Advertisement

Spatial Pattern of Development in Districts of India

  • Sanjay K. Mohanty
  • Bidyadhar Dehury
  • Udaya S. Mishra
  • Anjali Dash
  • Rajeev R. Singh
Chapter

Abstract

Though data constraints at the district level are improving over time, there are few studies that have examined the spatial pattern of development in the districts of India. Using a set of nine indicators in three dimensions of human development (health, social and economic), this chapter examines the spatial pattern of development in 640 districts of India. Two composite indices, namely, the District Development Index (DDI) and the Relative Development Index (RDI), are constructed and used to rank the districts according to the level of development. The spatial pattern of development has been assessed using Moran’s I statistics.

Results suggest that Indian districts exhibit a positively skewed pattern and high degree of clustering in development. Among 640 districts, the DDI value was lower than 0.43 in 109 districts, between 0.43 and 0.54 in 237 districts, between 0.54 and 0.64 in 185 districts, between 0.64 and 0.74 in 89 districts and more than 0.74 in 20 districts of India. Moran’s I statistics of DDI was 0.83 suggesting high and significant clustering of development in the districts of India. The variations in RDI were large across the states. The clustering in development was found to be intense in the state of Odisha followed by Maharashtra and Karnataka. We suggest that districts with lower DDI value should be accorded high priority in developmental planning within and across the states of India.

Keywords

India District Clustering Disparity Development Interdistrict Moran’s I statistics 

References

  1. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin, L. (1996). The Moran Scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. In M. Fischer, H. Scholten, & D. Unwin (Eds.), Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS (pp. 111–125). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Chaudhuri, S., & Gupta, N. (2009). Levels of living and poverty patterns: A district-wise analysis for India. Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 94–110.Google Scholar
  5. Das, S., Ghate, C., Robertson, P. E. (2013). Remoteness and unbalanced growth: Understanding divergence across Indian districts. University of Western Australia, Business School, Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Dasgupta, D., Marti, P., Mukherjee, R., Sarkar, S., & Chakrabarti, S. (2000). Growth and interstate disparities in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 2413–2422.Google Scholar
  7. Dreze, J., & Murthi, M. (2001). Fertility, education, and development: Evidence from India. Population and Development Review, 27(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghate, C. (2008). Understanding divergence in India: A political economy approach. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 11(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghosh, M. (2008). Economic reforms, growth and regional divergence in India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2(3), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guilmoto, C. Z., & Rajan, S. I. (2002). District level estimates of fertility from India’s 2001 census. Economic and Political Weekly, 7, 665–672.Google Scholar
  11. Guilmoto, C. Z., & Rajan, S. I. (2013). Fertility at the district level in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(23), 59–70.Google Scholar
  12. Kalra, R., & Thakur, S. (2015). Development patterns in India: Spatial convergence or divergence? GeoJournal, 80(1), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar, S., & Sathyanarayana, K. M. (2012). District-level estimates of fertility and implied sex ratio at birth in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 66–72.Google Scholar
  14. Kurian, N. J. (2000). Widening regional disparities in India: Some indicators. Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 538–550.Google Scholar
  15. Mohanty, S. K., & Dehury, B. (2012). Human development indices: Old and new. Artha Vijnana, 54(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohanty, S. K., & Rajbhar, M. (2014). Fertility transition and adverse child sex ratio in districts of India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 46(06), 753–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohanty, S. K., Fink, G., Chauhan, R., & Canning, D. (2016a). Distal determinants of fertility decline: Evidence from 640 Indian districts. Demographic Research, 34, 373–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohanty, S. K., Govil, D., Chauhan, R. K., Kim, R., Subramanian, S. V. (2016b). Estimates of poverty and inequality in the districts of India, 2011–2012. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 2455133316642338.Google Scholar
  19. Mukherjee, S., Chakraborty, D., Sikdar, S. (2014). Three decades of human development across Indian States: Inclusive growth or perpetual disparity? National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi; Proposed Sustainable Development Report of Indian States (2013), Housing & Urban Affairs Division, Planning Commission.Google Scholar
  20. Murgab, R., Suryanarayana, M. H., & Zaidi, S. (2003). Measuring poverty in Karnataka: The regional dimension. Economic and Political Weekly, 404–408.Google Scholar
  21. Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI). (1997). District level estimates of fertility and child mortality for 1991 and their interrelationship with other variables (Occasional paper of 1997). New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General.Google Scholar
  22. Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI). (2009). District level estimates of child mortality in India based on 2001 census data. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General.Google Scholar
  23. Planning Commission, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh. (2008). Human development report, Uttar Pradesh 2005. Lucknow: Planning Commission, Government of Uttar Pradesh.Google Scholar
  24. Rajan, R. (2013). Report of the committee for evolving a composite development index for states. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India.Google Scholar
  25. Ram, U., Jha, P., Ram, F., Kumar, K., Awasthi, S., Shet, A., & Kumar, R. (2013). Neonatal, 1–59 month, and under-5 mortality in 597 Indian districts, 2001 to 2012: Estimates from national demographic and mortality surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 1(4), e219–e226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raychaudhuri, A., & Haldar, S. K. (2009). An investigation into the inter-district disparity in West Bengal, 1991–2005. Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 258–263.Google Scholar
  27. Sen, A., & Himanshu. (2004). Poverty and inequality in India: I. Economic and Political Weekly, 39, 4247–4263.Google Scholar
  28. Suryanarayana, M. H., Agrawal, A., & Prabhu, K. S. (2011). Inequality adjusted human development index for India’s states. New Delhi: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  29. YASHADA. (2014). Maharashtra human development report 2012. New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay K. Mohanty
    • 1
  • Bidyadhar Dehury
    • 2
  • Udaya S. Mishra
    • 3
  • Anjali Dash
    • 4
  • Rajeev R. Singh
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Fertility StudiesInternational Institute for Population SciencesMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Monitoring and EvaluationIndia Health Action TrustLucknowIndia
  3. 3.Centre for Development StudiesThiruvananthapuramIndia
  4. 4.International Institute for Population SciencesMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations