Advertisement

The Dynamic Constitutive Model of Geomaterial

  • Yuanxue LiuEmail author
  • Yingren Zheng
Chapter
Part of the Springer Geophysics book series (SPRINGERGEOPHYS)

Abstract

Geomaterial dynamic constitutive model (or dynamic stress–strain relationship) is the foundation for understanding the dynamic behaviors of geomaterial or geomaterial structure, which is under the dynamic loads (such as earthquake loads, wave loads, traffic loads, wind loads, etc.), and also the prerequisite of dynamic and stability analysis by numerical simulation methods (such as finite element method, boundary element method).

References

  1. 1.
    Bragov AM, Lomunov AK, Sergeichev IV, Proud W, Tsembelis K, Church PA (2005) Method for determining the main mechanics properties of soft soils at high strain rates (103–105 s−1) and load amplitudes up to several gigapascals. Tech Phys Lett 31(6):530–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Proud WG, Chapman DJ, Williamson DM, Sembelis KT, Addiss J, Bragov A, Lomunov A, Cullis IG, Church PD, Gould P, Porter D, Cogar JR, Borg J (2007) The dynamic compaction of sand and related porous systems. In: Shock compression of condensed matter, pp 1403–1408Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    An JX (2010) Soil behavior under blast loading. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1993) Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. J Geotech Eng 11:1085–1121Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen GX (2007) Geotechnical earthquake engineering (4–6 Empirical estimate of soil dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio). Science Press, Beijing, pp 150–166Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perzyna P (1966) Fundamental problems in viscoplasticity. Adv Appl Mech 9:243–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tong XL (2005) Finite element simulation of soil behaviors under high strain rate loading. Masteral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simo JC, Ju JW, Pister KS, Taylor RL (1988) Assessment of cap model: consistent return algorithms and rate-dependent extension. J Eng Mech ASCE 114(2):191–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katona MG (1984) Evaluation of viscoplastic cap model. J Geotech Eng 110(8):1106–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringLogistical Engineering UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringLogistical Engineering UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations