (IAA), indole-3-butyrate (IBA), and indole-3-pyruvate (IPyA), i.e., indolic auxins, are most widely yield by the strains of fungi through which they interact with plants. Fungal strains produce these indolic auxins by tryptophan (Trp)-dependent and tryptophan-independent pathways. Under present study, we found Aspergillus flavus strain PGFW, Aspergillus niger strain BFW, and Aspergillus caespitosus strain DGFW as the utmost effective IAA-producing strains from the rhizosphere of well-growing wheat plant which was determined by spectrophotometric method that uses Salkowski reagent. This method though has a flaw that it is not specific to IAA but develops color by reacting with all the other indolic derivatives. We found that for the spectrophotometric method, the absorption maxima (λmax) of the mixture containing indolic compounds tend to shift when compared to pure standard. To overcome this limitation, high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)-based etiquette is technologically advanced for the first time to precisely detect and calculate the amount of IAA and IBA in the assortment of 100 to 1000 ng per spot ignoring other Trp derivatives. HPTLC analysis showed that all the three strains under current study could produce indolic auxins by Trp-dependent and Trp-independent pathways, but the amount of indolic auxins produced was enhanced in presence of Trp. These strains may act as phytoaugmentor or phytopathogen, but for their mode of action, they produce various indolic auxins which can be profiled by the novel method described in this paper.


Aspergillus spp.  Indolic compounds HPTLC 



Authors are thankful to the Gujarat State Biotechnology Mission (GSBTM) for providing the funding under FAP 2016 GSBTM/MD/PROJECTS/SSA/5041/2016-17 project and St. Xaveir’s College (Autonomous), Ahmedabad-380009 for providing necessary facilities.


  1. 1.
    Akbari GA, Arab SM, Alikhani HA, Allakdadi I, Arzanesh MH (2007) Isolation and selection of indigenous Azospirillum spp. and the IAA of superior strains effects on wheat roots. World J Agric Sci (WJAS) 3(4):523–529Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beni A, Soki E, Lajtha K, Fekete I (2014) An optimized HPLC method for soil fungal biomass determination and its application to a detritus manipulation study. J Microbiol Methods 103:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De-Palma M, D’Agostino N, Proietti S, Bertini L, Lorit M, Ruocco M, Tucci M (2016) Suppression Subtractive Hybridization analysis provides new insights into the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) response to the plant probiotic microorganism Trichoderma longibrachiatum MK1. J Plant Physiol 190:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dhandhukia PC, Thakkar VR (2008) Separation and quantitation of jasmonic acid using HPTLC. J Chromatogr Sci 46(4):320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dhandhukia PC, Thakker JN (2011) Quantitative analysis and validation of method using HPTLC. In: High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC). Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glickmann E, Dessaux Y (1995) A critical examination of the specificity of the salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(2):793–796PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC (2015) Simultaneous detection and quantification of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) produced by rhizofungi from l-tryptophan (Trp) using HPTLC. J Microbiol Methods 110:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goswami D, Vaghela H, Parmar S, Dhandhukia P, Thakker JN (2013) Plant growth promoting potentials of Pseudomonas spp. strain OG isolated from marine water. J Plant Interact 8(4):281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartmann A, Singh M, Klingmüller W (1983) Isolation and characterization of Azospirillum mutants excreting high amounts of indoleacetic acid. Can J Microbiol 29(8):916–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karnwal A (2009) Production of indole acetic acid by fluorescent Pseudomonas in the presence of L-tryptophan and rice root exudates. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 91:61–63Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meiners SJ, Phipps KK, Pendergast TH, Canam T, Carson WP (2017) Soil microbial communities alter leaf chemistry and influence allelopathic potential among coexisting plant species. Oecologia 203(4):1155–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swain MR, Naskar SK, Ray RC (2007) Indole-3-acetic acid production and effect on sprouting of yam (Dioscorea rotundata L.) minisetts by Bacillus subtilis isolated from culturable cowdung microflora. Pol J Microbiol 56(2):103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szkop M, Bielawski W (2013) A simple method for simultaneous RP-HPLC determination of indolic compounds related to fungal biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 103(3):683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhavalkumar Patel
    • 1
  • Anoshi Patel
    • 1
  • Disha Vora
    • 1
  • Kinjal Desai
    • 1
  • Sudeshna Menon
    • 1
  • Sebastian Vadakan
    • 1
  • Dweipayan Goswami
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and BiotechnologySt. Xavier’s College (Autonomous)AhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations