Advertisement

Assessing the Relationship Between Marketing Mix and Customer Satisfaction: Evidence from Iranian Dairy Companies

  • Esmaeil PishbaharEmail author
  • Roya Ferdowsi
  • Babollah Hayati
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Development in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region book series (PDMENA)

Abstract

The aim of this study is threefold: identifying the effective factors of customer satisfaction with dairy products based on marketing mix elements, using the DEMATEL-ANP integrated techniques to determine the relative importance of each of these factors and using the TOPSIS to rank seven Iranian dairy companies based on the level of their customer satisfaction. We collected data from 500 dairy products’ consumers in Tabriz County. Our results show that the product and promotion criteria were ‘effective’ and between them, the ‘product’ criterion had a greatest impact on the other criteria, while the price and the location criteria were the ‘affected’ criteria. Also, the sub-criterion ‘product diversity’ in the product criteria, the ‘appropriate price’ sub-criterion in the price criteria, the sub-criterion ‘coordination of the distribution channel and timely delivery’ in the criteria place and the sub-criterion ‘advertising and promotional and incentive measures’ in the criteria promotion were more important. The results following the TOPSIS method show that PEGAH Company got the first place based on customer satisfaction, while MIHAN and KALE were in the second and third places. RAMAK, KOHSARAN, SUTICH and PAK were ranked next in terms of customer satisfaction.

Keywords

Dairy companies Marketing mix Satisfaction Tabriz County 

References

  1. Alam-tabriz A, Rajabani N, Farrokh M (2014) An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-TOPSIS methodology for supplier selection problem. Global J Manag Stud Res 1(2):85–99Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ebrahim Dehkordi B, Imanipour N, Nilipour Tabatabai SA (2013) Determining optimal marketing mix in new dairy industry using analytical hierarchy process method. In: International Management Conference, Challenges and Solutions (in Persian)Google Scholar
  3. Al Muala A (2012) Assessing the relationship between marketing mix and loyalty through tourists satisfaction in Jordan curative tourism. Am Acad Sch Res J 4(2):1Google Scholar
  4. Asiayi M, Tabasi Lotfabadi V (2014) Prioritizing elements of service marketing mix on customers’ choices in selecting a bank by AHP process in Sabzevar County. In: The 2nd International Conference on Challenges and Solutions (in Persian)Google Scholar
  5. Aziznia F, Shiri A (2013) The effect of effective properties of dairy distribution system on customer satisfaction. In: The 2nd National Conference on the Study of Strategies for Promoting Issues of Management, Accounting and Industrial Engineering in Organizations (in Persian)Google Scholar
  6. Bagheri SM, Babajantabarenashli I, SafayiNavayi M, Alipourmarzangu A (2014) Investigating the effect of commercial promotion elements on related marketing: a case study of Dooka Mahmoudabad company. In: International Conference of Economics, Accounting, Management and Social Sciences (in Persian)Google Scholar
  7. Buyukozkan G, Cifci G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3000–3011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen JK, Chen IS (2010) Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Syst Appl 37:1981–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fontela E, Gabus A (1976) The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Switzerland, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  10. Gholipoor soleymani A (2009) Prioritizing the factors affecting the marketing of hotel industry by AHP (case study: Gilan province). Q J Geogr Prospect 4(8):157–178 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  11. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karaşan A, Kahraman C (2017) A novel intuitionist fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-TOPSIS integrated methodology for freight village location selection. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 1–18Google Scholar
  13. Mehri Chrodeh M, Tajdini A, Pourmusa SH (2016) Identifying and ranking of the effective factors on customer loyalty in the wooden furniture industry by ANP and FUZZY DEMATEL approaches in Gulilan and Alborz provinces. J Wood Forest Sci Technol 22(4):29–54Google Scholar
  14. Mohammadi A, Saminiya AA, Javanmardi E (2015) Application of integration method of DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS to prioritize investment portfolio. J Financ Eng Manag Secur 24:15–40 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  15. Mombini H, Yazdani Chamzini A (2014) Presenting a new method for prioritizing investment strategies in Iran’s private sector. Q J Invest Knowl 11:259–289 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  16. Norsyaheera AW, Lailatul Faizah AH, Siti Asiah MdSh, Siti Noorsuriani M (2016) The relationship between marketing mix and customer loyalty in hijab industry: the mediating effect of customer satisfaction. Fifth international conference on marketing and retailing (5TH INCOMAR). Precede Econ Finan 37:366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nuseir M, Madanat H (2015) 4Ps: A strategy to secure customers’ loyalty via customer satisfaction. Int J Market Stud 7(4):78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parsa J, Mahmoudi MJ, Afshar Kazemi MA (2015) Product ranking based on elements of marketing mix (4P) based on customer preferences using ANP (Samsung, Sony, LG, X, Vision, Panasonic). Master thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran unit, Faculty of Management and Accounting (in Persian)Google Scholar
  19. Rasekhnia M, Kazemi M, Nazemi SH (2012) Assessing and selecting the appropriate supplier for logistics activities using a integration of fuzzy Delphi methods, structural interpretive modeling and fuzzy ANP techniques. Case study: Behsaman Pegah Market Company in Khorasan. Master thesis. Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, Department of Management (in Persian)Google Scholar
  20. Sakthivel G, Ilangkumaran M, Gaikwad A (2015) A hybrid multi-criteria decision modeling approach for the best biodiesel blend selection based on ANP-TOPSIS analysis. Ain Shams Eng J 6(1):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salar J (2008) Relationship between marketing mix and consumer behavior. Tadbir Monthly No. 176 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  22. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98Google Scholar
  23. Taheri M, Abbaspour RA, Alavipanah K (2015) Using multi-criteria decision based on combination of DEMATEL and ANP methods for Cemetery Site Selection (case study: Isfahan). Anthropology 40(2):463–480 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  24. Tamura H, Akazawa K (2005) Structural modeling and systems analysis of uneasy factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society. J Telecommun Inf Technol 3:64–72Google Scholar
  25. Uygun O, Kurt Tekez E, Kacamak H, Simsir F (2014) An integrated approach using DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS for evaluating research and development projects. Periodicals Eng Nat Sci 2(1):24–30Google Scholar
  26. Vinodh S, Sai Balagi TS, Patil A (2016) A hybrid MCDM approach for agile concept selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1979–1987. Available at http://amary.ir/topsis/
  27. Zarei M, Fatemi MR, Mortazavi MS, Pourebrahim SH, Ghoddousi J (2016) Selection of the optimal tourism site using the ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS in the framework of Integrated Coastal Zone Management: a case of Qeshm Island. Ocean Coast Manag 130:179–187 (in Persian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esmaeil Pishbahar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roya Ferdowsi
    • 1
  • Babollah Hayati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations