Advertisement

Digital Technologies, Legal Design and the Future of the Legal Profession

  • Marcelo CorralesEmail author
  • Mark Fenwick
  • Helena Haapio
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation book series (PLBI)

Abstract

Legal Technology—or “Legal Tech”—is disrupting the traditional operations and self-understanding of the legal profession. This chapter introduces the central claim of this book, namely that these developments are having and will continue to have a disruptive effect on the work of lawyers and that adapting to this new operating environment is crucial for legal professionals remaining relevant in an increasingly technology-driven world. The chapter outlines some of the main features of this on-going transformation process, describes some of the pressures it is creating for lawyers, and provides short summaries of the chapters that comprise this collection.

Keywords

Legal Tech Blockchain Smart contracts Cryptocurrency Legal design Legal profession 

References

  1. Asharaf S, Adarsh S (2017) Decentralized computing using blockchain technologies and smart contracts: emerging research and opportunities. Information Science Reference (IGI Global), HersheyGoogle Scholar
  2. Blank S (2017) Why lawyers don’t run startups. https://thinkgrowth.org/why-lawyers-dont-run-startups-25c5e0c877ed. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  3. Bues M-M, Matthaei E (2017) LegalTech on the rise: technology changes legal work behaviors, but does not replace its profession. In: Jacob K, Schindler D, Strathausen R (eds) Liquid legal: transforming legal into a business savvy, information enabled and performance driven industry. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  4. Creative Commons (n.d.) About the licenses. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  5. Cummins T (2016) Can contracts really change? IACCM/Commitment Matters Blog, 2 March. https://www2.iaccm.com/resources/?id=9147. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  6. Drescher D (2017) Blockchain basics: a non-technical introduction in 25 steps. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haapio H (2006) Business success and problem prevention through proactive contracting. In: Wahlgren P (ed) A Proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, vol 49. Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, Stockholm. http://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-9.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  8. Haapio H (2013) Next generation contracts: a paradigm shift. Lexpert Ltd., HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  9. Haapio H, Passera S (in press) Contracts as interfaces: exploring visual representation patterns in contract design. In: Katz MJ, Dolin RA, Bommarito M (eds) Legal informatics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagan M (n.d.) Law by design. http://www.lawbydesign.co. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  11. Hazard J, Haapio H (2017) Wise contracts: smart contracts that work for people and machines. In: Schweighofer E et al (eds) Trends and communities of legal informatics. Proceedings of the 20th international legal informatics symposium IRIS 2017. Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft. http://books@ocg.at, WienGoogle Scholar
  12. Howarth D (2013) Law as engineering—thinking about what lawyers do. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang P (2015) A dissection of bitcoin. Lulu.com, s. l.Google Scholar
  14. Kosba A et al (2015) Hawk: the blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. https://www.weusecoins.com/as-sets/pdf/library/Hawk%20%20The%20Blockchain%20Model%20of%20Cryptography%20and%20Privacy-Preserving%20Smart%20Contracts.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
  15. Kost de Sevres (2016) The blockchain revolution, smart contracts and financial transactions. https://www.dlapiper.com/en/uk/insights/publications/2016/04/the-blockchain-revolution/. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
  16. LeDA/Legal Design Alliance (n.d.) https://www.legaldesignalliance.org. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  17. Linthicum D (2016) Linking up blockchain and cloud. https://www.cloudtp.com/doppler/linking-blockchain-cloud/. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
  18. Lipshaw J-M (2018) The persistence of ‘dumb’ contracts. Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 18–11, 25 June, last revised 6 Sep (Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, 2019, Forthcoming). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3202484. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  19. Morabito V (2017) Business innovation through blockchain: the B3 perspective. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mougayar W (2015) Understanding the blockchain: we must be prepared for the blockchain’s promise to become a new development environment. https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/understanding-the-blockchain. Accessed 16 May 2017
  21. Prusty N (2017) Building blockchain projects: develop real-time practical DApps using Ethereum and JavaScript. Packt Publishing, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  22. Siedel G, Haapio H (2011) Proactive law for managers: a hidden source of competitive advantage. Gower, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  23. Swan M (2015) Blockchain: blueprint for a new economy, 1st edn. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (CA)Google Scholar
  24. Stark J (2016) How close are smart contracts to impacting real-world Law? http://www.coindesk.com/blockchain-smarts-contracts-real-world-law/. Accessed 16 May 2016
  25. Szabo N (1997a) Contracts with bearer. http://szabo.best.vwh.net/bearer_contracts.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2017
  26. Szabo N (1997b) The idea of smart contracts. http://szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_con-tracts_idea.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2017
  27. The Economist (2015b) Bitcoin: the next big thing. http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21650295-or-it-next-big-thing. Accessed 15 May 2016
  28. Tomas P (2017) Cryptocurrency 101: a beginners guide. PronounGoogle Scholar
  29. Walch A (2018) Open-source operational risk: should public blockchains serve as financial market infrastructures? In: Lee D, Deng R (eds) Handbook of blockchain, digital finance, and inclusion, vol 3. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Waller R, Haapio H, Passera S (2017) Contract simplification: the why and the how. Contract Excell J (July 24). http://journal.iaccm.com/contracting-excellence-journal/contract-simplification-the-why-and-the-how. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  31. Wattenhofer R (2016) The science of the blockchain. Inverted Forest Publishing, s. l.Google Scholar
  32. Weber I et al (2016) Untrusted business process monitoring and execution using blockchain. In: La Rosa M, Loos P, Pastor O (eds) Business process management, 14th international conference, BPM 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September 18–22, 2016, proceedings. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams D (2017) Cryptocurrency compendium: a reference for cryptocurrencies. Lulu.com

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of European and American StudiesAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Faculty of Law, Graduate School of LawKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.School of Accounting and FinanceUniversity of Vaasa, Business LawVaasaFinland

Personalised recommendations