Advertisement

Ethical Ideologies in Purchasing Attitudes Towards Counterfeit Fashion Brands

  • Indranil Saha
  • Deepak John Mathew
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)

Abstract

Fashion brands offer iconic associations with the consumers about their personalities and approaches, which are beyond their basic need of product features. Counterfeit fashion brands are similar or confusingly similar copies of authentic fashion brands and these are typically available at a fraction of the original product price with lower quality. The purpose of this study was to measure Indian consumers’ ethical and other values based on various factors affecting the consumer-purchasing attitude of counterfeit fashion brands. The study determines important predictors of attitude towards counterfeits as fashion and brand consciousness and social impact. This study also supports the fact that attitude towards counterfeit fashion brands leads to ethical judgement and ideologies and is negatively influenced by consumer’s ethical consciousness. The findings of this study may benefit fashion brand marketers, producers and practitioners in their marketing communication to design their branding strategies in the Indian context.

Keywords

Fashion purchase attitude Counterfeit Fashion consumption Ethical ideologies 

References

  1. 1.
    Chernev, A., Hamilton, R., Gal, D.: Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. J. Mark. 75, 66–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan, A.S., Shabbir, R., Majeed, S.: Ascertaining the leading antecedents of willingness to buy counterfeit luxury fashion products : an evaluation and extension. City Univ. Res. J. 153–163 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phau, I., Teah, M., Lee, A.: Targeting buyers of counterfeits of luxury brands: a study on attitudes of Singaporean consumers. J. Targeting, Meas. Anal. Mark. 17, 3–15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ingrassia, C.: Style and substance: knock-offs go suburban. Wall Str. J. 16, A7 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vida, I.: Determinants of consumer willingness to purchase non-deceptive counterfeit products and the European Union. Manag. Glob. transitions. 5, 253 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisend, M.: Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication–a generalized solution. J. Empir. Gen. Mark. Sci. 10 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubinsky, A.J., Nataraajan, R., Huang, W.-Y.: Consumers’ moral philosophies: identifying the idealist and the relativist. J. Bus. Res. 58, 1690–1701 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhatia, V.: Examining consumers’ attitude towards purchase of counterfeit fashion products. J. Indian Bus. Res. JIBR-10-2017-0177 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Penz, E., Stottinger, B.: Forget the Areal@ thingbtake the copy! An explanatory model for the volitional purchase of counterfeit products. ACR North Am. Adv. (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Callen, K.S., Ownbey, S.F.: Associations between demographics and perceptions of unethical consumer behaviour. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 27, 99–110 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGregor, S.L.T.: Conceptualizing immoral and unethical consumption using neutralization theory. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 36, 261–276 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cordell, V.V., Wongtada, N., Kieschnick Jr., R.L.: Counterfeit purchase intentions: role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. J. Bus. Res. 35, 41–53 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheung, W.-L., Prendergast, G.: Buyers’ perceptions of pirated products in China. Mark. Intell. Plan. 24, 446–462 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kwong, K.K., Yau, O.H.M., Lee, J.S.Y., Sin, L.Y.M., Alan, C.B.: The effects of attitudinal and demographic factors on intention to buy pirated CDs: the case of Chinese consumers. J. Bus. Ethics 47, 223–235 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furnham, A., Valgeirsson, H.: The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. J. Socio. Econ. 36, 677–685 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grossman, G.M., Shapiro, C.: Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Q. J. Econ. 103, 79–100 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bagozzi, R., Gurhan-Canli, Z., Priester, J.: The Social Psychology of Consumer Behaviour. McGraw-Hill Education, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Snyder, M., DeBono, K.G.: Appeals to image and claims about quality: understanding the psychology of advertising. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49, 586 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shavitt, S.: Products, personalities and situations in attitude functions: implications for consumer behavior. ACR North Am, Adv (1989)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, F., Zhang, H., Zang, H., Ouyang, M.: Purchasing pirated software: an initial examination of Chinese consumers. J. Consum. Mark. 22, 340–351 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Djuhardi, S.A., Kusumawati, A.: The influencing factors on consumer’s attitude towards counterfeit branded sneaker shoes and their impact to purchase intention (Study on Undergraduate Students of University of Brawijaya Malang). J. Adm. Bisnis. 50, 86–95 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoon Ang, S., Sim Cheng, P., Lim, E.A.C., Kuan Tambyah, S.: Spot the difference: consumer responses towards counterfeits. J. Consum. Mark. 18, 219–235 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martineau, P.: Social classes and spending behavior. J. Mark. 121–130 (1958)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mellott, D.W.: Fundamentals of consumer behavior. Pennwell Corp. (1984)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. pp. 1–65. Elsevier (1992)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ha, S., Lennon, S.J.: Purchase intent for fashion counterfeit products: ethical ideologies, ethical judgments, and perceived risks. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 24, 297–315 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vitell, S.J., Muncy, J.: The Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale: a modification and application. J. Bus. Ethics 62, 267–275 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dodge, H.R., Edwards, E.A., Fullerton, S.: Consumer transgressions in the marketplace: consumers’ perspectives. Psychol. Mark. 13, 821–835 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prendergast, G., Hing Chuen, L., Phau, I.: Understanding consumer demand for non-deceptive pirated brands. Mark. Intell. Plan. 20, 405–416 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Forsyth, D.R.: A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 175 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davis, M.A., Andersen, M.G., Curtis, M.B.: Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: a critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. J. Bus. Ethics 32, 35–53 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Basu, K.: India’s demographic dividend. BBC News. 25 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Glynn Mangold, W., Babakus, E.: Service quality: the front-stage versus the back-stage perspective. J. Serv. Mark. 5, 59–70 (1991)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bearden, W.O., Netemeyer, R.G., Teel, J.E.: Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J. Consum. Res. 15, 473 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fernandes, C.: Analysis of counterfeit fashion purchase behaviour in UAE. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. An Int. J. 17, 85–97 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Belk, R.W., Devinney, T., Eckhardt, G.: Consumer ethics across cultures. Consum. Mark. Cult. 8, 275–289 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of TechnologyHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations