Advertisement

Affecting Objects: The Minor Gesture Within a Performative, Artistic Research Enquiry

  • Sarah BennettEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Emerging from artistic research undertaken at the Museo Laboratorio della Mente (Museum of the Laboratory of the Mind), in Rome, this chapter considers the affective potential of specific museum objects, fagotti—packages containing the abandoned possessions of former patients of a closed psychiatric hospital. The author recounts the instant of her first encounter with the fagotti when affect, which is non-representational, took place followed by subsequent reflection when cognitive processes were set in motion. The methods of this artistic research enquiry required meaningful interpretations and imaginative insights and discernments in order to shift the register of the artistic research from a semi-fictive account to a credible critique of the now discredited Italian psychiatric system. The final artwork—a four-channel video installation produced through embodied enactments—is described as oscillating between, and contributing to, both non-representational and representational modes of ‘knowing’, which itself provides an affective encounter for the viewer.

References

  1. Allen, J. (2005). “Einmal ist Keinmal”: Observations on reenactment. In S. Lütticken (Ed.), Life, once more: Forms of reenactment in contemporary art. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Witte de With.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, J. (2005). Empathic vision: Affect, trauma, and contemporary art. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, C. (2017). Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making: Thinking through practice. London, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. London, UK: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. (2008). Proust and signs (R. Howard, Trans.). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Dewsbury, J. D. (2009). Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In D. DeLyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in human geography. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Grosz, E. (2012). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: The Wellek Library Lectures, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Macleod, K., & Holdridge, L. (Eds.). (2006). Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research. London, UK and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martelli, P. (2010). Introduction. In UOS & Studio Azzurro (Eds.), Museo Laboratorio Della Mente. Rome, Italy: Silvana Editoriale.Google Scholar
  11. Martelli, P. (2014, November). Unpublished introduction to Safe-Keeping (custodia) exhibition. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  12. Massumi, B. (2010). The future birth of the affective fact. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Proust, M. (2002). In search of lost time: Finding time again (I. Patterson, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Thrift, N. (2010). Understanding the material practices of glamour. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kingston University LondonKingston upon ThamesUK

Personalised recommendations