Advertisement

Motivation for Do-It-Yourself in Rural Base of the Pyramid Communities and the Changing Landscape

  • Prarthana MajumdarEmail author
  • Sharmistha Banerjee
  • Jan-Carel Diehl
  • J. M. L. van Engelen
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)

Abstract

Making is a creative experience of imagination and tinkering through which one finds resourcefulness in surrounding objects and materials. The propensity to make has been widely studied through Ryan and Deci’s self-determination theory that sheds light on how makers are driven by intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors. However, most of these studies have focused on do-it-yourself (DIY) movements that originated in the West such as the maker movement, the steampunk movement, and regenerative living. In this paper, we focus on the Base of the Pyramid (BoP) community from rural India and present a study that investigates into the motivational tendencies that catalyze DIY in such communities. We studied DIY practices in five BoP communities in rural India (Assam, a northeastern state of India) through contextual enquiry using semi-structured interviews. In the light of practice theory that considers skills, images, and stuff as the three components of a practice, we analyzed the motivational factors that give meaning to DIY in rural BoP communities. Furthermore, the observed inter-generational trend(s) showed how the linkages between these interconnected elements are changing over time and how new meaning might be required for DIY practices to sustain in such communities.

Keywords

Making Do-it-yourself Intrinsic motivation Base of the Pyramid Practice Prosumption Rural BoP 

References

  1. 1.
    Prahalad, C.K.: The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Pearson Education India (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karani, A.: Fighting Poverty Together: Rethinking Strategies for Business, Governments, and Civil Society to Reduce Poverty. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    London, T.: A base-of-the-pyramid perspective on poverty alleviation. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Program. (Growing Inclusive Markets Working Paper Series) (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prahlad, C.K.: The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prahlad, C.K., Hart, S.L.: The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, 26, 2–14 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simanis, E., Hart, S.: Expanding Possibilities at the Base of the Pyramid. Innovations Technology Governance Globalization 1(1), 43–51 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson, J., Billou, N.: Serving the world’s poor: innovation at the base of the economic pyramid. J. Bus. Strategy 28(2), 14–21 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Frugal Innovation: Lessons from Carlos Ghosn, CEO, Renault-Nissan. Harvard Business Review Blog Network http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/07/frugal-innovationlessons-from/accessed on December, 3, 2013
  9. 9.
    Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O.: Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management 54(4), 38–45 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karnani, A.: The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: how the private sector can help alleviate poverty. Calif. Manage. Rev. 49(4), 90–111 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Landrum, N.E.: Advancing the “base of the pyramid” debate. Strateg. Manage. Rev. 1(1), 1–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chambers, R.: Whose Reality Counts, vol. 25. Intermediate technology publications, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ceschin, F., Gaziulusoy, I.: Evolution of design for sustainability: from product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Stud. 47, 118–163 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simanis, E., Hart, S.: Base of the Pyramid Protocol, 2nd edn. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toffler, A., Alvin, T.: The third wave, pp. 32–33. Bantam Books, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dougherty, D.: The maker movement. Innovations 7(3), 11–14 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fox, S.: Third Wave Do-It-Yourself (DIY): Potential for prosumption, innovation, and entrepreneurship by local populations in regions without industrial manufacturing infrastructure. Technol. Soc. 39, 18–30 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhaduri, S., Kumar, H.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivation of ‘grassroot’innovators in India. Mind Soc. 10(1), 27–55 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Birtchnell, T.: Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemp. S. Asia 19(4), 357–372 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gupta, A.K.: Theory of green grassaragraphroots frugal innovations. Anil gupta’s blog. Retrieved on 17th March 2017 from. http://anilg.sristi.org/theory-ofgreen-grassroots-frugalinnovations/
  21. 21.
    Products.: Leaf Republic. https://www.leaf-republic.com/. Accessed 2 May 2018
  22. 22.
    Chilewich Contract.: Chilewich. https://www.chilewich.com/contract/floor/custom_floor_mats/reed/seashell/ Accessed 2 May 2018
  23. 23.
    Breaux, C.: Why Making? Comput. Compos. 44, 27–35 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Majumdar, P., Banerjee, S.: Challenges to sustainable growth of the micro-scale Kuhila Craft industry of India. In: International Conference on Research into Design, pp. 267–276. Springer, Singapore (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levi-Strauss, C.: The savage mind. University of Chicago Press, IL (1966)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kiggundu, M.N., Ji, S.: Global growth companies in emerging economies: new champions, new challenges. J. Bus. Behav. Sci. 19(1), 70–90 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gupta, A.K., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P.,… & Chandan, A.: Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital. Futures, 35(9), 975–987 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gupta, A.K.: From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations Technol. Governance Globalization, 1(3), 49–66 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fields, D.A., Magnifico, A.M., Lammers, J.C., Curwood, J.S.: DIY media creation. J. Adolesc. Adult Literacy 58(1), 19–24 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Freeman, S.: Immersed In Pellet Technology: Motivation Paths of Innovative DIYers. Outlines Crit. Pract. Stud. 16(1), 54–80 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lakhani, K.R., Wolf, R.G.: Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Perspect. Free. Open Source Softw. 1, 3–22 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tanenbaum, J.G., Williams, A.M., Desjardins, A., Tanenbaum, K.: Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2603–2612. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Williams, C.C.: Re-thinking the motives of do-it-yourself (DIY) consumers. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 18(3), 311–323 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tanenbaum, J., Tanenbaum, K., Wakkary, R.: Steampunk as design fiction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1583–1592. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shove, E., Pantzar, M.: Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. J. Consum. Cult. 5(1), 43–64 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M.: The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. Sage (2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gradén, L.:Walking Nordic: performing space, place and identity. In Performing Nordic Heritage, pp. 44–69. Routledge (2016)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kuijer, S.C.: Implications of social practice theory for sustainable design (2014)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Blessing, L.T., Chakrabarti, A.: DRM: A Design Reseach Methodology, pp. 13–42. Springer, London (2009)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Labs. FabLabs.: https://www.fablabs.io/labs/map Accessed 2 May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prarthana Majumdar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharmistha Banerjee
    • 2
  • Jan-Carel Diehl
    • 1
  • J. M. L. van Engelen
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations