Experiment 1

  • Yu-Leng Lin
Part of the Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics book series (FiCL, volume 8)


In this chapter, I address two major questions. First is whether a pattern that is predicted by this implicational universal is easier to learn than one that is not. The second question concerns how to determine which grammar is learned better.


  1. Albright, Adam, and Young Ah Do. 2013. Biased learning of phonological alternations. The 21th Manchester Phonology Meeting, May 23–25, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Albright, Adam, and Young Ah Do. 2015. The source of the paradigm uniformity preference. Annual Meeting on Phonology (AMP), Oct 9–11, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Bao, Zhiming. 2000. Sub-syllabic processes and the Southern Min syllable. In Chinese phonology in generative grammar, ed. Xu Debao, 95–116. NewYork: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, Douglas, and Martin Maechler. 2009. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-32.
  5. Berent, Iris. 2013. The phonological mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2008. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer /Computer program/.
  7. Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2012. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer /Computer program/.
  8. Chen, Matthew Y. 2000. Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, Robert. 1968. Tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics 41: 19–42.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, Robert. 1973. Some notes on tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics 100: 5–25.Google Scholar
  11. Chou, Tai-yun. 2002. An optimality-theoretic analysis on Southern Min nasality. Master’s thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, Raung-fu. 1996. The segmental phonology of Southern Min in Taiwan. Taipei: Crane.Google Scholar
  13. Conway, Christopher M., Althea Bauernschmidt, Sean S. Huang, and David B. Pisoni. 2010. Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition 114 (3): 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ettlinger, Marc, Ann R. Bradlow, and Patrick C.M. Wong. 2014. Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology. Applied Psycholinguistics 35 (4): 807–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ettlinger, Marc, Kara Morgan-Short, Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg, and Patrick C. M. Wong. 2015. The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science. 1–26.Google Scholar
  16. Finley, Sara. 2011a. The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony. Journal of Memory and Language 65: 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finley, Sara. 2011b. Generalizing to novel consonants in artificial grammar learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 33 (33): 3268–3273.Google Scholar
  18. Fiser, József, and Richard N. Aslin. 2002. Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 15822–15826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez, Rebecca L., and LouAnn Gerken. 1999. Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70: 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsieh, Feng-Fan. 2006. High infidelity. In Working Papers in Linguistics 52: Studies in Loanword Phonology, ed. Feng-fan Hsieh and Michael Kenstowicz, 1–27. Cambridge: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Hsieh, Feng-Fan. 2003. Loanword tonology in Taiwanese. Paper presented at the 15th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  22. Hsu, Hsiu-Ling. 2009. A study of English coda nasals: Taiwanese learning English as a foreign language. Academy Colloquium Language Acquisition and Optimality 7.Google Scholar
  23. Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2009. The architecture of grammar in artificial grammar learning: Formal biases in the acquisition of morphophonology and the nature of the learning task. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  24. Kimper, Wendell. 2015. Asymmetrical generalisation of harmony triggers. In Annual Meeting on Phonology (AMP), Oct 9–11, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  25. Lien, Chin-Fa. 2000. Denasalization, vocalic nasalization and related issues in Southern Min: A dialectal and comparative perspective. In Essays of linguistic change and the Chinese dialects, ed. Pang-Hsin Ting and Anne O. Yue. Taipei: Academic Sinica.Google Scholar
  26. Lin, Yu-Leng. 2010. Testing Universal Grammar in phonological artificial grammar learning. Master’s thesis. National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  27. Lin, Yu-Leng. 2012. Nasal harmony with opaque segments: Evidence from wug tests. Generals paper, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  28. Lin, Yu-Leng Lin. 2016. Sonority effects and learning bias in nasal harmony. Doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  29. Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25 (1): 83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgan-Short, Kara, Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg, Katherine Brill-Schuetz, Helen Carpenter, and Patrick C.M. Wong. 2014. Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (1): 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pan, Ho-Hsien. 2007. The effects of prosodic boundaries on nasality in Taiwan Min. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (6): 3755–3769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinheiro, José, and Douglas Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reber, Arthur S. 1967. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin, and Elissa L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274: 1926–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saffran, Jenny R., Elizabeth K. Johnson, Richard N. Aslin, and Elissa L. Newport. 1999. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition 70: 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schneider, Walter, Amy Eschman, and Anthony Zuccolotto. 2002. E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Ting, Pang-Hsin. 1985. Taiwan Yuyan Yuanliou (sources of languages in Taiwan). Student: Taipei.Google Scholar
  38. Tu, Jung-Yueh. 2013. Word prosody in loanword phonology: Focus on Japanese borrowings into Taiwanese Southern Min. Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University.Google Scholar
  39. Tu, Jung-Yueh, and Stuart Davis. 2009. Japanese loanwords into Taiwanese Southern Min. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on East Asian Linguistics. Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  40. Ullman, Michael T. 2004. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92 (1–2): 231–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ullman, Michael T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice, ed. Christina Sanz, 141–178. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Visser, Ingmar, Maartje E.J. Raijmakers, and Emmanuel M. Pothos. 2009. Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning. American Journal of Psychology 122 (3): 293–307.Google Scholar
  43. Walker, Rachel. 2000. Nasalization, neutral segments and opacity effects. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  44. Walker, Rachel. 2011. Nasal harmony. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice, 1838–1865. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Wang, Samuel. 1993. Nasality as an autosegment in Taiwanese. Paper presented at the first international conference on languages in Taiwan, March, National Normal University, Taipei (also in Wang 1995, 66–85).Google Scholar
  46. Wang, Samuel. 2001. A concept formation experiment on the nasality of vowels in Taiwan Min. Language and Linguistics 2 (1): 183–195.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, Colin. 2003. Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. WCCFL 22: 533–546.Google Scholar
  48. Yang, Charles. 2004. Universal grammar, statistics, or both. Trends in cognitive sciences 8: 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang, Zheng-Xiang. 1989. Notes on Southern Min dialects of Taiwan (Language of publication: Chinese). Taipei: The Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zimmerer, Vitor C., Patricia E. Cowell, and Rosemary A. Varley. 2011. Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar. Memory Cognition 39: 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and LiteraturesFeng Chia UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations