Advertisement

A Soft Systems Approach to Lifelong Learning

  • Ryan W. Smithers
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 17)

Abstract

Scholastic success has largely been associated with the ability to develop and utilize skills in students that reflect the kinds of traits that are typically found in successful lifelong learners. This has, however, been a complex task that has left education in a state of flux as teachers and administrators struggle to work out the best way to equip students with subject knowledge and metacognitive skills. In addition to the complexities found in formal educational systems, non-formal educational systems seem to have been marginalized, leaving these educators in a conundrum as to how best to address the needs of lifelong learners who have left formal schooling behind to peruse further education in non-formal contexts. This phenomenon is especially evident in non-formal classrooms where foreign languages like English are typically taught to Second and Third Age learners. Therefore, this chapter proposes Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) as an approach to take when trying to deal with problematical educational systems in general and also to offer guidance to practitioners from non-formal learning systems. To this end, a case study is presented to demonstrate how SSM can be used to deal with some of the messiness that exists in educational contexts. This case study, based on a sampling of Third Age learners studying English as a foreign language (EFL), reveals how SSM is a sustainable way to help all of the stakeholders of a system work together to take action that aims at improving their system, which, in the case study presented here, meant discovering how to take action to improve learning by trying a new way of learning English grammar.

Keywords

English as a foreign language (EFL) Lifelong learning Older learners Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) Third Age learning 

References

  1. Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsop, A. (2013). Continuing professional development in health and social care: Strategies for lifelong learning (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnah, T., & Smithers, R. W. (2017). Reflecting on interaction: Using conversation analysis to improve ESL teacher reflection. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 21, 123–126.Google Scholar
  5. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Soft systems methodology. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approach to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 191–242). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1999). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. Brussels: EC. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/42878/1/com2001_0678.pdf
  9. Gasson, S. (1994). The use of soft systems methodology (SSM) as a tool for investigation. Warrick Business School. Retrieved from https://cci.drexel.edu/faculty/sgasson/Vita/UseOfSSM.pdf
  10. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Chicago: Follett.Google Scholar
  11. Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Laslett, P. (1987). The emergence of the third age. Ageing and Society, 7(2), 133–160.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00012538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. London, M. (2011). Lifelong learning: Introduction. In M. London (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 3–11). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Mezirow, J. (1995). Transformative theory of adult learning. In M. Welton (Ed.), In defense of the lifeworld. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 46(3), 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Passarelli, A. M., & Kolb, D. A. (2011). The learning way: Learning from experience as the path to lifelong learning and development. In M. London (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 70–90). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Smithers, R. W., & Gray, J. (2018). Enhancing the quality of life in lifelong learners: The influence of a meaning-order approach to pedagogical grammar on motivation and self-efficacy. Applied Linguistics Review, 0(0), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tajino, A. (2002). Transformation process models: A systemic approach to problematic team-teaching situations. Prospect, 17(3), 29–44.Google Scholar
  21. Yano Research. (2017). Educational industry market in Japan: Key research findings 2017. Tokyo: Yanno Research Institute Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.yanoresearch.com/press/pdf/1744.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan W. Smithers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Intercultural StudiesOtani UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations