Advertisement

Children and Pedagogy Between Science and Fiction

  • Paul Levinson
  • Petar JandrićEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Children: Global Posthumanist Perspectives and Materialist Theories book series (CGPPMT)

Abstract

In 2016, Paul Levinson and Petar Jandrić co-authored a dialogue about the relationships between media theory, human learning and science fiction. Published as a small book, From Media Theory to Space Odyssey: Petar Jandrić interviews Paul Levinson, and reprinted in Jandrić’s book Learning in the Age of Digital Reason, the unique positioning of the dialogue between academic research and artist talk has provoked a lot of interest. In this chapter, Levinson and Jandrić embark on a new dialogic inquiry about the relationships between children, pedagogy and science fiction. Levinson and Jandrić seek knowledge and inspiration about the relationships between children, pedagogy and science fiction beyond borders of academic disciplines, and beyond the distinction between academic inquiry and the practice of writing fiction. At the expense of breaking several academic conventions, the dialogue between Levinson and Jandrić creates a meta-theory which synthesises diverse approaches to reality and offers fresh insights into complex relationships between children, pedagogy and science fiction.

References

  1. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
  2. Asimov, I. (1959). The ugly little boy. In I. Asimov (Ed.), Nine tomorrows. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Asimov, I. (2016). The complete Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series books 1-7 (Foundation, Foundation and empire, Second Foundation, Foundation’s edge, Foundation and Earth, Prelude to Foundation, Forward the Foundation). New York, NY: Bantam Spectra.Google Scholar
  4. Barrie, J. M. (1904). Peter Pan; Or, the boy who wouldn’t grow up. London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  5. Bradbury, R. (1951). The last night of the world. In R. Bradbury (Ed.), The illustrated man. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  6. Burroughs, E. R. (1914). Tarzan of the apes. Chicago, IL: A. C. McClurg.Google Scholar
  7. Card, O. S. (1985). Ender’s game. New York, NY: Tor.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, J. (1995). Village of the damned [Motion picture]. Los Angeles: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, C. M. (1939). Results of the self-selection of diets by young children. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 41, 257–261.Google Scholar
  11. Descartes, R. (1641). Meditations on first philosophy. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from http://selfpace.uconn.edu/class/percep/DescartesMeditations.pdf.
  12. Golding, W. (1954/2001). Lord of the flies. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Herbert, F. (1965). Dune. New York, NY: Chilton Books.Google Scholar
  14. Jandrić, P. (2014). Deschooling virtuality. Open Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jandrić, P. (2015). Deschooling virtuality 2.0. Concept, 6(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. Jandrić, P. (2016). The methodological challenge of networked learning: (Post)disciplinarity and critical emancipation. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne & de Laat, M. (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 165–181). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jandrić, P., Devine, N., Jackson, E., Peters, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Mihaila, R., et al. (2017). Collective writing: An inquiry into praxis. Knowledge Cultures, 5(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf.
  20. Krugman, P. (2012). Asimov’s Foundation novels grounded my economics. The Guardian, 4 December. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/dec/04/paul-krugman-asimov-economics.
  21. Levinson, P. (1997). The soft edge: A natural history and future of the information revolution. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Levinson, P. (2001). Borrowed tides. New York, NY: Tor.Google Scholar
  23. Levinson, P. (2008). Nobel laureate Paul Krugman cites Asimov’s Foundation series as inspiration. Daily Kos, 14 October. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2008/10/14/629944/.
  24. Levinson, P. & Jandrić, P. (2016). From media theory to space odyssey: Petar Jandrić interviews Paul Levinson. Amazon Kindle.Google Scholar
  25. Levinson, P., & Waltemathe, M. (Eds.). (2015). Touching the face of the cosmos: On the intersection of space travel and religion. Amazon: Kindle.Google Scholar
  26. Lindgren, A. (1950). Pippi Longstocking. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  27. Locke. J. (1690). An essay concerning human understanding. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/locke1690book1.pdf.
  28. McLuhan, M. (1974). At the moment of Sputnik the planet became a global theatre in which there are no spectators but only actors. Journal of Communication, 24(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLuhan, M., Hutchon, K., & McLuhan, E. (1977). City as classroom: Understanding language and media. Agincourt, Canada: The Book Society of Canada.Google Scholar
  30. McMaster Bujold, L. (1986). Vorkosigan saga. Wake Forest, NC: Baen Books.Google Scholar
  31. Medawar, P. (1973). The hope of progress: A scientist looks at problems in philosophy, literature and science. New York, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  32. Meyrowitz, J. (1987). No sense of place: The impact of the electronic media on social behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Minsky, M. (1986). The society of mind. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  34. Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2017). The digital university: A dialogue and manifesto. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  36. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Postman. N. (1982/1994). The disappearance of childhood. London, UK: Vintage.Google Scholar
  38. Renaud, C. (2016). The secret life of pets [Motion picture]. Los Angeles: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
  39. Reshe, J. (2017). The changing child. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rilla, W. (1960). Village of the damned [Motion picture]. Los Angeles: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, K. S. (1992). Red Mars. London, UK: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, K. S. (1993). Green Mars. New York, NY: Bantam Spectra.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, K. S. (1996). Blue Mars. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  44. Spielberg, S. (1977). Close encounters of the third kind [Motion picture]. London: EMI Films.Google Scholar
  45. Spinrad, N. (1990). Science fiction in the real world. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Star Trek (2017). Home. Retrieved November 29, 2017 from http://www.startrek.com/.
  47. Taylor, A., & Jandrić, P. (2016). Unschoolers of the world, unwork! Grassroots lessons and strategies against 21st century capitalism. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 14(3), 131–153.Google Scholar
  48. The walking dead (2017). Home. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from http://www.amc.com/shows/the-walking-dead.
  49. Tolkien, J. R. R. (1954). The lord of the rings. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  50. Vonnegut, K. (1963). Cat’s cradle. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  51. Walton, D. (n. d.). Three laws lethal. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  52. Wark, M., & Jandrić, P. (2016). New knowledge for a new planet: Critical pedagogy for the Anthropocene. Open Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 148–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wyndham, J. (1957). The Midwich cuckoos. London, UK: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fordham UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Zagreb University of Applied SciencesZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations