Advertisement

Ergonomic Postural and Biomechanical Analysis of Manual Weeding Operation in Agriculture Using Digital Human Models

  • Shadad Md Khayer
  • Thaneswer PatelEmail author
  • Bishorjit Ningthoujam
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)

Abstract

The agricultural land of India is approximately 181.95 million ha (55.3% of entire area) where the majority of the landholding (i.e. 78.92%) are in the category of a small and marginal group. Weed control is one of the most challenging and labour-intensive operations in agriculture utilizing about 20% of human energy and 25% of labour requirement. Further weeds alone reduce about 50–70% in crop yields. Manual weeding operation is most widely used by small and marginal landholding. Manual operation is associated with different types of health hazards, such as musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), pain in various body parts, injury, etc., among farmworker due to ignorance of the capabilities and limitations (anthropometric and biomechanical characteristics) of the potential user group in the design of tools and equipment. Moreover, practising manual and wheel hoe weeding required more human energy, i.e. vary from 300 to 400 man-h/ha and 50 to 125 man-h/ha, respectively. The present study attempted to evaluate existing manual weeding using wheel hoe in the digital environment, using digital human modelling (DHM) for the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The DHM has become commonly used for human-centred product design. The DHM tools have the potential to analyse and improve the product before it’s ever launched. Therefore, the emphasis in this paper is to investigate the postural and biomechanical behaviour in manual weeding practices for the various user group (i.e. 5th–95th percentiles) of Arunachal Pradesh. The outcome of the postural analysis found to be more discomfort rating for the larger group of population (i.e. 50th–95th percentiles) for male workers in wheel hoe operation. Further, the compressive forces on L4–L5 lumbar spines showed higher values for wheel hoe for both male and female. A similar type of approach using DHM for others existing agricultural tools and equipment would improve human comfort, safety and overall productivity.

Keywords

Weeding Wheel hoe MSD Drudgery DHM RULA score 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Saikia, A.: Performance of agricultural economy of the north eastern India: constraints and priorities. In: Workshop on prioritization of strategies for agricultural development in Northeastern India. Organized by National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NCAP) (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barah, B.C.: Northeastern India: strategies for agricultural development—an overview. Prioritization of Strategies for Agricultural Development in Northeastern India, 1 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nag, P.K., Chatterjee, S.K.: Physiological reactions of female workers in Indian agricultural work. Hum. Factors 23(5), 607–614 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nag, P.K., Nag, A.: Drudgery, accidents and injuries in Indian agriculture. Ind. Health 42(2), 149–162 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gite, L.P., Yadav, B.G.: Optimum handles height for a push-pull type manually-operated dryland weeder. Ergonomics 33(12), 1487–1494 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tewari, V.K., Datta, R.K., Murthy, A.S.R.: Evaluation of three manually operated weeding devices. Appl. Ergon. 22(2), 111–116 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demirel, H.O., Duffy, V.G.: Digital human modeling for product lifecycle management. In: International Conference on Digital Human Modeling, pp. 372–381. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel, T., Sanjog, J., Chatterjee, A., Shroff, A., Prusty, S.S., Mohapatra, S., Karmakar, S.: Virtual ergonomics evaluation of a design concept of manual powered portable paddy thresher suitable for hilly region agriculture. In: International Conference on Research into Design, pp. 503–512. Springer, Singapore (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rizzi, C., Bordegoni, M.: Innovation in Product Designs: From CAD to Virtual Prototyping. Springer, London (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dewangan, K.N., Kumar, G.P., Suja, P.L., Choudhury, M.D.: Anthropometric dimensions of farm youth of the north eastern region of India. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35(11), 979–989 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dewangan, K.N., Owary, C., Datta, R.K.: Anthropometric data of female farm workers from north eastern India and design of hand tools of the hilly region. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38(1), 90–100 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel, T., Sanjog, J., Karmakar, S.: Isometric handgrip strength of agricultural workers from northeast region of India. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 17(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vignais, N., Miezal, M., Bleser, G., Mura, K., Gorecky, D., Marin, F.: Innovative system for real-time ergonomic feedback in industrial manufacturing. Appl. Ergon. 44(4), 566–574 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meksawi, S., Tangtrakulwanich, B., Chongsuvivatwong, V.: Musculoskeletal problems and ergonomic risk assessment in rubber tappers: a community-based study in southern Thailand. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 42(1), 129–135 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24(2), 91–99 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dockrell, S., O’Grady, E., Bennett, K., Mullarkey, C., Mc Connell, R., Ruddy, R., Flannery, C.: An investigation of the reliability of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) as a method of assessment of children’s computing posture. Appl. Ergon. 43(3), 632–636 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bridger, R.:. Introduction to ergonomics. Crc Press (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chaffin, D.B., Andersson, G., Martin, B.J.: Occupational Biomechanics, pp. 91–130. Wiley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biomechanical guideline for occupational low back disorder prevention a field assessment and prevention guideline setup. Occupational Safety and Health Council, Jan 2005Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dewangan, K.N., Owary, C., Datta, R.K.: Anthropometry of male agricultural workers of north-eastern India and its use in design of agricultural tools and equipment. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40(5), 560–573 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agrawal, K.N., Singh, R.K.P., Satapathy, K.K.: Anthropometric considerations of farm tools/machinery design for tribal workers of northeastern India. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 12(1) (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karmakar, S., Majumdar, D., Pal, M.S., Majumdar, D.: Ergonomic study of ingress-egress of an army vehicle in simulated environment. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Trends in Product Lifecycle, Modeling, Simulation and Synthesis (PLMSS), Bangalore, India, pp. 69–74 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Naumann, A., Rötting, M.: Digital human modeling for design and evaluation of human-machine systems. MMI-Interaktiv 12, 27–35 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sanjog, J., Karmakar, S., Agarwal, H., Patil, C.D.: Designing and ergonomic evaluation of a shoe-rack in CAD environment. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 49(20), 38–41 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karmakar, S., Pal, M.S., Majumdar, D., Majumdar, D.: Application of digital human modeling and simulation for vision analysis of pilots in a jet aircraft: a case study. Work 41(Supplement 1), 3412–3418 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanson, L., Blomé, M., Dukic, T., Högberg, D.: Guide and documentation system to support digital human modeling applications. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 36(1), 17–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khayer, S.M., Patel, T., Dewangan, K.N.: Ergonomic design improvement of Pedal Thresher: an approach combining digital human modelling and response surface analysis. J. Ergon. S 6, 2 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rahayu Kamat, S., Hashim, N., Halim, I.: Othman, M. S. (2014). The rula method to reduce maximum effort level of lumbar muscle among workers in aerospace industry. Sci. Int. 26(5)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shadad Md Khayer
    • 1
  • Thaneswer Patel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bishorjit Ningthoujam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EngineeringNorth Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology (NERIST)NirjuliIndia

Personalised recommendations