Twenty-First-Century Political Science: Politicization of a Discipline?

A Normative Science of Democracy with Empirical Rigor
  • Rainer EisfeldEmail author


American Political Science Association (APSA) presidential addresses were once christened “barometers of yearning and hope” by SUNY political scientist John Gunnell (1993: 268). He might as well have referred to them as benchmarks of critique and appeal.


  1. Ágh, Attila (41998 [11995]: “The Emergence of the ‘Science of Democracy’ and the Impact on the Democratic Transition in Hungary.” In: David Easton/John G. Gunnell/Michael B. Stein (eds.): Regime and Discipline. Democracy and the Development of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 197–215.Google Scholar
  2. Ágh, Attila (2016):“The Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe. Hungary as the Worst-Case Scenario.” Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 63, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arató, Krisztina/Tóth, Csaba (2010): “Political Science in Hungary: A Discipline in the Making.” In: Eisfeld/Pal (eds.), Political Science in Central-East Europe, op. cit., 149–162.Google Scholar
  4. Beyme, Klaus von (1986): “Die deutsche Politikwissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich.” In: id. (ed.): Politikwissenschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Entwicklungsprobleme einer Disziplin. PVS-Sonderheft 1. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coakley, John/Trent, John (2000): History of the International Political Science Association 1949–1999. Dublin: IPSA.Google Scholar
  6. Dahl, Robert A./Lindblom, Charles E. (1976): “Preface.” In: Politics, Economics and Welfare (Reissue; 11953). Chicago: Chicago University Press, XXI–XLIV.Google Scholar
  7. Easton, David (1969): “The New Revolution in Political Science.” APSR, Vol. LXIII, 1051–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisfeld, Rainer/Pal, Leslie A. (2010): “Political Science in Central-East Europe and the Impact of Politics: Factors of Diversity – Forces of Convergence”. In: id. (eds.): Political Science in Central-East Europe: Diversity and Convergence. Opladen/Farmington Hills, 9–35.Google Scholar
  9. European Parliament, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (2018): Doc. 2017/2131(INL) [Sargentini Report]., accessed April 16, 2018.
  10. Günther, Klaus (1986): “Politikwissenschaft in der Bundesrepublik und die jüngste deutsche Geschichte.” In: Beyme (ed.): Politikwissenschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, op. cit., 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunnell, John (1993): The Descent of Political Theory. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hirschman, Albert O. (22002 [11982]): Shifting Involvements. Private Interest and Public Action. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hirschman, Albert O. (1992): “Introduction.” In: Varian Fry: Assignment Rescue. An Autobiography. New York: Scholastic Inc. (publ. in conjunction with the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum), V–VIII.Google Scholar
  14. Hooker, Juliet/Tillery, Alvin B. (2016): The Double Bind: The Politics of Racial and Class Inequalities in the Americas. Report of the APSA Task Force on Racial and Social Class Inequalities in the Americas, Executive Summary. Washington: American Political Science Association., accessed August 12, 2018.
  15. Hungarian Spectrum (2015): “Orbán System or Orbán Regime. Debate on the Nature of the Hungarian Government”, November 24., accessed April 18, 2018.
  16. Katznelson, Ira (2007): “APSA Presidential Address: At the Court of Chaos: Political Science in an Age of Perpetual Fear”. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 5, 3–15.Google Scholar
  17. Körösényi, András (2005): “Political Representation in Leader Democracy.” Government and Opposition, Vol. 40, 358–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laski, Harold (1930): “Foundations, Universities and Research” [Harper’s Monthly, August, 295–303], in: id.: The Dangers of Obedience and Other Essays. New York/London: Harper & Brothers, 150–177.Google Scholar
  19. Levitsky, Steven/Way, Lucan A. (2010): Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Levitsky, Steven/Zibalt, Daniel (2018): How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  21. OECD (2014): All on Board. Making Inclusive Growth Happen., accessed May 6, 2018.
  22. Orbán, Victor (2014): Full text of Speech of Viktor Orbán at Baile Tusnad, July 26., accessed April 16, 2018.
  23. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, Limited Observation Mission Hungary – Parliamentary Elections (2018): Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions. April 8., accessed April 16, 2018.
  24. Pal, Leslie A. (2012): Frontiers of Governance. The OECD and Global Public Management Reform. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Sasinska-Klas, Teresa (2010): “Political Science in Poland: Roots, Stagnation, and Renaissance.” In: Eisfeld/Pal (eds.), Political Science in Central-East Europe, op. cit., 207–220.Google Scholar
  26. Stammer, Otto (1960): “Zehn Jahre Institut für politische Wissenschaft.” In: id. (ed.): Politische Forschung: Beiträge zum 10jährigen Bestehen des Instituts für Politische Wissenschaft. Köln/Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolfgang Abendroth Papers. Folder 535. Amsterdam: International Institute of Social History.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich 1Osnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations