Advertisement

Vibration Analysis of FGPM Beam

  • Pankaj SharmaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

Basically, the piezoelectric coupling coefficient is represented by the symbol \(d_{ij}\). The subscript i implies the direction of applied electric field, while j denotes the direction of induced strain. In piezoceramics, a high DC voltage is applied between a pair of electroded faces to establish the initial polarization within the piezoelectric material along the three axes.

References

  1. 1.
    Parashar SK, Wagner UV, Hagedorn P (2005) Nonlinear shear-induced flexural vibrations of piezoceramic actuators: experiments and modeling. J Sound Vib 285:989–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sun CT, Zhang XD (1995) Use of thickness-shear mode in adaptive sandwich structures. Smart Mater Struct 4:202–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjeddou A, Trindade MA, Ohayon R (1997) A unified beam finite element model for extension and shear piezoelectric actuation mechanisms. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 8:1012–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trindade MA, Benjeddou A, Ohayon R (1999) Parametric analysis of the vibration control of sandwich beams through shear-based piezoelectric actuation. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 10:377–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aldraihem OJ, Khdeir AA (2000) Smart beams with extension and thickness-shear piezoelectric actuators. Smart Mater Struct 9:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shindo Y, Narita F, Mikami M, Saito F (2006) Nonlinear dynamic bending and domain wall motion in functionally graded piezoelectric actuators under AC electric fields: simulation and experiment. JSME Int J Ser A 49(2):188–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Su Z, Jin G, Ye T (2016) Vibration analysis and transient response of a functionally graded piezoelectric curved beam with general boundary conditions. Smart Mater Struct 25(6):065003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mindlin RD, Tiersten HF (1962) Effects of couple-stresses in linear elasticity. Arch Rat Mech Anal 11(1):415–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tadi Beni Y (2016) Size-dependent electromechanical bending, buckling, and free vibration analysis of functionally graded piezoelectric nanobeams. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 27(16):2199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parashar SK, Sharma P (2016) Modal analysis of shear-induced flexural vibration of FGPM beam using generalized differential quadrature method. Compos Structures 1(139):222–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parashar SK, DasGupta A, Wagner UV, Hagedorn P (2005) Nonlinear shear vibrations of piezoceramic actuators. Int J Non-Linear Mech 40(4):429–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Q, Quek ST (2000) Flexural vibration analysis of sandwich beam coupled with piezoelectric actuator. Smart Mater Struct 9:103–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu X, Wang Q, Quek ST (2002) Analytical solution for free vibration of piezoelectric coupled moderately thick circular plates. Int J Solids Struct 39:2129–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriguez-Fortun JM, Orus J, Buil F, Castellanos JA (2010) General bond graph model for piezoelectric actuators and methodology for experimental identification. Mechatronics 20(2):303–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parashar SK, Wagner UV, Hagedorn P (2004) A modified Timoshenko beam theory for nonlinear shear-induced flexural vibrations of piezoceramic continua. Nonlinear Dyn 37:181–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sharma P, Parashar SK (2016) Exact analytical solution of shear-induced flexural vibration of functionally graded piezoelectric beam. In: AIP conference proceedings 2016 May 6, vol 1728, No. 1. AIP Publishing, New York, p 020167Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang J, Xiang HJ (2007) Thermo-electro-mechanical characteristics of functionally graded piezoelectric actuators. Smart Mater Struct 16:784–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li YS, Feng WJ, Cai ZY (2014) Bending and free vibration of functionally graded piezoelectric beam based on modified strain gradient theory. Compos Struct 115:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chi SH, Chung YL (2006) Mechanical behavior of functionally graded material plates under transverse load– Part I: Analysis. Int J Solids Struct 43(13):3657–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bert CW, Malik M (1996) Differential quadrature method in computational mechanics: a review. Appl Mech Rev 49(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang X, Gan L, Wang Y (2006) A differential quadrature analysis of vibration and buckling of an SS-C-SS-C rectangular plate loaded by linearly varying in-plane stresses. J Sound Vib 298:420–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharma P (2017) Vibration analysis of FGPM actuators excited under the shear effect. Submitted to Rajasthan Technical University Kota, ThesisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rajasthan Technical UniversityKotaIndia

Personalised recommendations