Advertisement

Diversity of Experimental Methods in Economics: An Introduction

  • Toshiji Kawagoe
  • Hirokazu TakizawaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Experimental methods have long been thought of as irrelevant and useless to economic research. To the best of our knowledge, this idea was explicitly stated for the first time by John Stuart Mill in the middle of the nineteenth century.

References

  1. Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  2. Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chamberlin, E. H. (1948). An experimental imperfect market. The Journal of Political Economy, 56, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, R. (1935/1971). The design of experiments (9th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Flood, M. (1958). Some experimental games. Management Science, 5, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Guala, F. (2005). The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2008). The case for mindless economics. In A. Caplin & Andrew Schotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics (pp. 3–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heukelom, F. (2014). Behavioral economics: a history. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahnemann, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. List, J. (2006). Field experiments: A bridge between lab and naturally occurring data. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 6, Article 8.Google Scholar
  15. Mill, J. S. (2007/1836). On the definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of ‘Investigation Proper to It. In Collected works of John Stuart Mill (Vol. 4). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  16. Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London, UK: McMillan & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Roth, A. (1986). Laboratory experimentation in economics. Economics and Philosophy, 2, 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roth, A. (1993). The early history of experimental economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15, 184–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Samuelson, P., & Nordhaus, W. (1985). Economics. New York: McGrow-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Schotter, A. (2008). What’s so informative about choice? In A. Caplin & A. Schotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics: A handbook (pp. 70–94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siegel, S. (1953). Certain determinants and correlates of authoritarianism. Department of Psychology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, V. (1976). Experimental economics: Induced value theory. In The American Economic Review, Paper and Proceedings of the Eighty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (Vol. 66, pp. 274–279).Google Scholar
  24. Smith, V. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. The American Economic Review, 72, 923–955.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, V. (1989). Theory, experiment and economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, V. (2008). Rationality in economics: Constructivist and ecological forms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Svorenčik, A., & Maas, H. (2016). The making of experimental economics: Witness seminar on the emergence of a field. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. von Wright, G. (2004). Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), University of California Press. Berkeley: CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Future University HakodateHokkaidoJapan
  2. 2.Chuo UniversityHachioji, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations