Advertisement

A Concept-Synthesizing Construction Set for Bisociative Thinking

  • Deny Willy JunaidyEmail author
  • Yukari Nagai
  • Budi Isdianto
  • Shintaro Mori
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)

Abstract

We designed a puzzle to stimulate bisociative thinking. This puzzle is an educational tool to challenge children’s creativity using Koestler’s theory of bisociation, which means combining two dissimilar concepts that are not related to produce an unfamiliar and unconventional idea. We explored the possibility of mental imagery formation of a particular creature with physical-ontological puzzle components that rather being ambiguous are in the familiar form of head, body, and support. The absurdity of the puzzle components, e.g. head-body-like components, head-tail-like components, and fin-tail-horn-wing-like components, would reportedly encourage users to generate unexpected imaginary figures that activate imaginative storytelling skills: e.g. ‘A finned BIRD crawling in the ocean’, ‘A winged SNAKE swimming in the sky’, and ‘A footed FISH flying on land’. The puzzle combinations were observed qualitatively through storytelling (A: Animal; B: Body; C: Capability; D: Domain). The reports show that ambiguous figure combinations have the potential to create rich storytelling.

Keywords

Abstraction Puzzle design Creativity Bisociation Storytelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements are due to Research Center for Cultural Product and Environment (PPPBL-LPPM ITB) for the Research Excellence Grant (RU 2015). The Association for Advancement of Small Business (PROSPECT Program-PUPUK) and all of the members involved in this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Koestler, A.: The Act of Creation: A Study of the Conscious and Unconscious in Science and Art. Dell Publishing Company (1967)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Junaidy, D.W., Nagai, Y.: The characteristic of thought of digital architect. Int. J. Creat. Future Herit. (TENIAT) 5(1) (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: Blending as a central process of grammar. In: Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, vol. 113, p. 130 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Rech. Commun. 19(19), 57–86 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Varela, F.J.: The naturalization of phenomenology as the transcendence of nature: searching for generative mutual constraints. Alter: Rev. Phénom. 5, 355–381 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wisniewski, E.J.: Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. J. Mem. Lang. 35(3), 434–453 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagai, Y., Taura, T., Mukai, F.: Concept blending and dissimilarity: factors for creative concept generation process. Des. Stud. 30(6), 648–675 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins, A.M., Quillian, M.R.: Retrieval time from semantic memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8(2), 240–247 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dubitzky, W., Kötter, T., Schmidt, O., Berthold, M.R.: Towards creative information exploration based on Koestler’s concept of bisociation. In: Bisociative Knowledge Discovery, pp. 11–32. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosch, E.H.: Natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 4(3), 328–350 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lakoff, G.: Cognitive models and prototype theory. concepts: core readings. In: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, pp. 391–421. Psychology Press (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taura, T., Nagai, Y.: Concept Generation for Design Creativity: A Systematized Theory and Methodology. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deny Willy Junaidy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yukari Nagai
    • 2
  • Budi Isdianto
    • 1
  • Shintaro Mori
    • 2
  1. 1.Bandung Institute of TechnologyBandungIndonesia
  2. 2.Japan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNomiJapan

Personalised recommendations