Advertisement

Design and Development of Drop Centre Axle for 2WD Tractor

  • Sonu KumarEmail author
  • Avinash Kumar
  • P K Pranav
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 134)

Abstract

Longitudinal instability is the major factor to lead tractor accident. To prevent the accident, stability has to maintain that depends on tractor CG height. The CG can be maintained during operation by raising or lowering the front portion of the tractor. For lowering the front portion of tractor from normal position, a drop centre axle was used. This axle was designed in CATIA and finite element analysis was carried out in ANSYS. After analysis, trapezoidal frame with 10° side angle of 8 mm plate thickness was selected for its development. The maximum induced stress was 395 MPa, and its total deformation was 1.09720 mm. The axle weight was found to be 39 kg. The axle was developed and installed in the tractor that will help in lowering the front portion of tractor to 300 mm. It enhances the stability and accordingly maximum pulling capacity during operation.

Keywords

Tractor Accident Stability CATIA Structural analysis Drop centre axle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Extra Mural Fund project sponsored by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (EMF-ICAR), Pusa, New Delhi—India for providing the financial assistance to carry out the research work, Department of Agricultural Engineering, NERIST, Nirjuli, Arunachal Pradesh and to the Institute for providing the facilities.

References

  1. 1.
    Edward, A.B., Patikani, J.M., Oratile, A.K., Edward, A.A.: Hazard assessment of tractor operators engaged in food production in Botswana. Food, Agric. Environ. 1(3&4), 295–299 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh, S., Singh, R.S., Singh, S.P.: Farm power availability on Indian farms. Agric. Eng. Today 38(4), 44–52 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murphy, D.J., Beppler, D.C., Sommer, H.J.: Tractor stability indicator. Applied Ergonomics. 16(3), 187–191 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soraia, M.A., Cordeiro, C., Teixeira, H.M.: Analysis of fatal accidents with the tractors in the centre of Portugal: Ten years analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 287, 74–80 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nag, P.K., Nag, A.: Drudgery, accidents and injuries in Indian agriculture. Ind. Health 42, 149–162 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fabbri, A., Molari, G.: Static measurement of the centre of gravity height on narrow-track agricultural tractors. Biosys. Eng. 87(3), 299–304 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Springfeldt, B.: Rollover of tractors—international Experiences. Saf. Sci. 24(2), 95–110 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yisa, M.G., Terao, H., Noguchi, N., Kubota, M.: Stability criteria for tractor-implement operation on slopes. J. Terrramech. 35, 1–19 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Powers, J.R., Harris, J.R., Etherton, J.R., Ronaghi, M., Snyder, K.A., Lutz, T.J., Newbraugh, B.H.: Preventing tractor rollover fatalities: performance of the NIOSH AutoROPS. Injury Prev. 7(I), i54–58 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pana-Cryan, R., Myers, M.L.: Cost-effectiveness of roll-over protective structures. Am. J. Ind. Med. Suppl. 2, 68–71 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Day, L., Rechnitzer, G., Lough, J.: An Australian experience with tractor rollover protective structure rebate programs: process, impact and outcome evaluation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36, 861–867 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Franklin, R.C., Kerri-Lynn, S., Lyn, F.: Intervention strategies for the retro-fitment of rollover protective structures (ROPS) and fleet characteristic, farm tractors. Saf. Sci. 44, 771–783 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szakács, T.: Developing stability control Theories for agricultural transport systems. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 7(2), 25–37 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aziz, R.M.S.: Design and construction of electronic circuits in tractor equipped with slope sensor and its application on tilted area. Res. J. Fish. Hydrobiol. 10(11), 143–150 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cole, H.P., Myers, M.L., Westneat, S.C.: Chores at times of fatal or serious injuries associated with tractor overturns with and without rollover protection. Safety. 2, 18. (2016) https://doi.org/10.3390/safety2030018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pranav, P.K., Pandey, K.P.: Computer simulation of ballast management for agricultural tractors. J. Terrramech. 45, 185–192 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pranav, P.K., Pandey, K.P., Tewari, V.K.: Digital wheel slip meter for agricultural 2WD tractors. Comput. Electron. Agric. 73, 188–193 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Habarat, F.: Determination in relation to safety of operation of minimal load on the front axle of a tractor with implements attached. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 16(2), 126–140 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dey, S., Murthy. P. R. V. V. V. S. R. C., Baskar, D. P.: Structural analysis of front axle beam of a light commercial vehicle (LCV). Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 11(5), 208–213 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oyyaravelu, R., Annamalai, K., Kumar, M.S., Naiju, C.D., Michael, J.: Design and Analysis of front axle for two wheel drive tractor. Adv. Mater. Res. 488–489, 808–812 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kise, M., Zhang, Q.: Sensor-in-the-loop tractor control: Look-ahead attitude prediction and field tests. Comput. Electr. Agric. 52, 107–118 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Demsar, I., Bernik, R.: A mathematical model and numerical simulation of the static stability of a tractor. Agriculturae conspectus scientifi cus. 77, 143–150 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EngineeringNorth-Eastern Regional Institute of Science and TechnologyNirjuliIndia

Personalised recommendations