Advertisement

Breaking Down Silos: Women with Disabilities Issues, Voices, and Concerns in Family

  • Pratima Gurung
Chapter

Abstract

Girls and women with disabilities make up one of the minority groups occupying invisible and isolated status at individual, family and societal sphere in Nepal. Exercise of power by able over disable and male over female in family is well structured and institutionalized in different aspects through different cultures which give birth to inequalities and injustices in Nepali society. Furthermore, severity of disability accentuates the individual problems and become burdensome for family; on the other, the social stigma labeled by society and stereotypical perception about gender subjugates girls and women with disabilities. The subjugation of these phenomena leads to discrimination, and discrimination is synonym for most girls and women with disabilities beginning from family and private sphere. Family is a primary social institution bond of affection, safe place, emotional care, and space for bridging community activities and independence for all human being; however, such institution becomes paradoxical when girls and women with disabilities undergo violence, abuse, injustices, inequalities, lacking collective voice and support. Such discriminatory behaviors experiencing from family sphere are very complex and subtle to define, that often remains unreported and lack public discussion. Hence, the role and behavior of family is crucial for better environment for all. Breaking down traditional silos within family by girls and women with disabilities with a new narrative among family and society has to commence for making progress toward equality, development, and inclusive society for all.

Keywords

Girls/women with disabilities Discrimination Private sphere and family members 

References

  1. Abu Habib, L. (1997). Gender and Disability: Women Experiences in the Middle East. London: Oxfam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwis, R. (2009). Mining the Intersections: Advancing the Rights of Women and Children with Disabilities Within an Interrelated Web of Human Rights. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association, 18, 293. Google Scholar
  3. Bond, J. E. (2003). International Intersectionality: Theoretical and Pragmatic Exploration of Women’s International Human Rights Violations. Washington & Lee Public Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Emory Law Journal, 52, 71. Google Scholar
  4. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2011). National Population and Housing Census, Volume 2. Kathmandu, Nepal: National Planning Commission Secretariat, Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
  5. Charlesworth, H. (1998). The Public/Private Distinction and the Right to Development in International Law. Australian Year Book of International Law 9; 190.Google Scholar
  6. Cooker, M. (1999, September 17). Discriminatory Language, Talking Disability and the Quiet Revolution in Language Change. Presented at Annual Conference of the British Association for applied Linguistic, University of Edinburg.Google Scholar
  7. Committee on CRPD. (2018). Concluding Observation in Relation to the Initial Report of Nepal. CRPD/C/NPL/CO/1 found at website http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolnoCRPD%2fC%2fNPL%2fCO%2f1&Lang=en.
  8. Crow, L. (2003, January 15). Invisible and Centre Stage: A Disabled Woman’s Perspective on Maternity Services. Paper Presented to the Department of Health Open Forum Event of the Children’s National Service Framework (Maternity Module).Google Scholar
  9. DFID/World Bank: Unequal Citizens. (2006). Gender, Caste and Ethnic Exclusion in Nepal. Summary Report. Kathmandu, Nepal: DFID/World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Dion, K. L., & Earn, B. M. (1975). The Phenomenology of Being a Target of Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 944–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Discrimination Generated by the Intersections of Gender and Disabilities. (2013). Directorate General for External Policies: Policy Department Citizens Rights and Constitutional Department European Parliament.Google Scholar
  12. Dhungana, B. M. (2018, March 9). Access to Justice to Women with Disabilities. Paper Presented at Interaction Program on Access to Justice to Women with Disabilities, NDWA, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
  13. Eide, A. H., Neupane, S., & Hem, K. G. (2016). The National Survey on Living Condition Among Individuals with Disabilities in Nepal. SINTEF A27656, Technology and Society, Departmet of Health Research, 37.Google Scholar
  14. Fine, M., & Asch, A. (Eds.). (1998). Women with Disabilities: Essay in Psychology, Culture and Politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Franklin, A. P. (1972). Impact of Disability on Family Structure Security. https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v40n5/v40n5p3.pdf.
  16. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.). (1986). Prejudice, Discourse and Racism. London, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ghai, A. (2003). (Dis)Embodied Form Issues of Disabled Women. New Delhi: HarAnand Publication.Google Scholar
  18. Ghimire, J. (2010). Jeewan Kaanda ki Phool (Life, Whether a Thorn or a Flower). Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepali Literature Forum.Google Scholar
  19. Gurung, P. (2013a. July 15–17). Giving Voice to Voiceless: Familial Discrimination Against Women with Disabilities. Paper Presented in an International Conference on Women Studies, International Centre for Research and Development, Colombo, Srilanka.Google Scholar
  20. Gurung, P. (2013b). A Study on Familial Discrimination Against Women with Disabilidoubtties and Their Response. Social Inclusion Research Fund, SNV, Nepal.Google Scholar
  21. Gurung, P. (2015). Discrimination and Exclusion of Women with Disabilities in Nepal. Disabilities Studies Journal, DRCN, 1(1), 75–91. Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
  22. Gurung, P. (2016). Implementation Status of Disability Related Plan and Policies in Nepal, Compendium of Policies Review Report: A Summary. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission.Google Scholar
  23. Hans, A., & Patri, A. (Eds.). (2006). Women, Disability and Identity. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Johnstone, R. L. (2006). Feminist Influences on United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies, 28, 148–185. Google Scholar
  25. Kamal, L. (2011, September 7). Are You Need Is Law. The Kathmandu Post. http://www.ekantipur.com/the-kathmandu-post/2011/09/06/oped/all-you-need-is-law/225999.html.
  26. Kishor, S. (2005). The Heavy Burden of a Silent Courge: Domestic Violence. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 17(2), 77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maharjan, M. R. (2015). Studies on Disability in Nepal: An Overview. Disabilities Studies Journal, DRCN, 1(1). Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
  28. Malacredia, C. (2009). Performing Motherhood in a Disablist World: Dilemmas of Motherhood, Femininity and Disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, J. (1992), cited in Thomas, C. (1997). The Baby and the Bath Water: Disabled Women and Motherhood in Social Context. Sociology of Health & Illness, 19(5), 622–643.Google Scholar
  30. National Disabled Women Association. (2008). Social Inclusion, Livelihood and Violence Against Women, Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Action Aid Nepal and Tribhuwan University.Google Scholar
  31. Neville-Jan, A. (2004). Selling Your Soul to the Devil: An Autoethnography of Pain, Pleasure and the Quest for a Child. Disability & Society, 19(2), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. New Era, UNICEF, & National Planning Commission. (2001). A Situation on Analysis of Disability in Nepal. HMG/Nepal, 114–133.Google Scholar
  33. New South Wales Department for Women. (1996). Heroines of Fortitude: The Experiences of Women in a Court as Victims of Sexual Assault. Wooloomooloo: New South Wales Department for Women.Google Scholar
  34. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. (2014). Mainstreaming Disability in the New Development Paradigm: Evaluation of Norwegian Support to Promote the Rights of Persons with Disabilities—Nepal Country Study. Norway: NORAD.Google Scholar
  35. Nosek, M., et al. (1997). Abuse of Women with Disabilities: Policy Implications. Journal of Disability Political Studies, 8, 157–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Panthi, M. R. (2004). The Disability Situation in Nepal. Alliance for Equality of Blind Canadains. http://www.blindcanadians.ca/publications/cbm/22/disability-situation-nepal.
  37. Prilleltensky, O. (2003). A Ramp to Motherhood: The Experiences of Mothers with Physical Disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 21(1), 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Puri, M., Misra, G., & Hawkes, S. (2015). Hidden Voices: Prevalence and Risk Factors for Violence Against Women with Disabilities in Nepal. BMC Public Health, 15, 261.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1610-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a Status Characteristic. Journal of Sociology Issues, 60(4), 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rolls, C., & Chamberlain, M. (2004). From East to West: Nepalese Women’s Experiences. International Nursing Review, 5(1), 176–184. Hämtad fråndatabasen CINAHL.Google Scholar
  41. Salthouse, S., & Frohmader, C. (2004, September 15–17). ‘Double the Odds’—Domestic Violence and Women with Disabilities. Paper Presented in Home Truths’ Conference, Sheraton Towers, Southgate, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  42. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (3rd ed.). New York and London: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  44. Shadow Report. (2011). On the Fourth and Fifth Periodic Report of the Government of Nepal on CEDAW. FWLD.Google Scholar
  45. Shanmugasundaram, S., O’Connor, M., & Sellick, K. (2010). Culturally Competent Care at the End of Life: A Hindu Perspective. End of Life Care Journal, 4(1), 26–30.Google Scholar
  46. Steward, W. F. R. (1979). The Sexual Side of Handicapped. Cambridge, MA: Woodhead Faulkner.Google Scholar
  47. Sullivan, D. (1995). The Public/Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law. In J. Peters & A. Wolper (Eds.), Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives (pp. 126–134). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Thiara, R. K., Hague, G., & Mullender, A. (2011). Losing Out on Both Counts: Disabled Women and Domestic Violence. Disability & Society, 26(6), 757–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas, C. (1999). Female Forms. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Thomas, C., & Curtis, P. (1997). Having a Baby: Some Disabled Women’s Reproductive Experiences. Midwifery, 13, 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wendell, S. (1997). Towards a Feminist Theory of Disability. In I. L. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. World Health Organization and the World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  53. Woman with Disabilities Australia (WWDA). (1998–1999). Annual Report. Available at www.wwwda.org.au/annrep99.htm.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pratima Gurung
    • 1
  1. 1.PadmaKanya College, Tribhuvan UniversityKirtipurNepal

Personalised recommendations