Using Netnography to Research Older Adults’ Online Communities

  • Loredana IvanEmail author


Netnography is a form of ethnographic research adapted to include the Internet’s influence on contemporary social worlds. The netnographic approach allows us to observe: (1) How participants use online resources to communicate and create social influence, (2) with whom they communicate with using online tools and on which topics, (3) what types of information they communicate about, and (4) how online tools are used in different communities to coordinate participants’ everyday lives and meet their needs. With the pervasiveness of new communication and information technologies, the number of online communities for older adults is continuously growing. In the current chapter, I employ a narrative literature review to show the way netnography has been used to investigate older people’s online communities, namely type of netnography, step-by-step procedures, and the researcher involvement in the community and related ethical concerns. Netnography was mostly used to investigate older adults’ online communities in leisure studies and to a lesser extend in the digital technology domain. Furthermore, most of the studies employed observational netnography, in which the researcher plays the role of a “lurker”, and few concerns regarding the ethical use of online data were found. To conclude, I argue for the role of netnography in understanding adoption, use, and meanings ascribed to new communication technologies in later life.


Netnography Types of netnographies Online communities Older people’s online communities Older people and ICT use 


  1. Armstrong, N., Koteyko, N., & Powell, J. (2012). ‘Oh dear, should I really be saying that on here?’ Issues of identity and authority in an online diabetes community. Health, 16(4), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bengry-Howell, A., Wiles, R., Nind, M., & Crow, G. (2011). A review of the academic impact of three methodological innovations: Netnography, child-led research and creative research methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. NCRM Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  4. Berdychevsky, L., & Nimrod, G. (2017). Sex as leisure in later life: A netnographic approach. Leisure Sciences, 39(3), 224–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berdychevsky, L., & Nimrod, G. (2015). ” Let’s Talk about Sex”: Discussions in seniors’ online communities. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(4), 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop, J. (2007). Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human–computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1881–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eurostat. (2016). Internet access and use statistics—households and individuals. Retrieved from: Scholar
  8. Forte, M. (2003). Mindscape: Ecological thinking, cyber-anthropology and virtual archaeological landscapes. BAR International Series, 1151, 95–108.Google Scholar
  9. Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genoe, M. R., Liechty, T., Marston, H. R., & Sutherland, V. (2016). Blogging into retirement: Using qualitative online research methods to understand leisure among baby boomers. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, B. N. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hearn, G. N., Tacchi, J. A., Foth, M., & Lennie, J. (2009). Action research and new media: Concepts, methods and cases. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  13. Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2015). Rethinking old age: Theorising the fourth age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The “virtual classroom”: Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36(2), 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017a). Older people and the use of ICTs to communicate with children and grandchildren. Transnational Social Review, 7(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017b). Older people, mobile communication and risks. Societies, 7(2), 7.–4698/7/2/7/htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ivan, L., Dumitriu, D. L. & Săvulescu, R. (2016). Older people in digital creation contexts: Building a participatory action research design. In Zbuchea, A. & Nicolaidis, D. (2016). Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Reginal Development. Responsible Entrepreneurship, Vision, Development and Ethics (pp. 52–64). Bucharest: Scholar
  19. Fernández-Ardèvol, M., & Ivan, L. (2015). Why age is not that important? An aging perspective on computer anxiety. In Z. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Design for aging. First International Conference (pp. 189–200). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horst, H., & Miller, D. (2012). Normativity and materiality: A view from digital anthropology. Media International Australia, 145(1), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz, S. (2001). Growing older without aging? Positive aging, anti-ageism, and anti-aging. Generations, 25(4), 27–32.Google Scholar
  22. Kozinets, R. V. (2018a, forthcoming). Netnography for management and business research. In Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A., & Grandy, G. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative business and management research methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Kozinets, R. V. (2018b, forthcoming). Netnography: Understanding networked communication society. working paper, originally for Sage Research Methods Series.Google Scholar
  24. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography redefined. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Los Angeles & London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Kozinets, R. V. (2006). Netnography 2.0. In Belk, R.W. (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in marketing (pp. 129–143). Northampton, MA: Edward Edgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of Star Trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kozinets, R. V. (1998). On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. In Alba, J. W. & Hutchinson, J. W. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 25, pp. 366–371).Google Scholar
  30. Lepa, J., & Tatnall, A. (2006). Using actor-network theory to understanding virtual community networks of older people using the internet. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu, L. (2016). Online virtual community experience of Chinese middle-aged and elderly people (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from
  32. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Negreiro, M. (2015). Bridging the digital divide in the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved from:
  34. Neves, B. B., Franz, R., Judges, R., Beermann, C., & Baecker, R. (2017). Can digital technology enhance social connectedness among older adults? A feasibility study. Journal of Applied, Gerontology, 0733464817741369.Google Scholar
  35. Neves, B. B., Waycott, J., & Malta, S. (2018). Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualising and contesting the ‘age-based digital divide’. Journal of Sociology, 1440783318766119.Google Scholar
  36. Nimrod, G. (2012). Online communities as a resource in older adults’ tourism. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1)
  37. Nimrod, G. (2010a). The fun culture in seniors’ online communities. The Gerontologist, 51(2), 226–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nimrod, G. (2010b). Seniors’ online communities: A quantitative content analysis. The Gerontologist, 50(3), 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nimrod, G. (2009). Seniors’ online communities: A quantitative content analysis. The Gerontologist, 50(3), 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Puri, A. (2009). Webnography: Its evolution and implications for market research. International Journal of Market Research, 51(2), 273–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge M.A: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Righi, V., Rosales, A., Sayago, S., & Blat, J. (2013). Older people’s strategies for building trust in online communities through an ethno-graphical lens. In T. Schulz (Ed.), Proceedings of the User-Centered Trust in Interactive Systems: NordiCHI 2012 (pp. 43–47).Google Scholar
  43. Righi, V., Sayago S., & Blat, J. (2012). Older people’s use of Social Network Sites while participating in local online communities from an ethnographical perspective. In Proceedings of CIRN 2012 Community Informatics Conference: ‘Ideals meet Reality’, Nov 7–9, Prato, Italy.Google Scholar
  44. Roberts, L. D. (2015). Ethical issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 314–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Vol. 339. Amsterdam: Vossiupers UvA.Google Scholar
  46. Sayago, S., Forbes, P., & Blat, J. (2013). Older people becoming successful ICT learners over time: Challenges and strategies through an ethnographical lens. Educational Gerontology, 39(7), 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tönnies, F. (1955). Community and association:(Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Varis, P. (2016). Digital etnography. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 55–68). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations, UN. (2017). The 2017 revision of world population prospects revised. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of Political Studies and Public AdministrationBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations