Low Income, Inferior Education

Twenty-First-Century Political Science and Inequality of Political Resources
  • Rainer EisfeldEmail author


As if palpable tendencies toward mendocracy in the United States and the United Kingdom were not enough, a World Bank inequality specialist attested to the former country that it was sliding from democracy toward “plutocracy”, for it “empower[s] the rich politically to a much greater extent than the middle class or the poor” (Milanovic 2016: 194, 199). Nota bene, this was written before Donald Trump’s cabinet assumed office.


  1. APSA [American Political Science Association] (2004): American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality. Report of the Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy., accessed August 7, 2017.
  2. APSA [American Political Science Association] (2011): Political Science in the 21st Century. Report of the Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century. Washington DC: APSA,, accessed Sept. 14, 2016.
  3. Atkinson, Anthony B. (2015): Inequality. What Can Be Done? Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bartels, Larry M. (2008): Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bartels, Larry M. et al. (2004): Inequality and American Governance. Memorandum, APSA Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy., accessed August 7, 2017.
  6. Beddoes, Zanny Minton (2012): “For Richer, For Poorer”. Special Report, The Economist, October 13., accessed June 16, 2017.
  7. Berry, Jeffrey M./Wilcox, Clyde (5rev2009 [11984]): The Interest Group Society. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  8. Buhmann, Brigitte et al. (1988): “Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database.” Income and Wealth, Vol. 34, 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conference Board of Canada (2017): “Income Inequality – Canada and World Results”., accessed May 31, 2017.
  10. Dahl, Robert A. (1961): Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, Robert A. (1967): Pluralist Democracy in the United States. Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  12. Dahl, Robert A. (1982): Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dahl, Robert A. (2006): On Political Equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Egerton, John (1974): The Americanization of Dixie. The Southernization of America. New York: Harper’s Magazine Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eichler, Alexander/McAuliff, Michael (2011): “Income Inequality Reaches Gilded Age Levels, Congressional Report Finds”. Huffington Post, December 26., accessed June 16, 2017.
  16. Eisfeld, Rainer (2011): “How Political Science Might Regain Relevance and Obtain an Audience: A Manifesto for the 21st Century”. European Political Science, Vol. 10, 220–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elsässer, Lea/Hense, Svenja/Schäfer, Arnim (2016): Systematisch verzerrte Entscheidungen? Die Responsivität der deutschen Politik von 1998 bis 2015. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.Google Scholar
  18. Galbraith, John Kenneth (1996): The Good Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  19. German Federal Government (2017): Life Situations in Germany. 5th Report on Poverty and Wealth. Executive Summary., accessed November 30, 2017.
  20. Gilens, Martin/Page, Benjamin I. (2014): „Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens”. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 12, 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenspan, Alan (2003): “The Reagan Legacy.” Speech Given April 9, 2003 at the Ronald Reagan Library., accessed July 10, 2017.
  22. Hacker, Jacob et al. (2004): Inequality and Public Policy. Memorandum, APSA Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy., accessed August 7, 2017.
  23. Hello, Evelyn/Scheepers, Peer/Gijsberts, Mérove (2002): “Education and Ethnic Prejudice in Europe: Explanations for Cross-National Variances in the Educational Effect on Ethnic Prejudice.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 46, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. High Pay Commission (2011a): More for Less., accessed May 31, 2017.
  25. High Pay Commission (2011b): Cheques With Balances: Why Tackling High Pay is in the National Interest., accessed May 31, 2017.
  26. Hochschild, Jennifer L. (2009): Review of Unequal Democracy by Larry M. Bartels. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofstadter, Richard (1966): Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  28. Hudley, Cynthia (2013): “Education and Urban Schools.” American Psychological Association, SES (Socioeconomic Status) Indicator, May., accessed June 19, 2017.
  29. Isaac, Jeffrey C. (2014): “Rethinking American Democracy?”, Editorial. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 12, 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalmijn, Matthijs/Kraaykamp, Gerbert (2007): “Social Stratification and Attitudes: A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Class and Education in Europe”. British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 58, 547–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klein, Joel (2011): “The Failure of American Schools”. The Atlantic, June 2011,, accessed June 19, 2017.
  32. Krugman, Paul (2007): “Gilded Once More.” New York Times, April 27., accessed May 31, 2017.
  33. Krugman, Paul (2009): The Conscience of a Liberal. New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Krugman, Paul (2011): “Oligarchy, American Style”. New York Times, Nov. 4, 2011, A 31., accessed May 19, 2017.
  35. Leighley, Jan E./Nagler, Jonathan (2007): “Unions, Voter Turnout, and Class Bias in the U. S. Electorate, 1964–2004”. Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, 430–441.Google Scholar
  36. Lindblom, Charles E. (1977): Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Mickey, Robert/Levitsky, Steven/Way, Lucan Ahmad (2017): “Is America Still Safe for Democracy?” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 96 No. 3, 20–29.Google Scholar
  38. Milanovic, Branko (2016): Global Inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Phillips, Kevin (2002): Wealth and Democracy. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  40. Piketty, Thomas (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Piketty, Thomas (2017): “Inequality in France”. Le Blog de Thomas Piketty, April 18., accessed May 31, 2017.
  42. Piketty, Thomas/Saez, Emmanuel (2013): “Top Incomes and the Great Recession: Recent Evolutions and Policy Implications”. IMF Economic Review, Vol. 61, 456–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pressman, Steven (2016): Understanding Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Putnam, Robert D. (22016): Our Kids. The American Dream in Crisis. New York/London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  45. Putnam, Robert D./Campbell, David E. (2010): American Grace. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  46. Reardon, Sean/Waldfogel, Jane (2016): “International Inequalities: Learning from International Comparisons.” Sutton Trust Research Brief # 16 (December)., accessed August 23, 2017.
  47. Ryan, Camille L./Bauman, Kurt (2016): “Educational Attainment in the United States: 2015”. U. S. Census Bureau: Current Population Reports., accessed August 23, 2017.
  48. Schneider, Barbara/Martinez, Sylvia/Owens, Ann (2006): “Barriers to Educational Opportunities for Hispanics in the United States”. In: Marta Tienda/Faith Mitchell (eds.): Hispanics and the Future of America. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 179–227.Google Scholar
  49. Shaw, Daron (2008): Review of Unequal Democracy by Larry M. Bartels. The Forum, Vol. 6, Issue 3, Article 10., accessed June 19, 2017.
  50. Shibley, Mark A. (1991): “The Southernization of American Religion: Testing a Hypothesis”. Sociological Analysis, Vol. 52, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skocpol, Theda (2004): Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press/Arthur H. Clark.Google Scholar
  52. Solt, Frederick (2008): “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement”. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 52, 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2011): “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%.” Vanity Fair, March 31, 2011., accessed May 19, 2017.
  54. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2012): The Price of Inequality. New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  55. Verba, Sidney/Schlozman, Kay Lehman et al. (1993): “Race, Ethnicity and Political Resources: Participation in the United States”. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 23, 453–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Western, Bruce/Rosenfeld, Jake (2011): “Unions, Norms, and the Rise in U. S. Wage Inequality”. American Sociological Review, Vol. 76, 513–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wuthnow, Robert (2004): “Bridging the Privileged and the Marginalized?”. In: Robert D. Putnam (ed.): Democracies in Flux. The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 59–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich 1Osnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations