Advertisement

Field Gene Banks and Clonal Repositories

  • P. E. Rajasekharan
  • V. Ramanatha Rao
Chapter

Abstract

Many horticultural species are either difficult or impossible to conserve as seeds because they produce recalcitrant seeds or reproduce vegetatively. Hence, they should be conserved as live plants in Field Gene Banks (FGB). FGBs provide an opportunity for easy and ready access to conserved material for research and utilization. Plant genetic resources conservation in FGBs helps not only in their conservation but also in their characterization, evaluation and utilization. Conservation in FGBs is required because alternative conservation methods are not fully developed for many plant species. There are pros and cons in conserving a species in an FGB. The advantages are that accessions are readily available for characterization, evaluation, use and exchange. Some disadvantages are that the accessions in an FGB are exposed to vagaries of nature (flood, drought, earthquake, etc.), disease and pests. Vegetatively propagated crops are maintained in clonal repositories as well. In the absence of seed production, clones are propagated and maintained in the form of trees, roots, tubers, corms, etc., and in FGBs. Although clonal repositories need less space, are easy to manage and cost-effective, FGBs are needed for maintaining genetic diversity. During the 1980s, procedures were developed for the maintenance of germplasm collections in FGBs. Bioversity International (formerly IPGRI) proposed guidelines for FGB establishment and the FAO released gene bank standards that cover good practices, including those for FGBs. Although there are no specific research needs, there are many ways in which FGBs can be made more effective, and some of these are discussed here. This chapter is concerned with the different aspects of FGB establishment and how to conserve accession with FGB, with specific examples.

Keywords

FGB Clonal repository Conservation Characterization Evaluation and use 

References

  1. Cohen, J. I., Williams, T. J., Plucknett, D. L., & Shands, H. (1991). Ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources: Global development and environmental concerns. Science, 253, 866–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cromarty, A. S., Ellis, R. H., & Roberts, E. H. (1990). Handbooks for genebanks no. 1. The design of seed storage facility for genetic conservation. Rome: IBPGR.Google Scholar
  3. Engelmann, F., & Rao, R. (2013). Major research challenges and directions for future research. In N. M. Noor, H. F. Chin, & B. M. Reed (Eds.), Conservation of tropical plant species (pp. 511–526). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Engelmann, F., & Engels, J. M. M. (2002). Technologies and strategies for ex situ conservation. In J. H. H. Engels, V. R. Rao, A. H. D. Brown, & M. T. Jackson (Eds.), Managing plant genetic diversity (pp. 89–104). Wallingford/Rome: CABI/IPGRI. Huaman 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Frankel, O. H. (1970). Genetic conservation in perspective. In O. H. Frankel, & E. Bennett (Eds.), Genetic resources in plants – Their exploration and conservation (IBP handbook no. 11, pp. 469–489). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Frankel, O. H., & Brown, A. H. D. (1984). Plant genetic resources today – A critical appraisal. In J. H. W. Holden & J. T. Williams (Eds.), Crop genetic resources – Conservation and evaluation (pp. 249–259). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. FAO/IPGRI. (1994). Genebank standards. Rome: FAO/IPGRI.Google Scholar
  8. FAO. (2006). International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. UN/FAO Rome. http://www.fao.orh/AG/cgrfa/itpgr.htm. Accessed 6 Apr 2006.
  9. Guarino, L., Ramanatha Rao, V., & Reid, R. (Eds.). (1995). Collecting plant genetic diversity – Technical guidelines. Cambridge: CAB International University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Guarino, L., Ramanatha Rao, V., & Goldberg, E. (Eds). (2011). Collecting plant genetic diversity: Technical guidelines – 2011 update. Rome: Bioversity International. ISBN 978-92-9043-922-6. Available online: http://cropgenebank.sgrp.cgiar.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=390& Itemid=557
  11. Hawkes, J. G. (1987). World strategies for collecting, preserving and using genetic resources. In A. J. Abbott & R. K. Atkin (Eds.), Improving vegetatively popagated crops (pp. 285–301). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkes, J. G. (1982). Genetic conservation of recalcitrant species – An overview. In L. A. Withers, & J. T. Williams (Eds.), Crop genetic resources – The conservation of difficult materials (IUBS series B42, pp. 83–92). Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Huamán, Z., Ortiz, R., & Gómez, R. (2000). Selecting a Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena core collection using morphological, geographical, disease and pest descriptors. American Journal of Potato Research, 77, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hummer, K. E. (1989). Rubus germplasm in the National Clonal Germplasm repository. Acta Horticulturae, 262, 25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ipek, M., Seker, M., Ipek, A., & Gul, M. (2015). Identification of molecular markers associated with fruit traits in olive and assessment of olive core collection with AFLP markers and fruit traits. Genetics and Molecular Research, 14(1), 2762–2774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller, E. R. J., & Senula, A. (1999). Morphological studies in garlic to support the discussion of a reformulation of the ECP/GR minimum descriptor list. In: L. Maggioni, D. Astley, H. Rabinowitch, J. Keller, & E. Lipman (Eds.), Report of a working group on Allium, 6. Meeting 23–25.10. 1997, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. IPGRI, Rome.Google Scholar
  17. Maxted, N., Hawkes, J., Guarino, L., et al. (1997). Towards the selection of taxa for plant genetic conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 44, 337.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008643206054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ng, S. Y. C., & Ng, N. Q. (2000). Cryopreservation of cassava and yam shoot tips by fast freezing. In F. Engelmann & H. Takagi (Eds.), Cryopreservation of tropical plant germplasm (pp. 418–420). Rome: JIRCAS/IPGRI.Google Scholar
  19. Reed, B. M., Engelmann, F., Dulloo, M. E., & Engels, J. M. M. (2004). Technical guidelines for the management of field and in vitro germplasm collections. Roma: IPGRI.Google Scholar
  20. Roberts, E. H., King, M. W., & Ellis, R. H. (1984). Recalcitrant seeds: their recognition and storage. In J. H. W. Holden & J. T. Williams (Eds.), Crop genetic resources: Conservation and evaluation (pp. 38–52). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Stover, E. Aradhya M, Dangl, J., Prins, B., & Cousins, P. (2009). Grape genetic resources and research at the Davis California National Clonal Germplasm Repository. In: E. Peterlunger (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th international conference on grapevine genetics and breeding. Acta Horticulturae, 827, ISHS, pp. 192–196.Google Scholar
  22. SGRP-CGIAR. Crop Genebank Knowledge Base. Aavailable at: http://cropgenebank.sgrp.cgiar.org/
  23. Tao, K.-L. (2001). Chapter 4 Seed Conservation. In M. S. Saad & V. R. Rao (Eds.), Establishment and management of field genebank, a training manual. Serdang: IPGRI-APO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Rajasekharan
    • 1
  • V. Ramanatha Rao
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Plant Genetic ResourcesICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Global Research for Development Support Ventures (GRSV)BengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations