Measuring Sustainability of Development in Planned Hill Towns: A Case of New Tehri Town

  • Harsimran KaurEmail author
  • Pushplata Garg
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 134)


This paper aims to assess the sustainability of development, addressed in low-rise hill settlement. The study is done, in the context of New Tehri township in Uttarakhand that was developed to resettle the residents of settlements affected by Tehri Dam, completed in 1993 and which was awarded Prime Minister’s national award for excellence in planning and design in the hills in 2000. The findings reveal that accessibility has a direct relation to the population density and land use mix. The area with better accessibility and mixed land use proportions are performing better at sustainability level than the areas with poor access to public transport and community facilities. The study also emphasizes the need to develop an urban sustainability assessment framework/tool for hill settlements which could be useful for addressing the new development area and identifying the possible shortcomings of the developed area.


Sustainability assessment Hill towns Low-rise development New Tehri Town Spatial analysis 



The authors would like to thank the Public Works Department, Infrastructure Rehab. Division, New Tehri (Master Plan), Municipal Corporation Office (Ward Map), Baurari, and Statistical office Tehri Garhwal Uttarakhand (Population data) for providing access to maps and related information about the New Tehri Township.


  1. 1.
    Hamilton, A., Mitchell, G., Yli-Karjanmaa, S.: The BEQUEST toolkit: a decision support system for urban sustainability. Build. Res. Inf. 30(2), 109–115 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choguill, C.L.: Developing sustainable neighbourhoods. Habitat Int. 32(1), 41–48 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alshuwaikhat, H., Aina, Y.: GIS-based urban sustainability assessment: the case of Dammam city, Saudi Arabia. Local Environ. 11(2), 141–162 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alshuwaikhat, H., Abubakar, I., Aina Y.A., Adenl, Y.A.: The development of a GIS-based model for campus environmental sustainability assessment. Sustainability 9(3), 439 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stylianjdis, E., Karanikolas, N., Kaimaris, D.: A GIS for urban sustainability indicators in spatial planning. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plann. 7(1), 1–13 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar, M., Shaikh, V.: Site suitability analysis for urban development using GIS-based multicriteria evaluation technique. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 41(2), 417–424 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Degerman, E., Teitelbaum, S.: Social and cultural sustainability: criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning. AMBIO 42(2), 215–228 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tehri City Population Census 2011—Uttarakhand. Available:
  9. 9.
    Shahin, A., Mahbod, M.: Prioritization of key performance indicators. Int. J. Prod. Performance Manage. 56(3), 226–240 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duncan, D.T., Aldstadt, J., Whalen, J., Melly, S.J., Gortmaker, S.L.: Validation of Walk Score® for estimating neighborhood walkability: an analysis of four us metropolitan areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 8(11), 4160–4179 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamruzzaman, M., Washington, S., Baker, D., Brown, W.: Built environment impacts on walking for transport in Brisbane, Australia. Transportation 43(1), 53–77 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boer, R., Zheng, Y., Overton, A., Ridgeway, G.: Neighborhood design and walking trips in ten U.S. metropolitan areas. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32(4), 298–304 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and PlanningIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations