Advertisement

What Is the Current Human Condition?

  • Rainer EisfeldEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In her early (1958) work on the domains of man’s activities, famously entitled The Human Condition, Hannah Arendt focused on three modes of active (as contrasted with contemplative) human life: Labor, which she defined as necessary for biological survival; work, which Arendt saw as needed to create man’s collective artificial environment; and, most important to her, action—action proper, equal to human freedom and exercised as associated activity in the political, that is, the public, sphere:Such—in the highest sense—human activity is, of course, most fundamentally endangered when, as Arendt had earlier analyzed in her Origins of Totalitarianism, ideologically stipulated inhuman “laws” of Nature or History are executed on mankind by total regimes, whose terror forces the subjects together by a “band of iron”, eradicating their capacity to act freely. Unrealistically, however, in Arendt’s understanding that capacity is already corrupted when economic or social questions—issues relating to the spheres of work and labor, in other words—intrude into “authentic” politics.

References

  1. APSA [American Political Science Association] (2011): Political Science in the 21st Century. Report of the Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century. Washington DC: APSA, www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/TaskForceReports/TF_21stCentury_AllPgs_webres90.pdf, accessed Sept. 14, 2016.
  2. Arendt, Hannah (1958): The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, Hannah (1963): On Revolution. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury, Ray (1962): “Cry the Cosmos”. LIFE International, September 14, 52–62.Google Scholar
  5. Flinders, Matthew (2013): “The Tyranny of Relevance and the Art of Translation”. Political Studies Review, Vol. 11, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ostrom, Vincent (1997): The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerabilities of Democracies. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Robock, Alan (2010): “Nuclear Winter”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 1, May/June, 418–427, Wiley Online Library, climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/WiresClimateChangeNW.pdf, accessed Oct. 12, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Sagan, Carl (1973): The Cosmic Connection. An Extraterrestrial Perspective. Produced by Jerome Agel. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  9. Sagan, Carl (1974): Broca’s Brain. Reflections on the Romance of Science. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Sagan, Carl (1983/1984): “Nuclear War and Climatic Catastrophe: Some Policy Implications”. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 62, 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sagan, Carl (1994): “A Pale Blue Dot”. www.bigskyastroclub.org/pale_blue_dot.html, accessed Oct. 12, 2016.
  12. Sagan, Carl (1997): Billions and Billions, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. TTAPS [Turco, R. P./Toon, O. B./Ackerman, T. P./Pollack, J. B./Sagan, Carl] (1983): “Nuclear Winter: Global Consequences of Multiple Nuclear Explosions”. Science, Vol. 2222 No. 4630 (23. December), 1283–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich 1Osnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations