Advertisement

One Aspect of Civil Procedure Reform in Asia: Placing the Focus upon Vietnam

  • Shiro KawashimaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research book series (KUMSSSR)

Abstract

In recent years there has been significant economic development in Southeast Asia. The rapid development of the market economy unavoidably demands the sharing of common rules that cross national borders and the development of systems to meet those needs.

References

  1. Asaka, K. (2016). Amerika minji tezuzukihou, dai 3 han (American civil procedural law (3rd ed.). Tokyo: Koubundou.Google Scholar
  2. Chayes, A. (1976). The role of the judge in public law litigation. Harvard Law Review, 89, 1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Damaška, M. R. (1986). The faces of justice and state authority: A comparative approach to the legal process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dang, Q. P. (2005). lecture: Betonamu minji soshouhou no seitei to shikou ni okeru Betonamu saikou jinmin saibansho no yakuwari (Role of the supreme people’s court in the enactment and operation of Vietnam’s civil procedure code). ICD News, 20, 32–38.Google Scholar
  5. Fuller, Lon L. (1978). The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirai, Y. (2010). Houritsugaku kisoron no kenkyuu (Research of fundamental legal theory). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
  7. Inaba, K. (2008). Houseibi shien jigyou no ima (Current legal system development support projects). Jurist (1358).Google Scholar
  8. Inoue, H. (1993). Minji tezuzukiron (Civil process theory). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
  9. International Cooperation Department, Ministry of Justice. (2005). Houseibi shien katsudou nenhyou (Annual table of legal system development support). ICD News, 20, 196–197.Google Scholar
  10. Iseki, M. (2005). Nihonhou to Hikakushite no Tokuchou; Saibankan, Kantokushin, Kinkyuu Hozen Shobun (Features compared to Japanese law; Judges, cassation and emergency preservation disposition). ICD News, 21, 58–90.Google Scholar
  11. Iseki, M. (2006). Betonamu minji soshouhou no shourai no mondai (Future issues for Vietnam’s civil procedure code). ICD News, 26, 13–26.Google Scholar
  12. Kagawa, K., & Kaneko, Y. (Eds.). (2007). Houseibi shien ron; Seido kouchiku no kokusai kyouryoku nyuumon (Legal system development support theory; Introduction to international support of system development). Tokyo: Minerva Shobo.Google Scholar
  13. Kaino, M. (2001). “Houseibi shien” to hikakuhougaku no kadai (Legal system development support and comparative law issues). Asia Keizai, 42(1), 52–62. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40000088038.
  14. Kaneko, Y. (2010). Ajia no houseibi to houhatten (Asian legal system development and legal development). University Education Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kawashima, S. (2001). Houseibi shien to sono purosesu wo tsuujita naisei-teki shiza no kakutoku; Minji soshou hou kenkyuusha no shiten kara (Acquisition of introspective viewpoints from legal system development support and its process; Viewpoint from a civil procedure law researcher). ICD News, 48, 1–4.Google Scholar
  16. Kawashima, S. (2007). Nihon ni okeru houseibi shien no kadai to tenbou ni tsuite (Issues and views regarding Japanese legal system development support). Housei Kenkyuu, 73(4), 685–714.Google Scholar
  17. Kawashima, S. (2013). Minji soshouhou (Civil procedure law). Tokyo: Nihon Hyoron Sha.Google Scholar
  18. Kawashima, S. (2016). Koukyou soshou no kyuusai houri (Jurisprudence of relief in institutional reform litigation). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
  19. Kusano, Y. (2003). Wakai gijutsuron, dai 2 han (Conciliation techniques theory (2nd ed.). Tokyo: Shinzansha.Google Scholar
  20. Maruyama, T. (2005). Betonamu minji soshouhou seitei; Waga kuni no kisou shien (Vietnam’s civil procedure law enactment; Japan’s drafting support). ICD News, 21, 5–9.Google Scholar
  21. Ozaki, M. (2002). Houmusho Sougou Kenkyuusho Kokusai Kyouryoku-bu ni okeru min-shouji hou wo chuushinn ni shita houseibi shien katsudou ni tsuite (Legal system development support centered upon civil and commercial law by the International Cooperation Department of the Ministry of Justice’s Research and Training Institute). Hou no Shihai, 126, 5–16.Google Scholar
  22. Sakai, H. (2005). Betonamu minji soshouhou seitei; Hishou/kokusai minji soshouhou oyobi hanketsu shikou tezuzuki no gaisetsu (Establishment of Vietnam’s civil procedure code; Outline of non-contentious cases, international civil procedure law and judgment execution processes). ICD News, 21, 85.Google Scholar
  23. Sakai, H. (2006). Betonamu minji soshouhou no shourai no kaisei mondai (Future revision issues for Vietnam’s civil procedure code). ICD News, 26, 27.Google Scholar
  24. Sakai, N. (2016). 2015 nen Betonamu minji soshouhou no gaiyou (Outline of Vietnam’s 2105 civil procedure code). 68 ICD News, (68), 43.Google Scholar
  25. Takada, H., Miki, K., Yamamoto, K., & Yamamoto, K. (2016). Chuushaku minji soshouhou, dai 5 kan (Annotated code of civil procedure, Vol. 5). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
  26. Taniguchi, Y. (2013). Minji Tezuzukihou no Kiso Riron I (Minji Tezuzukihou Ronshuu – Dai 1 Kan) (Basic theory of civil procedure 1 (Essays on civil procedure – Vol. 1). Tokyo: Shinzansha (Originally published in 1970).Google Scholar
  27. Tatara, S. (2013). Kaisei Betonamu minji soshouhou no gaiyou (Outline of Vietnam’s revised civil procedure code). In JICA, Technical Assistance for the Legal and Judicial System Reform (Ed) Betnamu roppou (Vietnam law code).Google Scholar
  28. Yoshimura, T. (2005). Betonamu minji soshouhou seitei; Seiritsu no haikei to tokuchou—Dai-Ichi Shin ni okeru shinri tezuzuki wo chuushinn toshite (Establishment of Vietnam’s civil procedure code; Background to realization and its features, focused upon the trial process at first instance). ICD News, 21, 10–57.Google Scholar
  29. Yoshimura, T. (2006). Betonamu minji soshouhou no kongo no kadai; Nihon minji soshouhou tono hikakuhouteki shiten kara (Future issues for Vietnam’s civil procedure code; From a comparative law viewpoint of comparison with Japan’s code of civil procedure). ICD News, 26, 2–12.Google Scholar
  30. Yoshimura, T. (2011). Hikaku minji tetsuzukihou (Comparative civil process law). Tokyo: Shinzansha.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawDoshisha UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations