Advertisement

Testing for Neutrality and Super-neutrality of Money: Evidence from Iran’s Agricultural Sector

  • Esmaeil PishbaharEmail author
  • Zahra Rasouli
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Development in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region book series (PDMENA)

Abstract

This study uses the Fisher–Seater (FS) approach to test long-run neutrality (LRN) and long-run super-neutrality of money (LRSN) in Iran. The data used is quarterly real and nominal GDP, real and nominal agricultural product, and M2 for 1988–2008. The data was collected from the Central Bank of Iran. To formulate LRN and LRSN and to extract the restrictions required by them, the study first introduces the long-run derivative. FS assumes a log-linear bivariate system of the stationary and invertible ARIMA models. To use the FS approach, the integration order of variables should be known. Hence, the study uses different unit root tests (DF-GLS, ADF, KPSS, and HEGY). In addition, it also does the Zivot-Andrews test, which includes a structural break in the data. The results show that M2 is neutral with respect to real GDP and real agricultural output. However, for nominal agricultural output, neutrality of M2 is rejected. The neutrality results for the nominal GDP vary depending on the unit root test’s results. The findings indicate that the super-neutrality of M2 is confirmed with respect to real GDP.

Keywords

Agricultural sector The Fisher–Seater approach Long-run neutrality Super-neutrality Iran 

References

  1. Barro RJ (1977) Unanticipated money growth and unemployment in the United States. Am Econ Rev 67(2):101–115Google Scholar
  2. Barro RJ (1978) Unanticipated money, output, and price level in the United States. J Polit Econ 86(4):549–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro RJ, Rush M (1980) Unanticipated money and economic activity. In: Fischer S (ed) Rational expectations and economic policy. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullard J (1999) Testing long-run monetary neutrality propositions: lessons from the recent research. Fed Reserv Bank St Louis Rev 57–77Google Scholar
  5. Chen CH, Steindl FG (1987) Anticipated monetary and fiscal policy effects on output. J Macroecon 9(2):255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher ME, Seater JJ (1993) Long-run neutrality and super-neutrality in an ARIMA framework. Am Econ Rev 83(3):402–415Google Scholar
  7. Gordon RJ (1982) Price inertia and policy ineffectiveness in the United States, 1890–1980. J Polit Econ 9(90):1087–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jafari Samimi A, Erfani A (2004) Testing the long-run neutrality and super neutrality of money in Iran. J Econ Stud 67:117–138 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  9. Jafari Samimi A, Qhanbarzadeh Niear G (2009) Structural change and testing the hypotheses of rational expectations in Iran. J Econ Stud 88:47–67 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  10. Jalali Naini AR, Shiva R (1993) Monetary policy, rational expectations, output and inflation. The third Seminar of monetary and exchange policy, Monetary and Banking Research Institution (in Persian)Google Scholar
  11. Khataee M, Danehkar M (1994) Expected and unexpected monetary growth on GNP: case study of Iranian economy during 1971–1990. In: Fourth conference on monetary and foreign exchange rate policy, monetary and banking research institution (in Persian)Google Scholar
  12. Lucas R (1972) Expectation and the neutrality of money. J Econ Theory 4(2):103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lucas R (1973) Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. Am Econ Rev 63(3):326–334Google Scholar
  14. McGee RT, Stasiak RT (1985) Does anticipated monetary policy matter? Another look. J Money Credit Bank 17(1):16–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mishkin FS (1982a) Does anticipated monetary policy matter? An econometric investigation. J Polit Econ 90(1):22–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishkin FS (1982b) Does anticipated aggregate demand policy matter? Further econometric results. Am Econ Rev Am Econ Assoc 72(4):789–802Google Scholar
  17. Noriega A, Soria LM (2002) Structural breaks, orders of integration, and the neutrality hypothesis: further evidence. Department of Econometrics, Escuela de Economia, Universidad de Guanajuato. Available at: https://www.cass.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/65342/neutbrelondon.pdf
  18. Plosser CI (1989) Understanding real business cycles. J Econ Perspect 3(3):51–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Qadiminia N (1995) Hypothesis of rational expectations and monetary policy: a comparative study of the OPEC and fast-growing Southeast Asia countries. Master thesis in Economics, University of Allameh Tabatabai (in Persian)Google Scholar
  20. Sargent TJ, Wallace N (1975) Rational expectations, the optimal monetary instrument and the optimal money supply rate. J Polit Econ 83(2):241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Snowdon B, Vane HR, Wynarczyk P (1994) A modern guide to macroeconomics: an introduction to competing schools of thought. Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  22. Teshkini A, Shafiee A (2005) Monetary and financial variables of testing money neutrality. Q J Bus 35:125–152 (in Persian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations