Advertisement

Effect of Pretreatment Methods to Cotton Fabrics on Printing Conductive Patterns

  • Meijia Yan
  • Zhiqing XinEmail author
  • Shouzheng Jiao
  • Feilong Li
  • Luhai Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 543)

Abstract

E-textiles have been paid wide attention due of popularization of wearable devices, and its core is the preparation of conductive lines on the fabric surface. In this paper, conductive lines are quickly formed on the surface of cotton fabrics by means of screen-printed conductive inks. The effects of pretreatment methods such as alkali soaking of cotton fabrics, plasma and transparent slurry on the penetration of ink on fabric surface are studied. And the conductivity, water resistance of the patterns printed on the cotton fabric substrate are tested. The results show that the conductive pattern printed after the plasma treatment has the best conductivity, sheet resistance is 120.8 mΩ/square; the conductive pattern printed after the transparent slurry treatment is 134.8 mΩ/square; the conductivity after alkali soaking treatment is the worst, and its sheet resistance is 253.8 mΩ/square, which is even lower than the conductivity of the untreated conductive pattern. This study provides a new direction for the flexible integration of electronic components and textiles in electronic smart textiles.

Keywords

Cotton fabrics Pretreatment Smart textiles Fabric properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been financed by BIGC through Project: (04190118002/064), Course Construction Project (22150118005/003) and College Student Research Training Project (22150118022/077).

References

  1. 1.
    Cherenack, K., Zysset, C., Kinkeldei, T., et al. (2010). Woven electronic fibers with sensing and display functions for smart textiles. Advanced Materials, 22(45), 5178–5182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yanping, W., & Weiguo, D. (2012). Application and development trend of electronic smart textiles. Shandong Textile Science & Technology, 53(3), 38–41.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rossi, D. D., Carpi, F., Lorussi, F., et al. (2003). Electroactive fabrics and wearable biomonitoring devices. Autex Research Journal, 3(4), 180.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Periolatto, M., Ferrero, F., Montarsolo, A., et al. (2013). Hydro repellent finishing of cotton fabrics by chemically modified TEOS based nanosol. Cellulose, 20(1), 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahou, W., Ghemati, D., Oudia, A., et al. (2010). Preparation and biological characterization of cellulose graft copolymers. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 48(2), 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang, K., Torah, R., Wei, Y., et al. (2013). Waterproof and durable screen printed silver conductive tracks on textiles. Textile Research Journal, 83(19), 2023–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meijia Yan
    • 1
  • Zhiqing Xin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shouzheng Jiao
    • 1
  • Feilong Li
    • 1
  • Luhai Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication (BIGC)BeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations