Advertisement

Fuzzy Based Energy Efficient Protocol for Monitoring of Nuclear Radiation Using Wireless Sensor Network

  • Ravi YadavEmail author
  • A. K. Daniel
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 968)

Abstract

Wireless sensor network swiftly emerges as one of the most prominent technology for industrial and human security application. The paper presents hybrid routing protocol for monitoring of radiation at nuclear plant using Wireless Sensor Network technology. The proposed protocol uses hybrid clustering for deployment of sensor nodes in the given area. There are two types of heterogeneous sensor nodes deployed in different region based on energy level for efficient monitoring of radiation. The super node sense the radiation level in their region continuously and transmit the sensed data to base station using fuzzy based clustering technique along with node scheduling. The normal nodes are used for routing purpose along with super nodes. The proposed protocol yields the optimum energy consumption and improve the performance and network lifetime for monitoring the nuclear plant surrounding.

Keywords

Nuclear radiation Heterogeneous nodes Fuzzy technique Clustering 

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40, 102–114 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu, L., Wang, L., Su, S., et al.: Wireless sensor network based solution for nuclear radiation detection. IEEE Conference 2014, vol 6, 978-1-4799-4808-6 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ranjith Kumar, R., Macwin, L., Rathna, R.: Nuclear radiation detection using wireless sensor network. In: IEEE Sponsored 2nd International Conference on Innovations in Information Embedded and Communication Systems ICIIECS 2015, 2015Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yadav, R., Daniel, A.K.: Performance and analysis of MAC protocols based on application. In: International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Materials and Applied Science (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mhatre, V., Rosenberg, C.: Homogeneous vs. heterogeneous clustered sensor networks: a comparative study. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2004), June 2004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., Bestavros, A.: SEP: a stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Sensor and Actor Network Protocols and Applications (SANPA 2004) (2004) 6. Soro, S., Henizelman, W.B.: Prolonging the lifetime of wireless sensor networksGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manjeshwar, A., Agrawal, D.P.: TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: 1st International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Computing Issues in Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baghouri, M., Chakkor, S., Hajraoui, A.: Fuzzy logic approach to improving stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 53(13), July 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maurya, S., Daniel, A.K.: Hybrid routing approach for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks using fuzzy logic technique. In: Published in Proceedings of 4th IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaturvedi, P., Daniel, A.K.: An energy efficient node scheduling protocol for target coverage in wireless sensor networks. In: The 5th International Conference on Communication System and Network Technologies (CSNT-2015), pp. 138–142, April 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/csnt.2015.10
  11. 11.
    Dutta, P., et al.: Design of a wireless sensor network platform for detecting rare, random, and ephemeral events. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE Press (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ding, F., et al.: A GPS-enabled wireless sensor network for monitoring radioactive materials. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 155(1), 210–215 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, J., Zhu, X., Tang, N., et al.: Study on ZigBee network architecture and routing algorithm. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing Systems (ICSPS), vol. 2, pp. V2-389–V2-393. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nam, C.S., Han, Y.S., Shin, D.R.: Multi-hop routing-based optimization of the number of cluster-heads in wireless sensor networks. MDPI J. Sens. 11, 2875–2884 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arioua, M., el Assari, Y., Ez-zazi, I., el Oualkadi, A.: Multi-hop cluster based routing approach for wireless sensor networks. The 7th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT 2016) (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raghuvanshi, A.S., Tiwari, S., Tripathi, R., Kishor, N.: Optimal number of clusters in wireless sensor networks: an FCM approach. In: International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh, S., Chand, S., Kumar, B.: Energy efficient clustering protocol using fuzzy logic for heterogeneous WSNs. Wireless Pers. Commun. 86, 451–475 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Madan Mohan Malaviya University of TechnologyGorakhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations