Advertisement

Oncological Outcome After Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer

  • Bogdan Vasile MicuEmail author
  • C. M. Micu
  • D. Chirila
  • H. Silaghi
  • R. A. Iusan
  • M. S. Muresan
  • T. R. Pop
  • C. Ionescu
  • N. Constantea
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 71)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess and analyse the oncologic postoperative outcome of patients after robotic surgery for rectal cancer We conducted a study on patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery at the 5th Surgery Clinic of the Municipal Clinical Hospital in Cluj-Napoca between January 2010 and December 2013 and evaluated postoperative survival after 5 year follow-up. There were 10 patients, median age was 62 ± 11 years. Five anterior rectal resections, three lower rectal resections and two abdominoperineal resections were performed. Most tumors were stage III (6 cases). Of the patients included in the study, 7 patients survived and 3 patients died during the 5-year follow-up period. Survival at 5 years after robotic surgery was similar to open or laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery may be an alternative to laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer, especially with regard to the identification and preservation of nerve plexuses and dissection in a narrow pelvis with similar oncologic outcome.

Keywords

Rectal cancer Robotics Surgery Minimally invasive Survival 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Baik, S.H., Ko, Y.T., Kang, C.M., Lee, W.J., Kim, N.K., Sohn, S.K., et al.: Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg. Endosc. 22, 1601–1608 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baik, S.H.: Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med. J. 49, 891–896 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Micu, B., Micu, C., Leucuta, D.C., Crivii, C., Constantea, N.: The role and prognostic impact of lymph node ratio on stage III colorectal cancer. Clujul Med. 86(3), 245–249 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, C.N., Bae, S.U., Lee, S.G., Yang, S.H., Hyun, I.G., Jang, J.H., et al.: Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 31(4), 843–852 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hellan, M., Ouellette, J., Lagares-Garcia, J.A., Rauh, S.M., Kennedy, H.L., Nicholson, J.D., et al.: Robotic rectal cancer resection: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22(7), 2151–2158 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park, S., Kim, N.K.: The role of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: overcoming technical challenges in laparoscopic surgery by advanced techniques. Korean Med. Sci. 30(7), 837–846 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Araujo, S.E., Seid, V.E., Klajner, S.: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes. World J. Gastroenterol. 20(39), 14359–14370 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feroci, F., Vannucchi, A., Bianchi, P.P., Cantafio, S., Garzi, A., Formisano, G., Scatizzi, M.: Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs robotic surgery. World J. Gastroenterol. 22(13), 3602–3610 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crolla, R.M.P.H., Tersteeg, J.J.C., van der Schelling, G.P., Wijsman, J.H., Schreinemakers, J.M.J.: Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of clinical T4b tumours of distal sigmoid and rectum: initial results. Surg. Endosc., 16 May 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6210-4
  10. 10.
    Pinar, I., Fransgaard, T., Thygesen, L.C., Gögenur, I.: Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6862-2
  11. 11.
    Fransgaard, T., Pinar, I., Thygesen, L.C., Gögenur, I.: Association between robot-assisted surgery and resection quality in patients with colorectal cancer. Surg. Oncol. 27(2), 177–184 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2018.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Jesus, J.P., Valadão, M., de Castro Araujo, R.O., Cesar, D., Linhares, E., Iglesias, A.C.: The circumferential resection margins status: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 42(6), 808–812 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bogdan Vasile Micu
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. M. Micu
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Chirila
    • 1
  • H. Silaghi
    • 1
  • R. A. Iusan
    • 3
  • M. S. Muresan
    • 1
  • T. R. Pop
    • 1
  • C. Ionescu
    • 1
  • N. Constantea
    • 1
  1. 1.5th Surgical Department“Iuliu Hateganu” University of Medicine and PharmacyCluj-NapocaRomania
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy and Embryology“Iuliu Hateganu” University of Medicine and PharmacyCluj-NapocaRomania
  3. 3.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringTechnical University of Cluj NapocaCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations