Corpus and Computational Methods for Usage-Based Chinese Language Learning: Toward a Professional Multilingualism

  • Zhuo Jing-SchmidtEmail author
Part of the Chinese Language Learning Sciences book series (CLLS)


Language is a complex functional adaptive system (Beckner et al. in Lang Learn 59:1–26, 2009; Ellis in Usage-based perspectives on second language learning, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, pp 49–73, 2015). Language learning is learning to use a complex system Larsen-Freeman (Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, Routledge, London, pp 47–72, 2011). It is a multidimensional task involving social cognitive processes that interact both in time and space MacWhinney (Usage based perspectives on second language learning, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 19–48, 2015). Language learning in the twenty-first century is “enmeshed in globalization, technologization, and mobility” and hence “emergent, dynamic, unpredictable, open ended, and intersubjectively negotiated” (The Douglas Fir Group in Mod Lang J 100:19–47, 2016: 19). Accordingly, the field of language teaching is more interdisciplinary than ever. It requires not only knowledge of language as a functional system and knowledge of language learning as a human socio-cognitive endeavor but also expanded communication across domains traditionally separated by differences in the methodology of knowledge construction. This chapter focuses on the usage-based model of language and language learning within a broader cognitive theory of linguistic knowledge and its development. The goal is to establish a theoretical relevancy and methodological necessity of corpus and computational methods to the knowledge base for language pedagogy as a practical field. In doing so, this chapter serves to ground the application of such methods as part of a professional multilingualism that informs the learning, teaching, and assessment of Chinese as a second language.


  1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and memory (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barcroft, J. (2013). Input-based incremental vocabulary instruction for the L2 classroom: Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism. New York: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
  7. Barsalou, L. W., Huttenlocher, J., & Lamberts, K. (1998). Basing categorization on individuals and events. Cognitive Psychology, 36(3), 203–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system. Position paper. Language Learning, 59(S1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  9. Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2), 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Behrens, H., & Pfänder, S. (2016). Experience counts: Frequency effects in language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belzung, C., & Wigmore, P. (2013). Neurogenesis and neural plasticity. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blom, E., Paradis, J., & Duncan, T. (2012). Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular –s in child L2 English. Language Learning, 62(3), 965–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation. The case of very advanced L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. (1981). The social context of language acquisition. Language & Communication, 1(2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bybee, J. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. J. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  19. Byrnes, H. (1998). Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
  20. Byrnes, H. (2000). Shaping the discourse of a practice: The role of linguistics and psychology in language teaching and learning. The Modern Language Journal, 84(4), 472–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Byrnes, H. (2012). Advanced language proficiency. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 506–521). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), Serial no. 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carpenter, M., Pennington, B., & Rogers, S. (2002). Interrelations among social-cognitive skills in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(2), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Chomsky, N. (2002). On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cook, G., Kasper, G., Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 554–740.Google Scholar
  27. Crookes, G. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy. A socioeducational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dąbrowska, E. (2008). The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 931–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory; a contribution to experimental psychology. New York City: Teachers College, Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48(4), 631–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ellis, N. C. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 232–249.Google Scholar
  33. Ellis, N. C. (2011). Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 35–47.Google Scholar
  34. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.Google Scholar
  35. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellis, N. C. (2013). Second language acquisition. In G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 365–378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ellis, N. C. (2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–73). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  38. Ellis, N. C. (2017). Cognition, corpora, and computing: Triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67(S1), 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ellis, R. (Ed.). (2001). Form-focused instruction and second language learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Ellis, R. (2009). Correct feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3–18.Google Scholar
  42. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira, F., Jr. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 75–93). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Ellis, N. C., Romer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016a). Constructions and usage-based approaches to language acquisition. Language Learning, 66(S1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ellis, N. C., Romer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016b). Computational models of language usage, acquisition, and transmission. Language Learning, 66(S1), 241–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Eskildsen, S. W. (2008). Constructing another language—Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). L2 Negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62(2), 335–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fillmore, C. J. (1992). “Corpus linguistics” or “Computer-aided armchair linguistics”. In I. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics (pp. 35–60). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  49. Fotos, S. (2002). Structure-based interactive task for the EFL grammar learner. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 135–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Goldberg, A. E., & Casenhiser, D. (2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 197–215). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gries, S. T. (2006). Introduction. In S. T. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 1–17). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  56. Gries, S. (2009). What is corpus linguistics? Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gries, S. (2015). Statistical methods in learner corpus research. In G. Gilquin, S. Granger, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 159–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gries, S., & Ellis, N. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(S1), 228–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gries, S., Hampe, B., & Schönefeld, D. (2005). Converging evidence: bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(4), 635–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Han, Z.-H. (2004). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Han, Z.-H. (2016). Research meets practice: Holding off and holding on. Chinese as a Second Language, 51(3), 236–251.Google Scholar
  62. Han, Z.-H., & Odlin, T. (2006). Introduction. In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 1–20). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  63. Hofman, M. (2002). Plasticity in the adult brain: From genes to neurotherapy. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Summer School of Brain Research. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  64. Hoshino, A., & Yasuda, A. (2013). Automatic discrimination of pronunciations of Chinese retroflex and dental affricates. In M. Sun, M. Zhang, D. Lin, & H. Wang (Eds.), Chinese computational linguistics and natural language processing based on naturally annotated big data (pp. 303–314). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hsiao, H.-S., Chang, C.-S., Lin, C.-Y., Chen, B., Wu, C.-H., & Lin, C.-Y. (2016). The development and evaluation of listening and speaking diagnosis and remedial teaching system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 372–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Huang, C.-R., & Lenders, W. (2005). Computational linguistics and beyond: An introduction. In C.-R. Huang & W. Lenders (Eds.), Computational linguistics and beyond (pp. 1–16). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  67. Ibbotson, P. (2013). The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 255.Google Scholar
  68. Jiao, L., Kubler, C. C., & Zhang, W. (2011). 500 common Chinese idioms: An annotated frequency dictionary. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Jing-Schmidt, Z. (2011). Zero anaphora in higher level Chinese writings across learner backgrounds. Chinese Teaching in the World, 25(2), 258–267.Google Scholar
  70. Jing-Schmidt, Z. (2015). The place of linguistics in CSL teaching and teacher education: Toward a usage-based constructionist theoretical orientation. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 50(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  71. Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Peng, X. (2018). Linguistics theories and teaching Chinese as a second language. In C. Ke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese second language acquisition (pp. 63–81). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jing-Schmidt, Z., Peng, X., & Chen, J.-Y. (2015). From corpus analysis to grammar instruction: Toward a usage-based constructionist approach to constructional stratification. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 50(2), 109–138.Google Scholar
  73. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. (2008). Natural language processing, speech recognition, and computational linguistics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  74. Kapatsinski, V. (2014). What is a grammar like? A usage-based constructionist perspective. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 11(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
  75. Ke, C. (2012). Research in second language acquisition of Chinese: Where we are, where we are going. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 47(3), 43–113.Google Scholar
  76. Ke, C. (2018). Chinese SLA: Introduction and future directions. In C. Ke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese second language acquisition (pp. 1–8). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ke, C., Lu, Y., & Pan, X. (2015). 汉语教师教学技能及二语习得理论知识的评估模式. (Assessing international Chinese language teachers’ second language acquisition theoretical foundation and language pedagogy). 《世界汉语教学》 (Chinese Teaching in the World), 29(1), 111–129.Google Scholar
  78. Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 47–72). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Li, X. (2014). Variation in subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 269–300.Google Scholar
  83. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1999). The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  85. Macwhinney, B. (2005a). The emergence of linguistic form in time. Connection Science, 17(3–4), 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. MacWhinney, B. (2005b). Extending the competition model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. MacWhinney, B. (2006). Emergent fossilization. In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 134–156). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  88. MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the Unified Model. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. MacWhinney, B. (2015). Multidimensional SLA. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 19–48). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  90. Madlener, K. (2016). Input optimization: effects of type and token frequency manipulation in instructed second language learning. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: Frequency effects in language (pp. 133–174). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  91. Markee, N. (1997). Second language acquisition research: A resource for changing teachers’ professional cultures? The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies in classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(4), 241–253.Google Scholar
  94. Nosofsky, R. (1988). On exemplar-based exemplar representations: Reply to Ennis (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 412–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nugent, M., & Slater, R. (2016). The language flagship: Creating expectations and opportunities for professional-level language learning in undergraduate education. In D. Murphy & K. Evans-Romaine (Eds.), The U.S. language flagship program: Professional competence in a second language by graduation (pp. 1–9). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Peterson, M. (2006). Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Peterson, M. (2010). Computerized games and simulations in computer-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis of research. Simulation and Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 41(1), 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. M., & Rowland, C. F. (1998). Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category. Linguistics, 36, 807–830.Google Scholar
  99. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  100. Piske, T., & Young-Scholten, M. (2008). Input matters in SLA. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  102. Reali, F. (2014). Frequency affects object relative clause processing: Some evidence in favor of usage-based accounts. Language Learning, 64(3), 685–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rossano, F., Fiedler, L., Tomasello, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2015). Preschoolers’ understanding of the role of communication and cooperation in establishing property rights. Developmental Psychology, 51(2), 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sale, A. (2016). Environmental experience and plasticity of the developing brain. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley/Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a proposed universal. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 73–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Schachter, J. (1990). On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 6(2), 93–124.Google Scholar
  110. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schulze, C., & Tomasello, M. (2015). 18-month-olds comprehend indirect communicative acts. Cognition, 136, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 209–231.Google Scholar
  114. Selinker, L., & Lamendella, J. (1978). Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3(2), 143–191.Google Scholar
  115. Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). From input to intake: On argumentation in second language acquisition. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 394–403). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  116. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information on the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7(2), 118–132.Google Scholar
  117. Shih, M.-H., & Hsieh, S.-K. (2016). Word dependency sketch for Chinese language learning. Concentric, 42(1), 45–72.Google Scholar
  118. Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Smith, E. R. (1991). Illusory correlation in a simulated exemplar-based memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sockett, G., & Kusyk, M. (2015). Online informal learning of English: Frequency effects in the uptake of chunks of language from participation in web-based activities. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 153–177). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  122. Stubbs, M. (2001). Texts, corpora, and problems of interpretation: A response to Widdowson. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Tao, H. (Ed.). (2016). Integrating Chinese linguistic research and language teaching and learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  124. The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2), 61–82.Google Scholar
  128. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  129. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57(6), 1454–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Tragant, E., & Muñoz, C. (2004). Second Language acquisition and language teaching. International Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 197–219.Google Scholar
  132. Tummers, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2005). Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(2), 225–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Verspoor, M., & Nguyen, T. P. H. (2015). A Dynamic usage-based approach to second language teaching. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 305–328). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  135. Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 451–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wulff, S. (2010). Rethinking idiomaticity: A usage-based approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  138. Xiao, R., Rayson, P., & McEnery, T. (2009). A frequency dictionary of Mandarin Chinese: Core vocabulary for learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  139. Xu, Q. (2016). Item-based foreign language learning of give ditransitive constructions: Evidence from corpus research. System, 63, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2013). Variability in Chinese as a foreign language learners’ development of the Chinese numeral classifier system. Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Zhang, J., & Tao, H. (2018). Corpus Linguistics and Chinese SLA. In C. Ke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese second language acquisition (pp. 48–63). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations