Performance Analysis of CBR and VBR Applications on Different Multicast Routing Protocols Over MANET

  • Dinesh Chander
  • Rajneesh Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 958)


MANET has become one of the most economical means of group communication where other means of communications are either not feasible or very expensive. Traffic pattern plays a key role in achieving the quality of service (QoS) in various applications of the MANET. In this paper, Constant Bit Rate (CBR) and Variable Bit Rate (VBR) traffic patterns with varying density of nodes are considered to observe the performance of Multicast MAODV, PUMA, and ODMRP in terms of QoS parameters such as end-to-end (E2E) delay, routing load and packet delivery ratio (PDR) to propose and design the new multicast routing protocols in future. From the analysis, it is observed that it is difficult to rank the multicast protocols on the basis of performance under CBR and VBR, but the overall performance of ODMRP multicast protocols is more optimized than PUMA and MAODV under CBR than VBR.




  1. 1.
    Patil, G.M., Kumar, A., Shaligram, A.D.: Performance analysis and comparison of MANET routing protocols in selected traffic patterns for scalable network. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. Secur. (IJCSITS) 6(3), 109–117 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chander, D., Kumar, R.: IDS enabled MAODV for secure group communication over MANET. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 14(10), 648 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharma, P., Kaul, A., Garg, M.L.: Performance evaluation of CBR and VBR applications on different routing protocols in VANETs. Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Technol. 11(1), 566 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Sharafi, A.M., Alrimi, B.A.: Throughput comparison of AOMDV and OLSR ad hoc routing protocols using VBR and CBR traffic models. In: 2013 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies (ACSAT), pp. 466–469. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chander, D., Kumar, R.: A survey of issues in supporting QoS based multicast routing protocols over MANETs. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 112(13), 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yadav, A.K., Tripathi, S.: QMRPRNS: design of QoS multicast routing protocol using reliable node selection scheme for MANETs. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 10(4), 897–909 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qabajeh, M.M., Abdalla, A.H., Khalifa, O.O., Qabajeh, L.K.: A survey on scalable multicasting in mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Pers. Commun. 80(1), 369–393 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shivahare, B.D., Wahi, C., Shivhare, S.: Comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols in mobile adhoc network using routing protocol property. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2(3), 356–359 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manoharan, R., Ilavarasan, E.: Impact of mobility on the performance of multicast routing protocols in MANET. 1005.1742 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mali, B.R., Barwar, N.C.: Effect of mobility on performance of MANET routing protocols under different traffic patterns. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 1, 978–993 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pal, A., Singh, J.P., Dutta, P., Basu, P., Basu, D.: A study on the effect of traffic patterns on routing protocols in ad-hoc network following RPGM mobility model. In: 2011 International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Computing and Networking Technologies (ICSCCN), pp. 233–237. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wahed, M., Al-Mahdi, H., Mahmoud, T.M., Shaban, H.: The effect of mobility models and traffic patterns on the performance of routing protocols in MANETs. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 101(9), 52–58 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmed, E.S., Altahir, I.K., Mohammed, A.A., Salih, A.D.: Performance analysis of traffic patterns over MANET routing protocols in zigbee personal area network. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Telecommun. 6(1), 13–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tripathi, S., Kumar, A., Patel, S.K.: Impact of mobility speed on different traffic patterns in MANET. J. Netw. Commun. Emerg. Technol. (JNCET) 6(8), 19–23 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumari, A., Gandotra, N., Gupta, S.C., Upadhyay, S.: Performance evaluation and analysis of QoS routing using OLSR and DSDV protocol in MANETs under different scenario using NS-2. J. Int. Acad. Phys. Sci. 17(4), 419–432 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singla, S., Jain, S.: Performance comparison of routing protocols of MANET in real world scenario using NS3. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 99(14), 17–23 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shrestha, R., Han, K.H., Choi, D.Y., Han, S.J.: A novel cross layer intrusion detection system in MANET. In: 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), 20 April, pp. 647–654. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Z., Liang, Y., Wang, L.: Multicast in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Li, D. (ed.) CCTA 2007. TIFIP, vol. 258, pp. 151–164. Springer, Boston, MA (2008). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sumathy, S., Yuvaraj, B., Harsha, E.S.: Analysis of multicast routing protocols: PUMA and ODMRP. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res. (IJMER) 2(6), 4613–4621 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vellore, P., Gillard, P., Venkatesan, R.: Reliability and overhead analysis of multicast BitTorrent enabled ad hoc network routing. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 23 May 2010, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kharraz, M.A., Sarbazi-Azad, H., Zomaya, A.Y.: On-demand multicast routing protocol with efficient route discovery. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 35(3), 942–950 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manoharan, R., Ilavarasan, E.: Impact of mobility on the performance of multicast routing protocols in MANET, 11 May. arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.1742 (2010)
  23. 23.
    Rangarajan, J., Baskaran, K.: Performance analysis of multicast protocols: ODMRP, PUMA and OBAMP. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Commun. 2(2), 577–581 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saghir, M., Wan, T.C., Budiarto, R.: Load balancing QoS multicast routing protocol in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Cho, K., Jacquet, P. (eds.) AINTEC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3837, pp. 83–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu, Y., Elayoubi, S.E., Altman, E., El-Azouzi, R., Yu, Y.: Flow-level QoE of video streaming in wireless networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 15(11), 2762–2780 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rani, M., Singla, R.: Impact of FTP, FTP/GENERIC and TELNET traffic pattern on the performance of routing protocols (AODV, DSR) in MANET. Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 4(5), 9939–9947 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bai, F., Helmy, A.: A survey of mobility models. Wireless Adhoc Networks. University of Southern California, USA, vol. 206, p. 147 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chopra, A., Gujral, R.: QoS enabled communication support over multicast ad hoc network: an overview. Amit Chopra Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 5(1), 01–06 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSE DepartmentM. M (Deemed to be University)AmbalaIndia

Personalised recommendations