Advertisement

Attuning to the Geothermal Urban: Kinetics, Cinematics, and Digital Elementality

  • Matthew ShepherdEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In Reykjavík, geothermal energy is infused with the urban experience, resulting in distinct affective atmospheres. With unique flows, rhythms and spatio-temporalities, the geothermal urban is undeniably kinetic and, as such, may be apprehended through a kinetic-cinematic research practice. In this chapter, Shepherd outlines a methodological approach that engages digital video to attune to and apprehend the elementality of the geothermal urban. It outlines how walking, via the concept of flânerie, can combine with digital video technologies to produce valuable materials for orienting a researcher within geologic and urban phenomena.

References

  1. Adey, P. (2015). Air’s affinities: Geopolitics, chemical affect and the force of the elemental. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5, 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, C. (2015). Video methods: Social science research in motion. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin, W. (1999). The arcades project. Cambridge, MT: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bergson, H. (1988). Matter and memory. New York, NY: Zone.Google Scholar
  7. Bingham, N., & Thrift, N. (2000). Some new instructions for travellers: The geography of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres. In M. Crang & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking space (pp. 281–301). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation: The performative power of the image. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, C. (2017). Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making: Thinking through practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruno, G. (2002). Atlas of emotion: Journeys in art, architecture, and film. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Careri, F. (2002). Walkscapes: Walking as an aesthetic practice. Barcelona, Spain: Gustavo Gili.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, S., & McCormack, D. (2006). Film, geopolitics and the affective logics of intervention. Political Geography, 25, 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, N., & Yusoff, K. (2017). Geosocial formations and the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 34, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crang, M. (2003). Qualitative methods: Touchy, feely, look-see? Progress in Human Geography, 27, 494–504.Google Scholar
  15. Cullen, G. (1961). The concise townscape. Oxford, UK: The Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  16. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Edensor, T. (2000). Walking in the British countryside: Reflexivity, embodied practices and ways to escape. Body and Society, 6, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farías, I., & Bender, T. (2010). Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gabrys, J. (2012). Becoming urban: Sitework from a moss-eye view. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2922–2939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrett, B. L. (2010). Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deluze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hubbard, P. (2006). City. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Ingold, T. (2000). Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1796–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  26. Khan, G. A. (2012). Vital materiality and non-human agency: An interview with Jane Bennett. In G. Browning, R. Prokhovnik, & M. Dimova-Cookson (Eds.), Dialogues with contemporary political theorists (pp. 42–57). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koeck, R. (2013). Cine scapes: Cinematic spaces in architecture and cities. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Latham, A., & McCormack, D. (2009). Thinking with images in non-representational cities: Vignettes from Berlin. Area, 41, 252–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  31. Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lorimer, J. (2010). Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies. Cultural Geographies, 17, 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. McCormack, D. (2010). Thinking in transition: The affirmative refrain of experience/experiment. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 201–220). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  35. McCormack, D. (2015). Devices for doing atmospheric things. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 89–111). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Paterson, M. (2009). Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 766–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips, A. (2005). Cultural geographies in practice: Walking and looking. Cultural Geographies, 12, 507–513.Google Scholar
  38. Phillips, R., & Johns, J. (2012). Fieldwork for human geography. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Pinder, D. (2005). Arts of urban exploration. Cultural Geographies, 12, 383–411.Google Scholar
  40. Pinder, D. (2011). Errant paths: The poetics and politics of walking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 672–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pink, S. (2007a). Doing visual ethnography. London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pink, S. (2007b). Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22, 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pink, S. (2008). An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography, 9, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson-Ngwenya, P. (2014). Performing a more-than-human material imagination during fieldwork: Muddy boots, diarizing and putting vitalism on video. Cultural Geographies, 21, 293–299.Google Scholar
  45. Rodaway, P. (1994). Sensuous geographies: Body, sense and place. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Shields, R. (2006). Flânerie for cyborgs. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spinney, J. (2011). A chance to catch a breath: Using mobile video ethnography in cycling research. Mobilities, 6, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Starosielski, N. (2016). Thermocultures of geologic media. Cultural Politics, 12, 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stewart, K. (2011). Atmospheric attunements. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stewart, K. (2014). Road registers. Cultural Geographies, 21, 549–563.Google Scholar
  52. Stoller, P. (1997). Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thrift, N. (2004). Summoning life. In P. Cloke, P. Crang, & M. Goodwin (Eds.), Envisioning human geographies (pp. 81–103). London, UK: Arnold.Google Scholar
  54. Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Tooth, S., Viles, H., Dickinson, A., Dixon, S., Falcini, A., Griffiths, H., & Whalley, B. (2016). Visualizing geomorphology: Improving communication of data and concepts through engagement with the arts. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41, 1793–1796.Google Scholar
  56. Vannini, P. (2015). An introduction. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vannini, P., & Taggart, J. (2013). Making sense of domestic warmth: Affect, involvement, and thermoception in off-grid homes. Body & Society, 20, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vergunst, J. L., & Ingold, T. (2016). Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13, 600–609.Google Scholar
  60. Wunderlich, F. (2008). Walking and rhythmicity: Sensing urban space. Journal of Urban Design, 13, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wylie, J. (2005). A single day’s walking: Narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 234–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yi’En, C. (2013). Telling stories of the city: Walking ethnography, affective materialities, and mobile encounters. Space and Culture, 17, 211–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations