Advertisement

Agricultural Risk Management Through Weather-Based Insurance in Iran

  • Esmaeil PishbaharEmail author
  • Sahar Abedi
  • Ghader Dashti
  • Ali KianiRad
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Development in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region book series (PDMENA)

Abstract

Agricultural production is inherently a risky business. Farmers face a variety of risks and natural disasters such as weather risks, pests, and plant diseases. Risks are inevitable but are also controllable. One effective risk management tool is agricultural insurance. However, traditional insurance plans have some problems such as high transaction costs and asymmetric information challenges such as moral hazard and adverse selection. Therefore, in this study weather-based crop insurance (WBCI) is presented for rainfed wheat as an efficient approach for risk management as it does not have the problems of traditional insurance. We collected details of weather variables (e.g., temperature and precipitation) and yields of rainfed wheat (‘Sardari variety’) during the period 1987–2013. Of late, the vine copula functions have been very successful in the dependence structure for measuring and expressing joint distribution functions. We measured the dependence structure between weather indices and wheat yields using the vine copula functions; we also calculated the indemnity function and premium amounts. Our results show that the D-vine model is better than the C-vine model for describing joint distribution. Hence, we used this model to compute the premium for rainfed wheat. The premium was calculated in four levels of coverage (50, 80, 90, and 100%). Our results show that its amount at the 80% coverage level was 588,320 Rial. The computing premium in WBCI is less than current insurance premium which is reasonable.

Keywords

Weather-based crop insurance Risk Vine copula Rainfed wheat Iran 

References

  1. Aas K, Czado C, Frigessi A, Bakken H (2009) Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur Math Econ 44(2):182–198Google Scholar
  2. Ardestani H (2012) The feasibility of weather based crop insurance in the management of rainfed wheat. Master thesis. University of Tehran, Agricultural Faculty (in Persian)Google Scholar
  3. Aziznasiri S (2011) Weather-based crop insurance as a viable instrument for agricultural risk management in Iran. Master thesis, Allameh Tabataba’i University, E.C.O. College of Insurance (in Persian)Google Scholar
  4. Bedford T, Cooke RM (2001) Probability density decomposition for conditionally dependent random variables modeled by vines. Ann Math Artif Intell 32(1–4):245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedford T, Cooke RM (2002) Vines: a new graphical model for dependent random variables. Ann Stat 30(4):1031–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokusheva R (2010) Measuring the dependence structure between yield and weather variables. Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar
  7. Brechmann EC, Czado C (2011) Risk management with high-dimensional vine copulas: an analysis of the Euro Stoxx 50. Submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  8. Brechmann EC, Czado C, Aas K (2010) Truncated regular vines and their applications. Can J Stat 40(1):68–85Google Scholar
  9. Brechmann EC, Schepsmeier U (2013) Modeling dependence with C- and D-vinecopulas: the R-package CDVine. J Stat Softw 52(3):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen S, Wilson WW, Larsen R, Dahl B (2013) Investing in agriculture as an asset class. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics Agricultural Experiment Station North Dakota State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Czado C, Brechmann EC, Gruber L (2013) Selection of vine copulas. In: Jaworski P, Durante F, Härdle W (eds) Copula in mathematical and quantitative finance. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 213. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. Dißmann J, Brechmann EC, Czado C, Kurowicka D (2013) Selecting and estimating regular vine copulae and application to financial returns. Comput Stat Data Anal 59:52–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer M (2002) Tailoring copula-based multivariate generalized hyperbolic secant distributions to financial return data: an empirical investigation. Institute of Statistics and Econometrics University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Lange Gasse 20, D-90403 Nurnberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghahremanzadeh M, Dashti GH, Afrasiyabi S, Hoseinzad J, Hayati B (2014) The feasibility of weather based crop insurance for rainfed wheat in Ahar County. Iran Agric Econ Develop Res 45(2):383–393 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  15. Goodwin BK (2012) Copula-based models of systemic risk in U.S. agriculture: implications for crop insurance and reinsurance contracts. The NBER conference on Insurance Markets and Catastrophe Risk in BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodwin BK, Holt MT, Onel G, Prestemon JP (2011) Copula-based nonlinear models of spatial market linkages. Am J Agric Econ, in pressGoogle Scholar
  17. Iran Agricultural Insurance Fund (2013) The report of Iran Agricultural Insurance Fund in recent years. Department of Planning & management (in Persian)Google Scholar
  18. Joe H (1996) Families of m-variate distributions with given margins and m(m − 1)/2 bivariate dependence parameters. In: Ruschendorf L, Schweizer B, Taylor MD (ed) Distributions with fixed marginals and related topicsGoogle Scholar
  19. Karuaihe RN, Wang HH, Young DL (2006) Weather-based crop insurance contracts for African Countries. Contributed paper prepared for presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurowicka D, Cooke RM (2006) Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling. In: Wiley series in probability and statistics, Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Nourmohammadi GH, Siyadat A, Kashani A (2005) Agronomy. The 6th print. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran (in Persian)Google Scholar
  23. Ofoghi R, Kianirad A, Aziznasiri S (2011) Agricultural insurance of climatic indices-based: an effective tool on agricultural risk management in Iran. Agric Insur (29):25–51 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  24. Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris 8:229–231Google Scholar
  25. Skees JR, Black JR, Barnett BJ (1997) Designing and rating an area-yield crop insurance contracts. Am J Agr Econ 79:430–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. The Ministry of Agriculture of Iran (2012) Iran Ministry of Agricultural Organization website. Available at: http://dbagri.maj.ir/cost/ostan.asp
  27. Turvey C, Belltawn BC (2009) Weather risk and the viability of weather insurance in western China. In: Conference of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Milwaukee, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu Y, Ghosh S, Goodwin B (2008) Modeling dependence in the design of whole farm insurance contract a copula-based approach. In: Contributed paper at the Annual Meeting of the AAEA, Orlando USA, July 27–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esmaeil Pishbahar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sahar Abedi
    • 1
  • Ghader Dashti
    • 1
  • Ali KianiRad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  2. 2.Agricultural Economics-Research, Deputy-APERDRI-Ministry of AgricultureTehranIran

Personalised recommendations