Advertisement

Performance Investigation of Energy Efficient HetSEP for Prolonging Lifetime in WSNs

  • Samayveer SinghEmail author
  • Pradeep Kumar SinghEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 958)

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the performance of heterogeneous stable election protocol (HetSEP) for prolonging the network lifetime. An order-5 heterogeneous energy network model is proposed in this work that can defines the order-1, order-2, order-3, order-4, and order-5 heterogeneity. We consider the SEP protocol to calculate the lifetime of the network and consequently describe its accomplishments as HetSEP-1, HetSEP-2, HetSEP-3, HetSEP-4, and HetSEP-5. The SEP protocol is HetSEP-1 in which all the sensor nodes have same amount of energy. The HetSEP-2, HetSEP-3, HetSEP-4, and HetSEP-5, contain two, three, four, and five orders of energy, respectively. The network lifetime increases as increasing the order of heterogeneity. The HetSEP-2, HetSEP-3, HetSEP-4, & HetSEP-5, prolong the lifetime of the network 100.39%, 126.12%, 186.56%, & 285.67%, in respect to the increase the energy of the network by 65.0%, 72.58%, 107.10%, & 208.40% with respect to the HetSEP-1.

Keywords

Network lifetime Heterogeneity Round Stable election protocol 

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: WSNs: a survey. Comput. Netw. 38, 393–422 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heinzelman, W.R., Kulik, J., Balakrishnan, H.: Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking MobiCom 1999, Seattle, WA (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Intanagonwiwat, C., Govindan, R., Estrin, D.: Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2000, Boston, MA, pp. 56–67 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braginsky, D., Estrin, D.: Rumor routing algorithm for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA), Atlanta, GA (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madiraju, S., Mallanda, C., Kannan, R., Durresi, A., Iyengar, S.S.: EBRP: energy band based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Department of Computer Science, Louisiana State University, 298 Coates Hall, LA 70803, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2000) (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindsey, S., Raghavendra, C.S.: PEGASIS: power efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manjeshwar, A., Agarwal, D.P.: TEEN: a protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Computing Issues in Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing, San Francisco, CA (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manjeshwar, A., Agarwal, D.P.: APTEEN: a hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, IPDPS 2002, pp. 195–202 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinzelman, W.B., et al.: An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 1(4), 660–670 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., and Bestavros, A.: SEP: a stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous WSNs. In: Second International Workshop on Sensor and Actor Network Protocols and Applications (SANPA 2004) (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, D., Aseri, T.C., Patel, R.B.: EEHC: energy efficient heterogeneous clustered scheme for WSNs. Comput. Commun. 32, 662–667 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qing, L., Zhu, Q., Wang, M.: Design of a distributed energy efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous WSNs. Comput. Commun. 29, 2230–2237 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qureshi, T.N., et al.: BEENISH: balanced energy efficient network integrated super heterogeneous protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: International Workshop on Body Area Sensor Networks (BASNet-2013) (2013). Procedia Comput. Sci. 00, 1–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chand, S., Singh, S., Kumar, B.: Heterogeneous HEED protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 77(3), 2117–2139 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh, S., Malik, A.: hetDEEC: heterogeneous DEEC protocol for prolonging lifetime in wireless sensor networks. J. Inf. Optim. Sci. 38(5), 699–720 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh, S., Malik, A., Kumar, R.: Energy efficient heterogeneous DEEC protocol for enhancing lifetime in WSNs. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 20(1), 345–353 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh, S.: Energy efficient multilevel network model for heterogeneous WSNs. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 20(1), 105–115 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh, S., Chand, S., Kumar, B.: Multilevel heterogeneous network model for wireless sensor networks. Telecommun. Syst. 64(2), 259–277 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh, S., Chand, S., Kumar, R., Malik, A., Kumar, B.: NEECP: a novel energy efficient clustering protocol for prolonging lifetime of WSNs. IET Wirel. Sens. Syst. 6(5), 151–157 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singh, S., Malik, A.: Energy efficient scheduling protocols for heterogeneous WSNs. Int. J. Forensic Comput. Sci. 11(1), 8–29 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chand, S., Singh, S., Kumar, B.: hetADEEPS: ADEEPS for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Future Gener. Commun. Netw. 6(5), 21–32 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar, H., Singh, P.K.: Node energy based approach to improve network lifetime and throughput in wireless sensor networks. J. Telecommun., Electron. Comput. Eng. 9(3), 83–88 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar, N., Singh, Y., Singh, P.K.: Reputation-based energy efficient opportunistic routing for wireless sensor networks. J. Telecommun., Electron. Comput. Eng. 9(3), 29–33 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar, H., Singh, P.K.: Analyzing data aggregation in wireless sensor network. In: Proceedings of the INDIACom-2017, 01–03 March 2017, pp. 4024–4029 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science EngineeringBennett UniversityGreater NoidaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringJaypee University of Information TechnologyWaknaghatIndia

Personalised recommendations