Reconsidering Induced Value Theory
Why we should pay real monetary rewards to subjects in the laboratory experiment? This question is often raised not only by researchers of different disciplines such as psychology but also by our fellow economics researchers who are not so familiar with experimental methods.
- Azrieli, Y., Chambers, C. P., & Healy, P. J. (2016). Incentives in experiments: a theoretical analysis. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Bade, S. (2014). Randomization devices and the elicitation of ambiguity averse preferences. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Baillon, A., Halevy, Y., & Li, C. (2015). Experimental elicitation of ambiguity attitude using the random incentive system. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Chandrasekhar, A. G., & Xandri, J. P. (2011). A note on payments in experiments of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76, 508–515.Google Scholar
- Kuzmics, C. (2013). A rational ambiguity averse person will never display her ambiguity aversion. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Laury, S. K. (2005). Pay one or pay all: rndom selection of one choice for payment. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Oechssler, J., & Roomets, A. (2013) Unintended hedging in ambiguity experiments. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley.Google Scholar
- Smith, V. L. (1976). Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66, 274–279.Google Scholar
- Smith, V. L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review, 72, 923–955.Google Scholar
- Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wakker, P. P. (2007). Message to referees who want to embark on yet another discussion of the random-lottery incentive system for individual choice. https://personal.eur.nl/wakker/miscella/debates/randomlinc.htm.