Advertisement

Rehabilitation of Orthopedic and Neuropsychological Complications After Hip Arthroplasty

  • A. M. CulaiEmail author
  • P. Mihancea
  • I. Onac
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 71)

Abstract

After hip arthroplasty can occur morphological, functional and psychological complications, as a result of a complex of determinants. Preserving a good quality of life must be our first aim. Rehabilitation is one of the major key in preventing and treating. From a health perspective, the existence of one or more limitations due to physical or mental impairment, has a major impact over the quality of life is strictly related and reduced well-being during illness.

Keywords

Hip arthroplasty Pain Rehabilitation Dysfunctional attitudes 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Hollon, S., Kendal, P. (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., Weintraub, J.K.: Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 56(2), 267–283 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garellick, G., Malchau, H., Herberts, P.: Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement: a comparison between the Harris Hip Score and the Nottingham Health Profile. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 80, 600–606 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4341-7: Complications of total hip arthroplasty: standardized list, definitions, and stratification developed
  5. 5.
    King, L.: Case study: physical therapy management of hip osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Phys. Therapy. (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg, M.E., Lotke, P.A.: Postoperative management of total joint replacement. Orthop. Clinic. Norh. Am. (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antonescu, D.M.: Patologia Aparatului Locode recuperare, Edit. Medicală, Bucureşti, 1987. motor vol. II, Edit. Medicală, Bucureşti, p. 847 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliot (1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Selye (1968, 1980)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenberg, 1965Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Filip, N., Balazsi, R., Ciulei, R., et al.: Studiu comparativ al evoluţiei pacienţilor cu artroplastie totală de şold practicată pe abord chirugical minim invaziv vs. clasic: date preliminarii. Clujul Med. 85, 476–482 ( 2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    David, Holdevici, Szamoskozi, Băban (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Macavei, B.: Dysfunctional attitudes scale, form a; norms for the romanian population. J. Cogn. Behav. Psychother. 6(2) (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pablo et all; Vilardo and Shah, 2011Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Filip, N., Ciulei, R., Pocol, P., Georgescu, A.: Palestrica Mileniului III—Civilizație și Sport, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 234–240. Iulie-Septembrie 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Wiklund, I., Romanus, B.: A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J. Bone Joint Surg. 73A, 765–769 (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.“Iuliu Haţieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-NapocaCluj-NapocaRomania
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine OradeaOradeaRomania

Personalised recommendations