Advertisement

Netnography

  • Krittinee NuttavuthisitEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Since the emergence of internet technology, it has continuously grown and expanded multiple opportunities from communications to social media, entertainment, e-commerce and many more. This development has led to increasing interest in online consumer and marketing research. Prior chapters described methods such as conducting individual interviews and focus group interviews via online channels. However these represent only an extension of the current data collection techniques using new channel of communications. But as people today spend a lot of time interacting in the online world, the online social setting has become another important area to explore, particularly with extensively rich qualitative data such as people’s conversations, blogs, comments, photos and video sharing. Moreover, it has provided a platform for people around the world to connect and form a new type of community.

References

  1. Abosag I, Tynan C, Lewis C (2002) Relationship marketing: the interaction of cultural value dimensions. Paper presented at academy of marketing annual conference, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham, 2–5 July 2002Google Scholar
  2. Arnold SJ, Fischer E (1994) Hermeneutics and consumer research. J Consum Res 21:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boellstorff T, Nardi B, Pearce C, Taylor TL (2012) Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of method. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Z, Liu P, Wang X, Gu Y (2012) Follow whom? Chinese users have different choice. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.0167.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
  5. Duan J, Dholakia N (2015) The reshaping of Chinese consumer values in the social media era: exploring the impact of Weibo. Qual Mark Res Int J 18(4):409–426.  https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2014-0058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Escobar A (1994) Welcome to Cyberia: notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. Curr Anthropol 35:211–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernback J (1999) There is a there there: notes toward a definition of cybercommunity. In: Jones S (ed) Doing internet research: critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould SJ (2012) The emergence of consumer introspection theory (CIT): introduction to a JBR special issue. J Bus Res 65(4):453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossnickle J, Oliver R (2000) The handbook of online marketing research: knowing your customer using the net. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Guan K, Kohlbacher F (2016) Building online consumer communities the Xiaomi way view 11 November 2017 from http://www.chinaeconomicreview.com/building-online-consumer-communities-xiaomi-way. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
  11. Hine C (2000) Virtual ethnography. Sage Publications, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hjorth L (2009) Mobile media in the Asia-Pacific: gender and the art of being mobile. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu Y, Liao X, Wu A (2012) A time sequence analysis on the informal information flow mechanism of microblogging. Chinese J Libr Inf Sci 4:68–81Google Scholar
  14. Hughes H (2000) Arts entertainment and tourism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Jing Z, Ho PSY (2011) Chinese women and the cyberspace. Woman University Press, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozinets R (1999) E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. Eur Manag J 17(3):252–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kozinets R (2000) Technoculture and the future of audio entertainment. White paper commissioned by Interep and presented to the NAB Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Kozinets R (2002) The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. J Mark Res 39:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kozinets R (2006) Click to connect: netnography and tribal advertising. J Advertising Res 46:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kozinets RV (2010a) Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  21. Kozinets RV (2010b) Observation methods. Wiley Int Encycl Mark 2:219–226Google Scholar
  22. Kozinets RV (2015) Netnography: redefined. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kozinets RV, Kedzior R (2009) I, Avatar: auto-netnographic research in virtual worlds. In: Solomon Michael, Wood Natalie (eds) Virtual social identity and consumer behavior. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  24. Langer R, Beckman SC (2005) Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited. Qual Market Res Int J 8(2):189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee DH (2013) Smartphones, mobile social space, and new sociality in Korea. Mob Media Commun 1(3):269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee YO (2016) Tweets in the limelight. In: Lim SS, Soriano C (eds) Asian perspectives on digital culture: emerging phenomena, enduring concepts. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim SS (2015) On stickers and communicative fluidity in social media. Social Media + Society 1(1):1–3Google Scholar
  28. Lim SS, Basnyat I (2016) Face and online social networking. In: Lim SS, Soriano C (eds) Asian perspectives on digital culture: emerging phenomena, enduring concepts. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu J, Qiu Y (2013) Microblogging and social change in China Asian. Perspective 37:305–331.  https://doi.org/10.5555/0258-9184-37.3.305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller D, Don S (2000) The Internet: an ethnographic approach. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Qiu JL, Chan JM (2004) China Internet studies: a review of the field. In: Nissenbaum HF, Price ME (eds) Academy & the internet. Peter Lang, New York, pp 275–307Google Scholar
  32. Rheingold H (1993) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, Addison-Wesley, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  33. Russell WB (2013) Consumer insights for developing markets. J Indian Bus Res 5:6–9.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17554191311303349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaffer K, Song X (2007) Unruly spaces: gender, women’s writing and indigenous feminism in China. J Gend Stud 16(1):17–30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230601116125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharf B (1999) Beyond netiquette: the ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In: Jones S (ed) Doing Internet research. Critical Issues and methods for examining the net. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi, pp 243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shoham A (2004) Flow experiences and image making: an online chat-room ethnography. Psychology and Marketing 21(10):855–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sterne J (1999) Thinking the Internet: cultural studies versus the millennium. In: Jones S (ed) Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 257–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Dijk TA (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse Society 4:249–283Google Scholar
  39. Weijo H, Hietanen J, Mattila P (2014) New insights into online consumption communities and netnography. J Bus Res 67:2072–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yoon K (2015) Diasporic apps? An ethnography of young South Korean migrants’ use of communication apps. In: The annual conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  41. Yoon K (2016) The local sociality and emotion of Jeong in Koreans’ media practices. In: Lim SS, Soriano C (eds) Asian perspectives on digital culture: emerging phenomena, enduring concepts. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang Y, Hitchcock MJ (2017) The Chinese female tourist gaze: a netnography of young women’s blogs on Macao. Curr Issues Tourism 20(3):315–330.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.904845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sasin Graduate Institute of Business AdministrationChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations