Advertisement

Description and Generalization of Continuous Areal Features

  • Haowen Yan
Chapter

Abstract

Areal features on maps are visual representation of real phenomenon in the geographic space. Areal phenomena are two dimensional in spatial extent, having both length and width and appearing on maps as polygons (Yan et al. 2008). An example of areal phenomena is a lake, assuming that only its two-dimensional surface is concerned. Political units, such as countries, provinces/states and counties, can also fit this framework if they are represented on large or intermediate scale maps, because each of them is symbolized as an enclosed region. However, an insight into the differences between lakes and political regions on maps may gains that their distribution modes are different: lakes are shown as discrete polygons, while political regions are usually visualized using continuous polygons (Fig. 6.1).

References

  1. Adams B., McKenzie G., 2013, Inferring thematic places from spatially referenced natural language descriptions. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge, pp. 201–221, Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal P., 2005, Ontological considerations in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19: 501–536.Google Scholar
  3. Ahlqvist O., Varanka D., Fritz S., Janowicz K., 2017, Land Use and Land Cover Semantics: Principles, Best Practices, and Prospects, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ai T., Liu Y., 2002, Aggregation and Fusion in Land-use data generalization, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 27(5): 486–492Google Scholar
  5. Alameh N., 2003, Chaining geographic information web services. Ieee Internet Computing, 7: 22–29.Google Scholar
  6. Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., Davis A.P., Dolinski K., Dwight S.S., Eppig J.T., 2000, Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature genetics, 25: 25–29.Google Scholar
  7. Bader M, Weibel R.1997. Detecting and Resolving Size and Proximity Conflicts in the Generalization of Polygonal Maps, the Proceedings of the 18th International Cartographic Conference, Stockholm, Swiden, Vol. (3):1525–1532Google Scholar
  8. Baglioni M., Masserotti M.V., Renso C., Spinsanti L., 2007, Building geospatial ontologies from geographical databases. In International Conference on GeoSpatial Sematics, pp.195–209, Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Ballatore A., Adams B., 2015, Extracting Place Emotions from Travel Blogs. In Proceedings of AGILE, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  10. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J. and Lissila O., 2001, The Semantic Web, Scientific american 284 (5): 28–37.Google Scholar
  11. Bishr Y., 1998, Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12: 299–314.Google Scholar
  12. Bizer C., Lehmann J., Kobilarov G., Auer S., Becker C., Cyganiak R., Hellmann S., 2009, DBpedia- A crystallization point for the Web of Data. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 7: 154–165.Google Scholar
  13. Brodaric B., 2004, The design of GSC FieldLog: ontology-based software for computer aided geological field mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 30: 5–20.Google Scholar
  14. Buitelaar P., Cimiano P., Magnini B., 2005, Ontology learning from text: An overview. Ontology learning from text: Methods, evaluation and applications, 123: 3–12.Google Scholar
  15. Buscaldi D., Rosso P., 2008, Map-based vs. knowledge-based toponym disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Geographic information retrieval, pp.19–22, ACM.Google Scholar
  16. Buttenfield B.P. & McMaster, R. 1991, Map Generalization: Making Rules for Knowledge Representation, London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
  17. Couclelis H., 2009, Ontology, epistemology, teleology: triangulating geographic information science. In Research trends in geographic information science, pp.3–15, Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Couclelis H., 2010, Ontologies of geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24: 1785–1809.Google Scholar
  19. Cresswell T., 2014, Place: An Introduction: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Cruz I.F., Sunna W., Chaudhry A., 2004, Semi-automatic ontology alignment for geospatial data integration. In International Conference on Geographic Information Science, pp.51–66, Springer.Google Scholar
  21. de Berg M., van Kreveld M., Schirra S., 1998, Topologically correct subdivision simplification using the bandwidth criterion, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(4):243–257Google Scholar
  22. Di Donato P., 2010, Geospatial semantics: a critical review. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp.528–544, Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Egenhofer M.J., 2002, Toward the semantic geospatial web. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, pp. 1–4, ACM.Google Scholar
  24. Egenhofer M.J., Mark D.M., 1995, Naive geography. In International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, pp. 1–15, Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Fonseca F.T., Egenhofer M.J., Agouris P., Câmara G., 2002, Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 6:231–257.Google Scholar
  26. Frank A.U., 1997, Spatial ontology: A geographical information point of view. In Spatial and temporal reasoning, pp.135–153, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank A.U., 2001, Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15:667–678.Google Scholar
  28. Frontiera P., Larson R., Radke J., 2008, A comparison of geometric approaches to assessing spatial similarity for GIR. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22: 337–360.Google Scholar
  29. Galanda M., 2003, Automated polygon generalization in a multi agent system, Dissertation for Doctor’s Degree, University of Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  30. Gao W., Gong J., 2005, Research on knowledge-based thematic data generalization in GIS, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 30(5): 400–404Google Scholar
  31. Gao W., Gong J., Li Z., 2004,Thematic Knowledge for the Generalization of Land Use Data, Cartographic Journal, 41 (3) :245–252Google Scholar
  32. Gates A.Q., Keller G.R., Salayandia L., Da Silva P.P., Salcedo F., 2007, The gravity data ontology: Laying the foundation for workflow-driven ontologies. In International Conference on GeoSpatial Sematics, pp.278–287, Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Golledge R.G., 2002, The nature of geographic knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92: 1–14.Google Scholar
  34. Goodchild M.F., Hill L.L., 2008, Introduction to digital gazetteer research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22: 1039–1044.Google Scholar
  35. Harvey F., Kuhn W., Pundt H., Bishr Y., Riedemann C., 1999, Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information. The Annals of Regional Science, 33: 213–232.Google Scholar
  36. Heath T., Bizer C., 2011, Linked data: Evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 1: 1–136.Google Scholar
  37. Herzog A., Brassel K., Bopp M. Dorigo G., 1983, Ein System zur Generalisierung von Grenzliniendateien Administrativer Einheiten der Schweiz. Geoprocessing Series, Vol.3, Geographic Institute, University of ZurichGoogle Scholar
  38. Hess G.N., Iochpe C., Ferrara A., Castano S., 2007, Towards effective geographic ontology matching. In International Conference on GeoSpatial Sematics, pp.51–65, Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Hitzler P., Krotzsch M., Rudolph S., 2009, Foundations of semantic web technologies: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hu Y., Janowicz K., 2016, Enriching Top-down Geo-ontologies Using Bottom-up Knowledge Mined from Linked Data. Advancing Geographic Information Science: The Past and Next Twenty Years, pp.183.Google Scholar
  41. Hu Y., McKenzie G., Janowicz K., Gao S., 2015, Mining Human-Place Interaction Patterns from Location-Based Social Networks to Enrich Place Categorization Systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Engineering for Spatial Information Processes at COSIT 2015. Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  42. Hu Y.J., 2017, Geospatial Semantics. In Bo Huang, Thomas J. Cova, and Ming-Hsiang Tsou et al. (Eds): Comprehensive Geographic Information Systems, Elsevier. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Jaakkola O., 1998, Multi-scale categorical databases with automatic generalization transformations based on map algebra, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(4):195–207Google Scholar
  44. Janowicz K., 2012, Observation-driven geo-ontology engineering. Transactions in GIS, 16: 351–374.Google Scholar
  45. Janowicz K., Scheider S., Pehle T., Hart G., 2012, Geospatial semantics and linked spatiotemporal data–Past, present, and future. Semantic Web, 3: 321–332.Google Scholar
  46. Janowicz K., Scheider S., Adams B., 2013, A geo-semantics flyby. In Reasoning web. Semantic technologies for intelligent data access, pp. 230–250, Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Jansen L.J.M., Groom G., Carrai G., 2008, Land-cover harmonisation and semantic similarity: some methodological issues, Journal of Land Use Science, 3: 131–160Google Scholar
  48. Jones C.B., Purves R.S., 2008, Geographical information retrieval. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22: 219–228.Google Scholar
  49. Jones R., Zhang W.V., Rey B., Jhala P., Stipp E., 2008, Geographic intention and modification in web search. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22: 229–246.Google Scholar
  50. Kuhn W., 2005, Geospatial Semantics: Why, of What, and How? Journal on Data Semantics III, LNCS, 3534: 1–24.Google Scholar
  51. Lemmens R., Wytzisk A., d By R., Granell C., Gould M., van Oosterom P., 2006, Integrating semantic and syntactic descriptions to chain geographic services. Ieee Internet Computing, 10: 42–52.Google Scholar
  52. Liu Y L et al. 2003. Categorical Database Generalization, Geo-Spatial Information Science, 6(4), pp.1–9Google Scholar
  53. Lutz M., Sprado J., Klien E., Schubert C., Christ I., 2009, Overcoming semantic heterogeneity in spatial data infrastructures. Computers & Geosciences, 35:739–752.Google Scholar
  54. Maedche A., Staab S., 2004, Ontology learning. In Handbook on ontologies, pp.173–190, Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Mallenby D., 2007, Grounding a Geographic Ontology on Geographic Data. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, pp.101–106.Google Scholar
  56. Mark D., Egenhofer M., Hirtle S., Smith B., 2000, UCGIS emerging research theme: Ontological foundations for geographic information science.Google Scholar
  57. Muller J.C. and Wang Z, 1992, Area-Patch Generalization: A Competitive Approach, The Cartographic Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 137–144Google Scholar
  58. Neun M & Steiniger S. 2005, Modelling Cartographic Relations for Categorical Maps, XXII International Cartographic Conference, A Coruña, Spain, 2005Google Scholar
  59. Nwana H.S., 1996, Software Agents: An Overview, Knowledge Engineering Review, 21 (3): 205–244Google Scholar
  60. Peter B., 1997, Ableitung von Generalisierten Bodennutzungskarten aus der Arealstatistik der Schweiz 1979/85, Master thesis, Geographic Institute, University of ZurichGoogle Scholar
  61. Peter B., Weibel R., 1999, Using vector and raster-based techniques in categorical map generalization, in the proceedings of the third ICA Workshop on Progress in Automated Map Generalization, Ottawa, 12–14 August 1999, pp.1–14Google Scholar
  62. Piwowar J.M., Ledrew E.F. Dudycha D.J., 1990, Integration of spatial data in vector and raster formats in a geographic information system environment. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 4(4):429–444Google Scholar
  63. Pundt H., Bishr Y., 2002, Domain ontologies for data sharing–an example from environmental monitoring using field GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 28: 95–102.Google Scholar
  64. Purves R.S., Clough P., Jones C.B., Arampatzis A., Bucher B., Finch D., Fu G., Joho H., Syed A.K., Vaid S., 2007, The design and implementation of SPIRIT: a spatially aware search engine for information retrieval on the Internet. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21:717–745.Google Scholar
  65. Qian H., Wu F., 2004, A monitoring model used in automated map generalization, Journal of Surveying and Mapping Technology, 21(3): 211–214Google Scholar
  66. Ruas A.,2001, Automating the generalization of geographical data: the age of maturity, in the Proceedings 20th International Cartographic Conference, Beijing, China, 1943–1953Google Scholar
  67. Schermer B.W., 2007, Software agents, surveillance, and the right to privacy: A legislative framework for agent-enabled surveillance, 21(3): 205–244Google Scholar
  68. Schuurman N., Leszczynski A., 2006, Ontology-Based Metadata. Transactions in GIS, 10, 709–726.Google Scholar
  69. Sen S., 2007, Two types of hierarchies in geospatial ontologies. In International Conference on GeoSpatial Sematics, pp.1–19, Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Shamsfard M., Barforoush A.A., 2004, Learning ontologies from natural language texts. International journal of human-computer studies, 60, 17–63.Google Scholar
  71. Shankar M., Sorokine A., Bhaduri B., Resseguie D., Shekhar S., Yoo J.S., 2007, Spatio-temporal conceptual schema development for wide-area sensor networks. In International Conference on GeoSpatial Sematics, pp.160–176, Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Shea S. & McMaster R. B. 1989, Cartographic Generalization in A Digital Environment: When and How to Generalize, Proceedings AutoCarto 9, pp.56–67Google Scholar
  73. Shvaiko P., Euzenat J., 2005, A survey of schema-based matching approaches. In Journal on data semantics IV, pp.146–171, Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Smith B., Mark D.M., 2001, Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15: 591–612.Google Scholar
  75. Sunna W., Cruz I.F., 2007, Structure-based methods to enhance geospatial ontology alignment. In International Conference on GeoSpatial Sematics, pp.82–97, Springer.Google Scholar
  76. Visser U., Stuckenschmidt H., Schuster G., Vögele T., 2002, Ontologies for geographic information processing. Computers & Geosciences, 28: 103–117.Google Scholar
  77. Wang Y., Gong J., Wu X., 2007, Geospatial semantic interoperability based on ontology. Geo-spatial Information Science, 10: 204–207.Google Scholar
  78. Weibel R., 1996, A typology of constraints to line simplification, in the Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft, The Netherlands, Vol.1:9A.1-9A.14.Google Scholar
  79. Weibel R., Dutton G.H., 1998, Constraint-based automated map generalization, in the Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Vancouver, BC, pp. 214–244.Google Scholar
  80. Winter S., Freksa C., 2012, Approaching the notion of place by contrast. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2012: 31–50.Google Scholar
  81. Wooldridge M.J., 2002, An Introduction to Multiagent Systems, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  82. Wooldridge M., Jennings N.R., 1995, Intelligent agents: theory and practice, Knowledge Engineering Review, 10 (2): 115–152Google Scholar
  83. Yan H. Weibel R & Yang B. 2008, A multi-parameter approach to automated building grouping and generalization, Geoinformatica, 12 (1), pp.73–89Google Scholar
  84. Yan H., Yang W., Chen Q., and Liang T., 2000, Automatic construction of topological polygons, Journal of Graph and Image, 5(7): 563–567.Google Scholar
  85. Ye M., Shou D., Lee W.C., Yin P., Janowicz K., 2011, On the semantic annotation of places in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp.520–528, ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haowen Yan
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of GeomaticsLanzhou Jiaotong UniversityLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations