Advertisement

Assessment of Machine Learning Classification Strategies for the Differentiation of Deep Brain Stimulation “On” and “Off” Status for Parkinson’s Disease Using a Smartphone as a Wearable and Wireless Inertial Sensor for Quantified Feedback

  • Robert LeMoyne
  • Timothy Mastroianni
  • Donald Whiting
  • Nestor Tomycz
Chapter
Part of the Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation book series (SSMI, volume 31)

Abstract

The considerable advantage of integrating wearable and wireless systems with machine learning for the assessment of deep brain stimulation parameter configuration status is addressed. A wearable and wireless system, such as a smartphone with its accelerometer and gyroscope, provides the quantified basis for the efficacy determination of a treatment strategy. In particular, deep brain stimulation is well suited for being amalgamated with wearable and wireless systems. For a subject with Parkinson’s disease, deep brain stimulation set to “On” and “Off” status is distinguished through an assortment of machine learning algorithms, such as J48 decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron neural network, and random forest. The feature set is consolidated from the accelerometer signal and gyroscope signal from a smartphone using software automation. The appropriateness for these machine learning algorithms was assessed in terms of both classification accuracy and computational efficiency. These capabilities further refine the opportunities of machine learning classification being allocated local to the wearable and wireless system with an available Cloud computing resource. These findings establish a preliminary perspective regarding the utility of Network Centric Therapy, for which effectively real-time optimization of parameter configurations for deep brain stimulation can be developed in a patient-specific context. Furthermore, the real-time optimization process can be adaptive to the inherent temporal fluctuations of a progressive neurodegenerative movement disorder, such as Parkinson’s disease and Essential tremor.

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation Parameter configuration optimization Wearable and wireless systems Quantified feedback Machine learning Classification accuracy J48 decision tree K-nearest neighbors Logistic regression Support vector machine Multilayer perceptron neural network Random forest Network Centric Therapy 

References

  1. 1.
    LeMoyne R, Tomycz N, Mastroianni T, McCandless C, Cozza M, Peduto D (2015) Implementation of a smartphone wireless accelerometer platform for establishing deep brain stimulation treatment efficacy of essential tremor with machine learning. In: 37th annual international conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), pp 6772–6775Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Tomycz N, Whiting D, Oh M, McCandless C, Currivan C, Peduto D (2017) Implementation of a multilayer perceptron neural network for classifying deep brain stimulation in ‘On’ and ‘Off’ modes through a smartphone representing a wearable and wireless sensor application. In: 47th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting (featured in Hot Topics; top 1% of abstracts)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, McCandless C, Currivan C, Whiting D, Tomycz N (2018) Implementation of a smartphone as a wearable and wireless accelerometer and gyroscope platform for ascertaining deep brain stimulation treatment efficacy of Parkinson’s disease through machine learning classification. Adv Park Dis 7(2):19–30Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    LeMoyne R, Coroian C, Cozza M, Opalinski P, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W (2009) The merits of artificial proprioception, with applications in biofeedback gait rehabilitation concepts and movement disorder characterization. In: Biomedical engineering. InTech, Vienna, pp 165–198Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2017) Smartphone and portable media device: a novel pathway toward the diagnostic characterization of human movement. In: Smartphones from an applied research perspective. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2017) Wearable and wireless gait analysis platforms: smartphones and portable media devices. In: Wireless MEMS networks and applications. Elsevier, New York, pp 129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2016) Telemedicine perspectives for wearable and wireless applications serving the domain of neurorehabilitation and movement disorder treatment. In: Telemedicine, SMGroup, Dover, Delaware, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2015) Use of smartphones and portable media devices for quantifying human movement characteristics of gait, tendon reflex response, and Parkinson’s disease hand tremor. In: Mobile health technologies, methods and protocols. Springer, New York, pp 335–358Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    LeMoyne R, Kerr W, Mastroianni T, Hessel A (2014) Implementation of machine learning for classifying hemiplegic gait disparity through use of a force plate. In: 13th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), IEEE, pp 379–382Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA (2011) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Isaias IU, Tagliati M (2008) Deep brain stimulation programming for movement disorders. In: Deep brain stimulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Springer, New York, pp 361–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Volkmann J, Moro E, Pahwa R (2006) Basic algorithms for the programming of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 21(S14):S284–S289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amon A, Alesch F (2017) Systems for deep brain stimulation: review of technical features. J Neural Transm 124(9):1083–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Cozza M, Coroian C, Grundfest W (2010) Implementation of an iPhone for characterizing Parkinson’s disease tremor through a wireless accelerometer application. In: 32nd annual international conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), pp 4954–4958Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, McCandless C, Currivan C, Whiting D, Tomycz N (2018) Implementation of a smartphone as a wearable and wireless inertial sensor platform for determining efficacy of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease tremor through machine learning. In: 48th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting (Nanosymposium)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    LeMoyne R, Heerinckx F, Aranca T, De Jager R, Zesiewicz T, Saal HJ (2016) Wearable body and wireless inertial sensors for machine learning classification of gait for people with Friedreich’s ataxia. In: IEEE 13th international conference on wearable and implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), pp 147–151Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sommerville I (2011) Software engineering. Addison-Wesley, BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fagan ME (1999) Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst J 38(2/3):258–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert LeMoyne
    • 1
  • Timothy Mastroianni
    • 2
  • Donald Whiting
    • 3
  • Nestor Tomycz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Center for Bioengineering InnovationNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  2. 2.IndependentPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery Allegheny General HospitalAllegheny Health Network Neuroscience InstitutePittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations