Advertisement

Critical Events and Academic Women’s Career Profiles

  • Carmel Diezmann
  • Susan Grieshaber
Chapter

Abstract

The previous chapter discussed luck, the scant research that has been undertaken about how women attribute success to luck, and the ways in which WPs talked about luck as part of their career progression and success. The focus of this chapter is critical events and women’s career profiles. Many women academics do not follow the traditional academic career pathway and progress from graduate study through the academic ranks (e.g., Bell S: Women in science in Australia: maximising productivity, diversity and innovation. Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies, Canberra. Retrieved from http://scienceandtechnologyaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/2009report_wise.pdf, 2009; Bennett C: Brussels Econ Rev 54(2/3):149–176, 2012). However, there is scant literature on nontraditional pathways that academic women might take. Hence, the purpose of this chapter is to explore the various life courses of women in the professoriate using a critical moment approach (e.g., European Commission: Meta-analysis of gender and science research: synthesis report. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/meta-analysis-of-gender-and-science-research-synthesis-report.pdf, 2016). Clark’s (Hum Relat 53(6):747–770, 2000) work/family border theory (W/F BT) is employed to provide insight into how these critical moments impact women’s career progression. She argues that women’s lives shape and are shaped by their work and family situations and the interactions between these. Of particular importance are the cultural norms of the work and family domains and their compatibility; the physical, temporal, and psychological borders between work and home domains; the ease of crossing the work-home borders on a regular basis; and the support of those who hold significant roles in the work or family domains.

References

  1. Ahmad, S. (2017). Family or future in the academy? Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 203–239.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiston, S. (2011). Equality, justice and gender: Barriers to the ethical university for women. Ethics and Education, 6(3), 279–291.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2011.632721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auriol, L., Misu, M., & Freeman, R. A. (2013). Careers of doctorate holders: Analysis of labour market and mobility indicators (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper 2013/04). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/careers-of-doctorate-holders_5k43nxgs289w-en.
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016, March 29). Retirement and retirement intentions, Australia, July 2014 to June 2015. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/6238.0Main%20Features3July%202014%20to%20June%202015?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=6238.0&issue=July%202014%20to%20June%202015&num=&view=.
  5. Australian National University. (2015, February 2). Procedure: Dual career hire application and appointments. Retrieved from https://policies.anu.edu.au/ppl/document/ANUP_000686.
  6. Bagilhole, B. (1993). Survivors in a male preserve: A study of British women academics’ experiences and perceptions of discrimination in a UK university. Higher Education, 26(4), 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagilhole, B. (2007). Challenging women in the male academy: Think about draining the swamp. In P. Cotterill, S. Jackson, & G. Letherby (Eds.), Challenges and negotiations for women in higher education (pp. 21–32). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker, M. (2009). Gender, academia and the managerial university. New Zealand Sociology, 24(1), 24–48.Google Scholar
  9. Baker, M. (2010). Career confidence and gendered expectations of academic promotion. Journal of Sociology, 46(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauder, H. (2015). The international mobility of academics: A labour market perspective. International Migration, 53(1), 83–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2012.00783.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, S. (2009). Women in science in Australia: Maximising productivity, diversity and innovation. Canberra, Australia: Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies. Retrieved from http://scienceandtechnologyaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/2009report_wise.pdf.
  12. Bennett, C. (2012). Beyond the leaky pipeline: Consolidating understanding and incorporating new research about women’s science careers in the UK. Brussels Economic Review, 54(2/3), 149–176.Google Scholar
  13. Bracken, S. J., Allen, J. K., & Dean, D. R. (Eds.). (2006). The balancing act: Gendered perspectives in faculty roles and work life. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Bronstein, P. (2001). Older women in academia: Contemporary history and issues. Journal of Women's History, 12(4), 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrington, K., & Pratt, A. (2003). How far have we come? Gender disparities in the Australian higher education system (Current Issues Brief No. 31). Canberra, Australia: Department of Parliamentary Library.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dany, F., Louvel, S., & Valette, A. (2011). Academic careers: The limits of the “boundaryless approach” and the power of promotion scripts. Human Relations, 64(7), 971–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deem, R. (2003). Gender, organizational cultures and the practices of manager-academics in UK universities. Gender, Work and Organization, 10(2), 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deutsch, F. M., & Yao, B. (2014). Gender differences in faculty attrition in the USA. Community, Work & Family, 17(4), 392–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2014.885880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doherty, L., & Manfredi, S. (2005). Improving women’s representation in senior positions in the higher education sector, stage 1 findings. Oxford, UK: Centre for Diversity Policy Research, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
  21. Doherty, L., & Manfredi, S. (2010). Improving women’s representation in senior positions in universities. Employee Relations, 32(2), 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elgqvist-Saltzman, I. (1992). Straight roads and winding tracks: Swedish educational policy from a gender equality perspective. Gender and Education, 4(1–2), 41–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025920040104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2016). Meta-analysis of gender and science research: Synthesis report. Brussels, Belgium: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/meta-analysis-of-gender-and-science-research-synthesis-report.pdf.
  24. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Klarreich, E. (2014, August 12). A tenacious explorer of abstract surfaces: Maryam Mirzakhani’s monumental work draws deep connections between topology, geometry and dynamical systems. Quanta Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.quantamagazine.org/20140812-a-tenacious-explorer-of-abstract-surfaces/.
  26. Mason, M. A., Goulden, M., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2006). Babies matter: Pushing the gender equity revolution forward. In S. J. Bracken, J. K. Allen, & D. R. Dean (Eds.), The balancing act: Gendered perspectives in faculty roles and work lives (pp. 9–29). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Morley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(1), 114–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.864611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray, N., Tremaine, M., & Fountaine, S. (2012). Breaking through the glass ceiling in the ivory tower: Using a case study to gain new understandings of old gender issues. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(2), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Overton, S. (2008). Gender equity in American higher education: Institutional studies and interventions. Yale University Women Faculty Forum Report.Google Scholar
  30. Pyke, J. (2013). Women, choice and promotion or why women are still a minority in the professoriate. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), 444–454.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.812179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryan, M., & Haslam, R. (2006). The glass cliff: The stress of working on the edge. European Business Forum, 27, 42–47.Google Scholar
  32. Sabharwal, M. (2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399–426.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spearritt, K. (1999). Deconstructing the challenges facing Australian corporate women. Mt Eliza Business Reviews, 2(2), 40–47.Google Scholar
  34. Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. New York, NY/London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Staines, G. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and non-work. Human Relations, 33(2), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sussman, D., & Yssaad, L. (2005, February). The rising profile of women academics. Perspectives, 6, 6–19.Google Scholar
  37. Tessens, L., White, K., & Web, C. (2011). Senior women in higher education institutions: Perceived development needs and support. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), 653–665.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.621191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thanacoody, P., Bartram, T., Barker, M., & Jacobs, K. (2006). Career progression among female academics: A comparative study of Australia and Mauritius. Women in Management Review, 21(7), 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thorne, S. (2013). The scholarship of intellectual generosity. Nursing Inquiry, 20(4), 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thornton, M. (2013). The mirage of merit: Reconstituting the ‘ideal academic’. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(76), 127–143.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2013.789584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. University of Queensland. (2015, September). The University of Queensland recruitment and selection manual. Retrieved from http://www.uq.edu.au/shared/resources/personnel/recruitment/RecruitmentandSelectionManual.pdf.
  42. Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Anderson, R. (2005). Social background, credential inflation and educational strategies. Acta Sociologica, 48(4), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Slaying the seven-headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(1), 71–92.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White, K. (2003). Women and leadership in higher education in Australia. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. White, K., Carvalho, T., & Riordan, S. (2011). Gender, power and managerialism in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), 179–188.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.559631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White, K., & Özkanli, O. (2011). A comparative study of perceptions of gender and leadership in Australian and Turkish universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(1), 3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.536976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White, K., Riordan, S., Özkanli, O., & Neale, J. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives of gender and management in universities. South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(4), 646–660.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmel Diezmann
    • 1
  • Susan Grieshaber
    • 2
  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia
  2. 2.La Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations