Advertisement

Evaluating a Method of Offline Detection of P3 Waves

  • Dorina AncăuEmail author
  • Nicolae-Marius Roman
  • Mircea Ancău
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 71)

Abstract

Interest in using portable devices in neuroscience applications for people with serious motoric deficits has been growing in the last few years. The Emotiv EPOC+ headset is one such device. This study aimed to assess the ability of this headset to determine event-related potentials and especially P3. Four healthy subjects participated in this experiment during which the headset recorded potential evoked by auditory and visual stimuli. The method, the program of stimuli, the results of the measurements as well as the statistical approaches have already been established in previous studies. The measurements were performed with the headset and the software TestBench attached to the device. Data analysis was performed offline on electrodes FC5, FC6, F3, F4, P7, P8, O1 and O2. The Emotiv EPOC+ headset was capable to distinguish the characteristic deflections of the P3 component of event-related potentials. Even across a small number of subjects and trials the high signal-to-noise ratio of the device did not preclude a statistically significant result. The result obtained can be considered as a first step in determining P3 or other ERP components using Emotiv EPOC+.

Keywords

Emotiv EPOC+ Event-related potential (ERP) P3 Brain-computer interface (BCI) 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Ramadan, Rabie A., Vasilakos, Athanasios V.: Brain computer interface: control signals review. Neurocomputing 223, 26–44 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lievesley, R., Wozencroft, M., David Ewins, D.: The Emotiv EPOC neuroheadset: an inexpensive method of controlling assistive technologies using facial expressions and thoughts? J. Assist. Technol. 5, 67–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Debener, S., Minow, F., et al.: How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk? Psychophysiology 49, 1617–1621 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Vos, et al.: P300 speller BCI with a mobile EEG system: comparison to a traditional amplifier. J. Neural Eng. vol. 11, (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/036008
  5. 5.
    Duvinage, M., et al.: Performance of the Emotiv EPOC headset for P300-based applications. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 12, 56 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Badcock, N.A. et al. Validation of the Emotiv EPOC EEG system for research quality auditory event-related potentials in children (2015).  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.907
  7. 7.
    Luck, S.J.: An Introduction to the event-related potential technique, 2nd edn, pp. 95–102, MIT Press (2014). ISBN 978-0-262-52585-5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekanayake, H.: P300 and Emotiv EPOC: Does Emotiv EPOC capture real EEG? (2010). http://neurofeedback.visaduma.info

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorina Ancău
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicolae-Marius Roman
    • 1
  • Mircea Ancău
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringTechnical University of Cluj-NapocaCluj-NapocaRomania
  2. 2.Faculty of Machine BuildingTechnical University of Cluj-NapocaCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations