Advertisement

Interface Design of Low-Cost Collision Alerting System for Sports Aviation

  • Anshuman KarmakarEmail author
  • Braj Bhushan
  • Christoph Santel
  • Ahmed Sameer
  • Bishakh Bhattacharya
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of a new traffic display compared to an existing display used for sports aviation in identifying aircraft in the outside surrounding. The study was conducted on 30 novices to test whether the visual and interactive properties of the new display is effective in detecting other aircraft. Two videos of flight simulation were generated using Microsoft Flight Simulator and presented on Tobii eye tracker. The participants had to indicate the three-dimensional position of the other aircraft based on the visual display. ANOVA was conducted with the viewing area (cockpit and sky) as within-subject variable and display (new and existing) as between subject variable. Findings suggest that the accuracy of the participants was marginally better with the new display compared to the existing one. This work can be helpful in designing low-cost devices for identifying aircraft in the outside surrounding.

Abbreviation

AOI

Area of interest

CAS

Collision alerting system

FLARM

A low-cost flight alarm system

GAFTD

General aviation flight training device

HMI

Human–machine interface

ICAO

International Civil Aviation Organization

IFR

Instrument flight rules

IVT

In-vehicle technologies

MAC

Mid-air collision

OTW

Out-of-the-window

TFD

Total fixation duration

VFR

Visual flight rules

References

  1. 1.
    Chun, M.M., Jiang, Y.: Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn. Psychol. 36, 28–71 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    FLARM Technology.: Operating Manual FLARM Collision Warning Unit: Software Version 5.00. Author, Baar, Switzerland (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horrey, W.J., Wickens, C.D., Consalus, K.P.: Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 12, 67–78 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ICAO.: Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Rules of the Air, 10th edn (Amdt. No. 44). Author, Montreal, Canada (2005a)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ICAO.: Annex 11 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Air Traffic Services: Air Traffic Control Service, Flight Information Service, Alerting Service, 13th edn (Amdt. No. 43). Author, Montreal, Canada (2005b)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    König, C.: Analyse und Anwendung eines menschzentrierten Gestaltungsprozesses zur Entwicklung von Human-Machine-Interfaces im Arbeitskontext am Beispiel Flugsicherung Doctoral dissertation, TU Darmstadt, Germany (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, C.E., Wu, Y.-Y.: Collision avoidance solution for low-altitude flights. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 225, 779–790 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santel, C.G.: Factors influencing the usability of collision alerting systems in gliding. Doctoral dissertation, TU Darmstadt, Germany (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santel, C.G., Haiduk, P.M., Fuchs, K.U., Klingauf, U.: The potential for analytical modelling and flight simulator studies of MACs to support accident investigation. EAAP 31, 395–407 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Senders, J.W.: Visual Sampling Processes. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1983)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Bowden, K., Crundall, D.: Visual search while driving: skill awareness during inspection of the scene. Transp. Res. Part F 5, 87–97 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wickens, C.D., Lee, J.D., Liu, Y., Gordon Becker, S.E.: An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wickens, C.D., Xu, X., Helleberg, J. R., Carbonari, R., Marsh, R.: The allocation of visual attention for aircraft traffic monitoring and avoidance: Baseline measures and implications for free flight (Technical Report ARL-00-2/FAA-00-2). University of Illinois, Aviation Research Lab (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anshuman Karmakar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Braj Bhushan
    • 1
  • Christoph Santel
    • 2
  • Ahmed Sameer
    • 1
  • Bishakh Bhattacharya
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia
  2. 2.BurscheidGermany

Personalised recommendations