Advertisement

Introduction

  • Chang-Ki Moon
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

Molecular orientation is an important factor in determining the electrical and optical properties of organic semiconductors. The molecular alignment of liquid crystals has long been significant for applications in flat panel displays.

References

  1. 1.
    Raynes P (1993) LIQUID CRYSTALS—Second Edition, by S CHANDRASEKHAR, Cambridge University Press, (1992), ISBN 0-521-41747-3 (HB), ISBN 0-521-42741-X (PB). Liq Cryst Today 3:7–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13583149308628627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yeh P, Gu C (2010) Optics of liquid crystal displays, vol 67. WileyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McBranch D, Campbell I, Smith D, Ferraris J (1995) Optical determination of chain orientation in electroluminescent polymer films. Appl Phys Lett 66:1175–1177ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim J-S, Ho PKH, Greenham NC, Friend RH (2000) Electroluminescence emission pattern of organic light-emitting diodes: implications for device efficiency calculations. J Appl Phys 88:1073–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.373779ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith LH, Wasey JAE, Samuel IDW, Barnes WL (2005) Light out-coupling efficiencies of organic light-emitting diode structures and the effect of photoluminescence quantum yield. Adv Func Mater 15:1839–1844.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200500283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin H-W et al (2004) Anisotropic optical properties and molecular orientation in vacuum-deposited ter(9,9-diarylfluorene)s thin films using spectroscopic ellipsometry. J Appl Phys 95:881–886.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1635991ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yokoyama D (2011) Molecular orientation in small-molecule organic light-emitting diodes. J Mater Chem 21:19187.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm13417eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yokoyama D, Sakaguchi A, Suzuki M, Adachi C (2008) Horizontal molecular orientation in vacuum-deposited organic amorphous films of hole and electron transport materials. Appl Phys Lett 93:173302.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2996258ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sasabe H et al (2011) Influence of substituted pyridine rings on physical properties and electron mobilities of 2-methylpyrimidine skeleton-based electron transporters. Adv Func Mater 21:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayr C, Brütting W (2015) Control of molecular dye orientation in organic luminescent films by the glass transition temperature of the host material. Chem Mater 27:2759–2762.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Komino T, Tanaka H, Adachi C (2014) Selectively controlled orientational order in linear-shaped thermally activated delayed fluorescent dopants. Chem Mater 26:3665–3671.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm500802pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Komino T, Nomura H, Koyanagi T, Adachi C (2013) Suppression of efficiency roll-off characteristics in thermally activated delayed fluorescence based organic light-emitting diodes using randomly oriented host molecules. Chem Mater 25:3038–3047.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm4011597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sirringhaus H et al (1999) Two-dimensional charge transport in self-organized, high-mobility conjugated polymers. Nature 401:685–688ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sundar VC et al (2004) Elastomeric transistor stamps: reversible probing of charge transport in organic crystals. Science 303:1644–1646ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erb T et al (2005) Correlation between structural and optical properties of composite polymer/fullerene films for organic solar cells. Adv Func Mater 15:1193–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taminiau T, Stefani F, Segerink F, Van Hulst N (2008) Optical antennas direct single-molecule emission. Nat Photonics 2:234–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duhm S et al (2008) Orientation-dependent ionization energies and interface dipoles in ordered molecular assemblies. Nat Mater 7:326–332ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamao T, Yamamoto K, Taniguchi Y, Miki T, Hotta S. (2008) Laser oscillation in a highly anisotropic organic crystal with a refractive index of 4.0. J Appl Phys 103:093115ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horiuchi S, Tokura Y (2008) Organic ferroelectrics. Nat Mater 7:357–366ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Horowitz G (1998) Organic field-effect transistors. Adv Mater 10:365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Janssen RA, Nelson J (2013) Factors limiting device efficiency in organic photovoltaics. Adv Mater 25:1847–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frischeisen J, Yokoyama D, Adachi C, Brütting W (2010) Determination of molecular dipole orientation in doped fluorescent organic thin films by photoluminescence measurements. Appl Phys Lett 96:073302.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3309705ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flämmich M et al (2011) Oriented phosphorescent emitters boost OLED efficiency. Org Electron 12:1663–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liehm P et al (2012) Comparing the emissive dipole orientation of two similar phosphorescent green emitter molecules in highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 101:253304ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim S-Y et al (2013) Organic light-emitting diodes with 30% external quantum efficiency based on a horizontally oriented emitter. Adv Func Mater 23:3896–3900.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim KH et al (2014) Phosphorescent dye-based supramolecules for high-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes. Nat Commun 5:4769.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mayr C et al (2014) Efficiency enhancement of organic light-emitting diodes incorporating a highly oriented thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitter. Adv Func Mater 24:5232–5239.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201400495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim KH et al (2015) Controlling emitting dipole orientation with methyl substituents on main ligand of iridium complexes for highly efficient phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes. Adv Opt Mater 3:1191–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim K-H, Ahn ES, Huh J-S, Kim Y-H, Kim J-J (2016) Design of heteroleptic Ir complexes with horizontal emitting dipoles for highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes with an external quantum efficiency of 38%. Chem Mater 28:7505–7510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jurow MJ et al (2016) Understanding and predicting the orientation of heteroleptic phosphors in organic light-emitting materials. Nat Mater 15:85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4428ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Komino T et al (2016) Electroluminescence from completely horizontally oriented dye molecules. Appl Phys Lett 108:241106.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4954163ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim SY et al (2013) Organic light-emitting diodes with 30% external quantum efficiency based on a horizontally oriented emitter. Adv Func Mater 23:3896–3900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moon C-K (2014) Analysis of orientation of the transition dipole moment of phosphorescent dyes in the energy-transferring condition. Master thesis, Seoul National UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Purcell EM (1946) Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequnecy. Phys Rev 69:681Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chance RR, Prock A, Silbey R (1978) Molecular fluorescence and energy transfer near interfaces. Adv Chem Phys 37:1–65Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barnes WL (1998) Fluorescence near interfaces: the role of photonic mode density. J Mod Opt 45:661–699.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349808230614ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wasey JAE, Barnes WL (2000) Efficiency of spontaneous emission from planar microcavities. J Mod Opt 47:725–741.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008233393ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neyts K (2005) Microcavity effects and the outcoupling of light in displays and lighting applications based on thin emitting films. Appl Surf Sci 244:517–523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.156ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Furno M, Meerheim R, Hofmann S, Lüssem B, Leo K (2012) Efficiency and rate of spontaneous emission in organic electroluminescent devices. Phys Rev B 85.  https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.85.115205
  40. 40.
    Kuhn H (1970) Classical aspects of energy transfer in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 53:101–108.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1673749ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tang CW, VanSlyke SA (1987) Organic electroluminescent diodes. Appl Phys Lett 51:913.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.98799ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Charalambos C, Katsidis DIS (2002) General transfer-matrix method for optical multilayer systems with coherent, partially coherent, and incoherent interference. Appl Opt 41:4978Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baldo MA et al (1998) Highly efficient phosphorescent emission from organic electroluminescent devices. Nature 395:151–154ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baldo MA, Lamansky S, Burrows PE, Thompson ME, Forrest SR (1999) Very high-efficiency green organic light-emitting devices based on electrophosphorescence. Appl Phys Lett 75:4–6.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.124258ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tsuboyama A et al (2003) Homoleptic cyclometalated iridium complexes with highly efficient red phosphorescence and application to organic light-emitting diode. J Am Chem Soc 125:12971–12979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lamansky S et al (2001) Highly phosphorescent bis-cyclometalated iridium complexes: synthesis, photophysical characterization, and use in organic light emitting diodes. J Am Chem Soc 123:4304–4312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schmidt TD et al (2011) Evidence for non-isotropic emitter orientation in a red phosphorescent organic light-emitting diode and its implications for determining the emitter’s radiative quantum efficiency. Appl Phys Lett 99:163302.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3653475ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lampe T et al (2016) Dependence of phosphorescent emitter orientation on deposition technique in doped organic films. Chem Mater 28:712–715.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kim KH, Moon CK, Lee JH, Kim SY, Kim JJ (2014) Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes with phosphorescent emitters having high quantum yield and horizontal orientation of transition dipole moments. Adv Mater 26:3844–3847.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Moon C-K, Kim K-H, Lee JW, Kim J-J (2015) Influence of host molecules on emitting dipole orientation of phosphorescent iridium complexes. Chem Mater 27:2767–2769.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shin H et al (2014) Blue phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes using an exciplex forming co-host with the external quantum efficiency of theoretical limit. Adv Mater 26:4730–4734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lee JH et al (2015) Finely tuned blue iridium complexes with varying horizontal emission dipole ratios and quantum yields for phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes. Adv Opt Mater 3:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Goushi K, Adachi C (2012) Efficient organic light-emitting diodes through up-conversion from triplet to singlet excited states of exciplexes. Appl Phys Lett 101:023306.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4737006ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liu W et al (2016) Novel strategy to develop exciplex emitters for high-performance OLEDs by employing thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials. Adv Func Mater 26:2002–2008.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201505014ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang-Ki Moon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Graduate SchoolSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations