Advertisement

Application of Electrolyzed Water on Livestock

  • S. M. E. RahmanEmail author
  • H. M. Murshed
Chapter

Abstract

There are many chances of contamination while handling of livestock from farm to fork. Various sanitizing compounds and techniques have been developed to remove and destroy bacteria, viruses, and parasites from animal shed, equipment, hide or skin, surfaces in processing plants, and from animal carcasses. The application of electrolyzed water (EW) is a promising one and has several benefits over traditional cleaning systems including cost-effectiveness, ease of application, effective disinfection, on-the-spot production, and safety for human beings and the environment. It was widely used in food processing industry. In recent years, researchers start to use it in the disinfection of livestock production and achieved sound effects. Using alkaline water as the animal drinking water can promote animal health. The prospect of the EW applied in livestock production is reviewed in this chapter.

Keywords

Electrolyzed water Animal shed Slaughterhouse Processing plant Hatchery Drinking water Carcass decontamination 

References

  1. Aarnisalo K, Salo S, Miettinen H et al (2000) Bactericidal efficiencies of commercial disinfectants against Listeria monocytogenes on surfaces. J Food Saf 20(4):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abadias M, Usall J, Oliveira M et al (2008) Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water (NEW) for reducing microbial contamination on minimally-processed vegetables. Int J Food Microbiol 123(1–2):151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amass SF, Thompson B, Dimmich KM et al (2007) Impact of down time on reducing aerobic bacterial counts in cleaned and disinfected trailers. J Swine Health Prod 15:37–41Google Scholar
  4. Arya R, Bryant M, Degala HL et al (2018) Effectiveness of a low-cost household electrolyzed water generator in reducing the populations of Escherichia coli K12 on inoculated beef, chevon, and pork surfaces. J Food Process Preserv.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bach SJ, Jones S, Stanford K et al (2006) Electrolyzed oxidizing anode water as a sanitizer for use in abattoirs. J Food Protect 69(7):1616–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bialka KL, Demirci A, Knabel SJ et al (2004) Efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing water for the microbial safety and quality of eggs. Poult Sci 83:2071–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodas R, Bartolomé DJ, Tabernero MJ et al (2013) Electrolyzed water as novel technology to improve hygiene of drinking water for dairy ewes. Res Vet Sci 95:1169–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosilevac JM, Shackelford SD, Brichta DM et al (2005) Efficacy of ozonated and electrolyzed oxidative waters to decontaminate hides of cattle before slaughter. J Food Protect 68(7):1393–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bügener E, Kump AW, Casteel M et al (2014) Benefits of neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water as a drinking water additive for broiler chickens. Poult Sci 93(9):2320–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bui VN, Nguyen KV, Pham NT et al (2017) Potential of electrolyzed water for disinfection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Vet Med Sci 79(4):726–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) (2015) Foodborne outbreaks. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/outbreaks/. Assessed on 21 Sept 2018
  12. Chen HY, Zhou LY, Li FD et al (2012) The application of electrolyzed water in livestock production. China Anim Husb Vet Med 39(2):74–78Google Scholar
  13. Chuang C, Fang W, Yang S (2011) A Study of membrane-less electrolyzed water fogging-spread for airborne bacteria and fungus decontamination in hen house. Proceedings of International Conference on Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; Feb 20–21 2011; Hongkong, China; IERI, 2011Google Scholar
  14. Cui X, Shang Y, Shi Z et al (2009) Physicochemical properties and bactericidal efficiency of neutral and acidic electrolyzed water under different storage conditions. J Food Eng 91(4):582–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dee SA, Corey MM (1993) The survival of Streptococcus suis on farm and veterinary equipment. J Swine Health Prod 1:17–20Google Scholar
  16. Dee SA, Deen J (2006) Evaluation of an industry-based sanitation protocol for transport vehicles contaminated with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J Swine Health Prod 14:126–132Google Scholar
  17. Dev SR, Demirci A, Graves RE (2014) Optimization and modeling of an electrolyzed oxidizing water based clean-in-place technique for farm milking systems using a pilot-scale milking system. J Food Eng 135:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deza MA, Araujo M, Garrido MJ (2005) Inactivation of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus on stainless steel and glass surfaces by neutral electrolyzed water. Lett Appl Microbiol 40(5):341–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Deza MA, Araujo M, GarridoMJ (2007) Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water to inactivate Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus on plastic and wooden kitchen cutting boards. J Food Prot 70(1):102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doyle MP, Erickson MC (2006) Reducing the carriage of foodborne pathogens in livestock and poultry. Poul Sci 85:960–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fasenko GM, O’Dea Christopher EE, McMullen LM (2009) Spraying hatching eggs with electrolyzed oxidizing water reduces eggshell microbial load without compromising broiler production parameters. Poul Sci 88:1121–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FDA (2009) Food and Drug Administration. Report on the occurrence of foodborne illness risk factors in selected institutional foodservice, restaurant, and retail food store facility types. US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MDGoogle Scholar
  23. Fedorka-Cray PJ, Hogg A, Gray JT et al (1997) Feed and feed truck as sources of Salmonella contamination in swine. Swine Health Prod 5:189–193Google Scholar
  24. Flores DRM, Athayde DR, Silva MS et al (2017) The use of ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water as alternative technologies in the meat industry. Food Res 1(5):140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fussing V, Barfod K, Nielsen R et al (1998) Evaluation and application of ribotyping for epidemiological studies of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in Denmark. Vet Microbiol 62:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gebreyes WA, Davies PR, Turkson PK et al (2004) Salmonella enterica serovars from pigs on farms and after slaughter and validity of using bacteriologic data to define herd Salmonella status. J Food Protect 67:691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guentzel JL, Liang Lam K, Callan MA et al (2008) Reduction of bacteria on spinach, lettuce, and surfaces in food service areas using neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water. Food Microbiol 25(1):36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Handojo A, Lee J, Hipp J, Pascall MA (2009) Efficacy of electrolyzed water and an acidic formulation compared with regularly used chemical sanitizers for tableware sanitization during mechanical and manual ware-washing protocols. J Food Prot 72(6):1315–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hao X, Li B, Wang C et al (2013a) Application of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for inactivating microbes in a layer breeding house. Poult Sci 92(10):2560–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hao X, Li B, Zhang Q et al (2013b) Disinfection effectiveness of slightly acidic electrolyzed water in swine barns. J Appl Microbiol 115(3):703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hao X, Shen Z, Wang J et al (2013c) In vitro inactivation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and pseudorabies virus by slightly acidic electrolyzed water. Vet J 197(2):297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hao X, Cao W, Li B et al (2014) Slightly acidic electrolyzed water for reducing airborne microorganisms in a layer breeding house. J Air Waste Manag 64(4):494–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hernández M, Gómez-Laguna J, Luque I et al (2013) Salmonella prevalence and characterization in a free-range pig processing plant: tracking in trucks, lairage, slaughter line and quartering. Int J Food Microbiot 162:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Himmelmann HK, Jones BW, Bewley JM (2017) Effects of the addition of electrolyzed water to a footbath solution on digital dermatitis incidence. J Dairy Vet Anim Res 6(1):00168Google Scholar
  35. Hricova D, Stephan R, Zweifel C (2008) Electrolyzed water and its application in the food industry. J Food Prot 71(9):1934–1947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang YR, Hung YC, Hsu SY et al (2008) Application of electrolyzed water in the food industry. Food Control 19(4):329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huton CT, Fox LK, Hancock DD (1990) Mastitis control practices: differences between herds with high and low milk somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci 73(4):1135–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Izumi H (1999) Electrolyzed water as a disinfectant for fresh-cut vegetables. J Food Sci 64(3):536–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jassim EQ, Aqeel CH (2017) Effect of alkaline water and/or magnetic water on some physiological characteristic in broiler chicken. JEZS 5(5):1643–1647Google Scholar
  40. Jirotková D, Šoch M, Kernerová N et al (2012) Use of electrolyzed water in animal production. JMBFS 2(2):477–483Google Scholar
  41. Kalit S, Kos T, Kalit MT et al (2015) The efficacy of electrolysed oxidizing water as a disinfectant in the dairy industry. J Hyg Eng Des 12:28–32Google Scholar
  42. Kawai K, Shinozuka Y, Uchida I (2017) Control of Pseudomonas mastitis on a large dairy farm by using slightly acidic electrolyzed water. Anim Sci J 88(10):1601–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Koide S, Shitanda D, Note M et al (2011) Effects of mildly heated, slightly acidic electrolyzed water on the disinfection and physicochemical properties of sliced carrot. Food Control 22(3–4):452–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leach SA, Williams A, Davies AC et al (1999) Aerosol route enhances the contamination of intact eggs and muscle of experimentally infected laying hens by Salmonella typhimurium DT 104. FEMS Microbiol Lett 171(2):203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee J, Gupta M, Lopes J, Pascall M (2007a) Comparative efficacies of hydrogen peroxide and acidic sanitizers for microbial reduction on metal can and low density polyethylene film surfaces. J Food Sci 72:M335–M339Google Scholar
  46. Lee J, Lopes J, Pascall M (2007b) Development of a sanitizing fabric wipe for use on food contact surfaces. J Food Sci 72(9):M375–M381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewis S, McIndoe AK (2004) Cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of equipment. Anaesth Intensiv Care Med 5(11):360–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lowe J, Gauger P, Harmon K et al (2014) Role of transportation in spread of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection. Emerg Infect Dis 20:872–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V et al (1999) Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 5:607–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Monnin A, Lee J, Pascall MA (2012) Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water for sanitization of cutting boards used in the preparation of foods. J Food Engin 110(4):541–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nan S, Wang C, Li B et al (2010) Disinfection efficiency and prevention of mastitis by slightly acidic electrolyzed water in a dairy farm. CIGR XVIIth world congress, Québec City, Canada, 13–17 June 2010Google Scholar
  52. Ni L, Cao W, Zheng W et al (2014) Efficacy of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for reduction of foodborne pathogens and natural microflora on shell eggs. Food Sci Technol Res 20(1):93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ni L, Cao W, Zheng W et al (2015) Reduction of microbial contamination on the surfaces of layer houses using slightly acidic electrolyzed water. Poult Sci 94(11):2838–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ni L, Zheng W, Zhang Q et al (2016) Application of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for decontamination of stainless steel surfaces in animal transport vehicles. Prev Vet Med 133:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park H, Hung YC, Kim C (2002) Effectiveness of electrolyzed water as a sanitizer for treating different surfaces. J Food Prot 65:1276–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Patterson AR, Baker RB, Madson DM et al (2011) Disinfection protocols reduce the amount of porcine circovirus type 2 in contaminated 1:61 scale model livestock transport vehicles. J Swine Health Prod 19:156–164Google Scholar
  57. Pichardo RJ, Regalado C, Tostado EC et al (2016) Evaluation of electrolyzed water as cleaning and disinfection agent on stainless steel as a model surface in the dairy industry. Food Control 60:320–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Priyanka B, Patil RK, Dwarakanath S (2016) A review on detection methods used for foodborne pathogens. The Indian J Med Res 144(3):327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M et al (2002) Air contaminants in different European farming environments. Ann Agric Environ Med 9(1):41–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rahman SME, Park JH, Wang J et al (2012a) Stability of low concentration electrolyzed water and its sanitization potential against foodborne pathogens. J Food Eng 113:548–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rahman SME, Park J, Song KB et al (2012b) Effects of slightly acidic low concentration electrolyzed water on microbiological, physicochemical, and sensory quality of fresh chicken breast meat. J Food Sci 77(1):M35–M41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rahman SME, Wang J, Oh DH (2013) Synergistic effect of low concentration electrolyzed water and calcium lactate to ensure microbial safety, shelf life and sensory quality of fresh pork. Food Control 30(1):176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rahman SME, Khan I, Oh DH (2016) Electrolyzed water as a novel sanitizer in the food Industry: current trends and future perspectives. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 15(3):471–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rajkowski KT, Eblen S, Laubauch C (1998) Efficacy of washing and sanitizing trailers used for swine transport in reduction of Salmonella and Escherichia coli. J Food Protect 61:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rasschaert G, Piessens V, Scheldeman P et al (2013) Efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing water and lactic acid on the reduction of Campylobacter on naturally contaminated broiler carcasses during processing. Poult Sci 92:1077–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodríguez Ferri EF, Martínez S, Frandoloso R et al (2010) Comparative efficacy of several disinfectants in suspension and carrier tests against Haemophilus parasuis serovars 1 and 5. Res Vet Sci 88(3):385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmidt PL, O’Connor AM, McKean JD et al (2004) The association between cleaning and disinfection of lairage pens and the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in swine at harvest. J Food Protect 67(7):1384–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Serraino A, Veronese G, Alonso S (2010) Bactericidal activity of electrolyzed oxidizing water on food processing surfaces. Italian J Food Sci 22(2):222–228Google Scholar
  69. Shirahata S (2002) Reduced water for prevention of diseases. In: Shirahata S, Teruya K, Katakura Y (eds) Animal cell technology: basic and applied aspects. Animal cell technology: basic and applied aspects, vol 12. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sidhu MS, Langsrud S, Holck A (2001) Disinfectant and antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the food industry. Microb Drug Resist 7(1):73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sundheim G, Langsrud S, Heir E et al (1998) Bacterial resistance to disinfectants containing quaternary ammonium compounds. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 41(3–4):235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Surdu I, Vatuiu I, Jurcoane S et al (2009) The sanitation effect of electrolyzed water (neutral anolyte-ank) on pathogen agents from living space and feedstuffs used in laying hens nutrition. In: 8th international symposium of animal nutrition and biology, Balotesti, Rumania, 24–25 Sept. Disponible en: http://metaviac.siat.ro/Default_engl.aspx (01/04/2012)
  73. Veasey S, Muriana PM (2016) Evaluation of electrolytically-generated hypochlorous acid (‘electrolyzed water’) for sanitation of meat and meat-contact surfaces. Foods 5:42.  https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5020042CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang X, Puri VM, Demirci A et al (2016) Mathematical modeling and cycle time reduction of deposit removal from stainless steel pipeline during cleaning-in-place of milking system with electrolyzed oxidizing water. J Food Eng 170:144–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Watson RD (2015) Use of electrolyzed water for treatment and prevention of common livestock diseases and conditions, including PRRS. US Patent App.14/180,046, 2015, free patents online.comGoogle Scholar
  76. World Health Organization (WHO) (1984) Guidelines on disinfection in animal husbandry for prevention and control of zoonotic diseases. In: Russell AD, Yarnych VS, Koulikovskii AV (eds) Elaboration of the guidelines was coordinated by the veterinary public health unit of the World Health Organization, Geneve, WHO/VPH/84.4Google Scholar
  77. Xin H, Zheng YJ, Hajime N et al (2003) Effect of electrolyzed oxidizing water and hydrocolloid occlusive dressings on excised burn-wounds in rats. Chin J Traumatol 6(4):234–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Zang Y, Li B, Bing S et al (2015) Modeling disinfection of plastic poultry transport cages inoculated with Salmonella enteritids by slightly acidic electrolyzed water using response surface methodology. Poult Sci 94:2059–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhao Y, Aarnink AJA, Koerkamp PWGG et al (2011) Detection of airborne Campylobacter with three bioaerosol samplers for alarming bacteria transmission in broilers. Biol Eng 3(4):177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhao Y, Xin H, Zhao D et al (2014) Free chlorine loss during spraying of membrane less acidic electrolyzed water and its antimicrobial effect on airborne bacteria from poultry house. Ann Agr Env Med 21(2):249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zheng W, Li B, Cao W et al (2012) Application of neutral electrolyzed water spray for reducing dust levels in a layer breeding house. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 62(11):1329–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zheng W, Kang R, Wang H et al (2013) Airborne bacterial reduction by spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water in a laying-hen house. J Air Waste Manag 63(10):1205–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zheng W, Zhao Y, Xin H et al (2014) Airborne particulate matter and culturable bacteria reduction from spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water in an experimental aviary laying-hen housing chamber. Trans ASABE 57(1):229–236Google Scholar
  84. Zheng W, Ni L, Li B (2016) Electrolyzed water and its application in animal houses. Front Agric Sci Eng 3(3):195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceBangladesh Agricultural UniversityMymensinghBangladesh

Personalised recommendations