Advertisement

A Thought on Models of Design Processes: Abstraction, Representation and Reality

  • Paul VargheseEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)

Abstract

Issues of epistemology/knowledge representation and how it functions in design is explored. Some categorisation methods are looked at, and how it can be used is studied. Definitional problems of ‘design’ are viewed, and an elementary classificatory system is proposed. One extends the argument to tackle issues of representation, and ways to rationalise the processes. Representational models, mostly logical, computational or cognitive, are explored.

Keywords

Three-worlds theory Knowledge representation Models of design 

References

  1. 1.
    Popper, K.: Three Worlds, Tanner Lecture at University of Michigan (1978) https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf
  2. 2.
    Mouton, J.: Understanding Social Research. Van Schaik Publishers, Pretoria, SA (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ackoff, R.L.: From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16, 39 (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varghese, P.: Shape algebras and rules in design: bridging the gap between formal and intuitive thinking. Architecture & Regional Planning, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Paul Varghese/IIT Kharagpur (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: Towards a situated function-behaviour-structure framework as the basis for a theory of designing. In: Smithers, T. (ed.) Workshop on Development and Application of Design Theories in AI in Design Research, Artificial Intelligence in Design’00. Worcester, MA, pp. gk:1–5 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bowker, J.: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wynn, D.C., Clarkson, P.J.: Process models in design and development. Res. Eng. Des. 29, 161–202 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Evans, J.H.: Basic design concepts. J. Am. Soc. Naval Eng. 71(4), 671–678 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall (1981)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crowley, K., Head, B.: The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: revisiting Rittel and Webber. Policy Sci. 50 (2017)  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9302-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clipson, C.: Simulation for planning and design. In: Marans, R.W., Stokols, D. (eds.) Environmental Simulation, pp. 30–34. Plenum Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, J.C.: Design Methods Reviewed, in the Design Method. S. A. Gregory/Butterworth, London (1966)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lawson, B.: How Designers Think. The Architectural Press, London (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peirce, C.S.: Chance, Love and Logic. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubnor, London (1923)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    March, L.: The Architecture of Form. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK (1976)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Magnani, L.: Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sturt, G.: The Wheelwright’s Shop. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1934/1963)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goel, V.: Sketches of Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldschmidt, G.: The dialectics of sketching. Creat. Res. J. 4(2), 123–143 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tversky, B.: What do sketches say about thinking? In Stahovic, T., Landay, J., Davis, R. (eds.) Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding. AAAI Technical Report SS-02-08. Menlo Park, CA (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pinker, S.: The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, Penguin Books (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karpagam Academy of Higher EducationCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations