Mechanics of the Tread Pattern

  • Yukio NakajimaEmail author


Various tread patterns have been used in tire design because tires are used on various road surfaces,


  1. 1.
    Bridgestone (ed.), Fundamentals and Application of Vehicle Tires (in Japanese) (Tokyo Denki University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.E. Okonieski et al., Simplified approach to calculating geometric stiffness properties of tread pattern elements. Tire Sci. Technol. 31(3), 132–158 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Sakai, Tire Engineering (in Japanese) (Guranpuri-Shuppan, 1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Nakajima, Simple Prediction Method of Block Stiffness (Technical report in Bridgestone Corporation, 1980)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.J. Hollister, N. Kikuchi, Homogenization theory and digital imaging: a basis for studying the mechanics and design principles of bone tissue. Biotech. Bioeng. 43(7), 586–596 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.N. Gent, P.B. Lindley, Compression of bonded rubber blocks. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 173, 111–117 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.N. Gent, E.A. Meinecke, Compression, bending, and shear of bonded rubber blocks. Polym. Eng. Sci. 10(1), 48–53 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.N. Gent, Compression of rubber blocks. Rubber Chem. Technol. 67, 549–557 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.N. Gent et al., Compression of rubber disks between frictional surfaces. Rubber Chem. Technol. 82, 1–17 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Hattori, K. Takei, On the spring constant of compressed rubber block (in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 23(7), 194–197 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O.H. Yeoh et al., Compression of bonded rubber blocks. Rubber Chem. Technol. 75, 549–561 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.M. Horton, et al., Stiffness of rubber bush mounting subjected to radial loading. Rubber Chem. Technol. 73, 253–264 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Horton et al., Stiffness of rubber bush mountings subjected to tilting deflection. Rubber Chem. Technol. 73, 619–633 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.M. Horton et al., Axial loading of bonded rubber blocks. J. Appl. Mech. 69, 836–843 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.M. Horton et al., Bending of circular-section bonded rubber blocks. Int. J. Solids Struct. 39, 5879–5893 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.L. Anderson et al., The compression of bonded rubber disks. Rubber Chem. Technol. 77, 293–302 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.H. Mott, C.M. Roland, Uniaxial deformation of rubber cylinder. Rubber Chem. Technol. 68, 739–745 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Akasaka et al., Analysis of the contact deformation of tread blocks. Tire Sci. Technol. 20(4), 230–253 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Kagami, Study on Structural Mechanics of Deformation of Radial Tire in Contact (in Japanese), Ph.D. Thesis (Chuo University, 1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.M. Kim, I.J. Park, Analysis of contact stresses on the tread rubber blocks with slip. Tire Sci. Technol. 29(4), 216–229 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    V.L. Popov, Contact Mechanics and Friction (Springer-Verlag, 2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 1987Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Schallamach, The load dependence of rubber friction. Proc. Phys. Soc. (B) 65, 657–661 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Schallamach, Friction and abrasion of rubber. Wear 1, 384–417 (1957–58)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K.L. Johnson, et al., Surface Energy and the Contact of Elastic Solids, P. R. Soc. London, Series A, Math. Phy. Sci. 324, 301–313 (1971)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.R. Archard, Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 24(8), 981–988 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.R. Archard, Elastic deformation and law of friction, P. R. Soc. London Series A, 243, 190–205, (1957)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J.A. Greenwood, J.B.P. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces, P. R. Soc. London, Series A., 295, 300–319 (1966)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    B.N.J. Persson, Sliding Friction-Physical Principles and Applications (Springer, 2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Otsuki, H. Matsukawa, Local slip at friction interface and breakdown of Amontons’ low (in Japanese). Tryboligist 58, 57–64 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y. Uchiyama, Friction and Surface (in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 65, 312 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    K.A. Grosch, The rolling resistance, wear and traction properties of tread compounds. Rubber Chem. Technol. 69, 495–567 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y. Nakajima, F. Yakahashi, Effect of contact pressure distribution of rubber block on frictional force (in Japanese), Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi, 75(1), 26–21 (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. Hara, Ultrasonic techniques for the measurement of the contact stress (in Japanese). J. Soc. Adhesion Ind. 23, 400 (1987)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K.J. Pantenaude et al., Response of elastomeric blocks during large compression strains. Rubber Chem. Technol. 78, 188–198 (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. Gall et al., On the incorporation of frictional effects in the tire/ground contact area. Tire Sci. Technol. 21(1), 2–22 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    F. Takahashi, et al., Optimization of Tire Block Surface by the Optimality Criteria, in JSAE Conference, No. 20005408 (2000)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Y. Nakajima et al., Surface shape optimization of tire pattern by optimality criteria. Tire Sci. Technol. 31(1), 2–18 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. Sakai, Measurement and visualization of the contact pressure distribution of rubber disks and tires. Tire Sci. Technol. 23, 238–255 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    K. Mitsuhashi et al., Ice friction characteristics of studless tire (in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 70, 140–146 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    K. Mitsuhashi et al., Comparison of the frictional property between studless-tires on icy road and inclined angle of sipes of small block(in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 71, 626–632 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Y. Nakajima, Application of CAE to development of studless tire (in Japanese), Proc. J. Soc. Rubber Ind. Tokyo, 2003Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. Katayama, et al., Development of three-dimensional sipe technology using PAM-CRASH. Proc. PAM-CRASH User’s Conf., Tokyo, 2000Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    S. Yamazaki, et al., Effect of number of sipes in tread block on the friction coefficient (in Japanese), JARI Research J., 21, 31 (1999)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    S. Yamazaki, Tribology of tire (in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 72, 229–235 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Y. Ishikawa, Frictional property of tire –friction coefficient and characteristics of tread compound (in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 70, 193–203 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    S. Yamazaki, Mechanism of interfacial behavior between tire and ice (in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 65, 731–737 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. Yamazaki et al., Relationship between fore-aft stiffness of tire and hill-climbing performance on snow (in Japanese). Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi 70, 608–617 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. Yamazaki et al., Effects of the number of siping edges in a tire tread block on friction property and contact with an icy road. Tire Sci. Technol. 28(1), 58–69 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    K. Hofstetter et al., Sliding behaviour of simplified tire tread patterns investigated by means of FEM. Comput. Struct. 84, 1151–1163 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    E. Seta et al., Hydroplaning analysis by FEM and FVM: effect of tire rolling and tire pattern on hydroplaning. Tire Sci. Technol. 28(3), 140–156 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Y. Kaji, Improvements in tire wear based on 3D finite element analysis, Tire Technology EXPO (2003)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    F. Liu et al., Modeling of tread block contact mechanics using linear viscoelastic theory. Tire Sci. Technol. 36(3), 211–226 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    F. Liu et al., Prediction of tread block forces for a free-rolling tyre in contact with a smooth road. Wear 269, 672–683 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bridgestone, AQ-DONUTS Technology Guide (1997)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    W.R. Graham et al., Characterisation and simulation of asphalt road surfaces. Wear 271, 734–747 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    F. Liu et al., Prediction of tread block forces for a free-rolling tyre in contact with a rough road. Wear 282–283, 1–11 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, School of Advanced EngineeringKogakuin UniversityHachiojiJapan

Personalised recommendations